20/01/05 

Angry Harry has been banned in yet another government department.

Dear AH

You may be interested to learn that the ****, one of
the largest Government Departments in the country, has now Blocked access to your website www.angryharry.com for all users of it's PC Network, even though they have Internet access to the rest of the world.

Your website is deemed to have unacceptable content. However, access to www.ihatemen.com is unimpeded as are all the other anti men websites.

Keep up the good work!

F

Dear F

This is an outrage.

It was only a few days ago that MPs were loudly proclaiming that freedom of speech was far too important an issue for the BBC to be prevented from showing Jerry Springer The Opera - or whatever it was.

And here we have a government department blocking its workers from having access to this most fabulous of sites!

The idea, of course, is that the 'censors' in your organisation like to see themselves as part of the governing elite - or more likely - they are simply mini-Hitlers aspiring to higher salaries and greater fiefdoms by getting more brownie points from those above them.

Fair enough.

We all chase our own ambitions.

But these particular people fully intend to whip people like you into shape!

You are not permitted to have a mind of your own.

Your mind must be governed!

By them!

How dare you even look at a site like Angry Harry!

Goodness me. This is an outrage. Who on Earth do these people think that they are!?

The organism of government - particularly those in the higher echelons - are trying to create an 'us' and 'them' situation. It wants evermore power - and this means taking it away from people.

And western governments are doing this on every front where they operate - with the tax burden being enormous as a result.

They want more and more power over your children and over the educational system. They want the power to stop you from smoking - or from whatever. They want the power to intervene in your relationships. etc etc etc etc.

On and on it goes.

And, most importantly, they want to dominate the way that you think.

Fundamentally - in essence! - this is what the censorship of Angry Harry by various government departments is all about.

They want to take some power away from Angry Harry, and they also want to take some power away from you!

Thank goodness that all this new technology has arrived!

Because they haven't got a hope!

By blocking sites like this, they are simply dragging those who work for government closer to some unholy abyss from which they might find it increasingly hard to escape.

After all, the more that governments aggravate, irritate and separate their people - the bloodier will be the ensuing battles between them. And what governments need to do is to open the doors to information as quickly as possible or we are all going to end up in a most terrible mess. 

The organism of government is trying to increase its power by taking it away from the people. The more does it succeed in this, the greater will become the divide between the people and the government. The greater is this divide, the greater will be the hostility between the two parties.

The consequence will be that the organism of government will then try to create an even bigger divide in order to protect itself from the growing hostility of the people. This will cause even more hostility. And so the whole process will escalate.

In the end, however, my guess is that the people will have their way, because they are becoming more and more empowered thanks to the new technology.

But, ...

1. How bloody are the wars between peoples and their governments going to be, and for how long?

2. Will there be an unholy disaster on the way? - e.g. bio-terrorism.

3. What if the governments 'win' - given that in the very near future they will only be able to win by really stamping very hard upon their peoples? 

Indeed, for a government to win, it would have to place successfully its people under a very heavy-duty dictatorship. Nothing else could restrain the people given the new technologies - especially those that might give rise to bio-terrorism, or something similarly heinous.

As such, governments simply cannot be allowed to win.

If they do, then we are either doomed to servitude and communist-type living wherein there exists a very privileged and heavily-protected governing elite; and millions of very heavily-oppressed serfs! - i.e. an extremely strong police state ...

No. Thank. You.

... and/or we will forever face destruction and mayhem emanating from one source or another.

But, as I said some time ago, I am optimistic that enough clever people will be able to spread the word far enough to ensure that this does not actually happen. And, thanks to the new technology, they have considerable power to do this.

And if you think that I am exaggerating, then think about something like this.

Imagine that the year is 2010.

And imagine that a very angry man - just ONE angry man - discovered (or cleverly argued) that Tony Blair had profited - or was now profiting - financially from the Iraq war. And that he was living in the lap of luxury.

And imagine that he whips up many others to his point of view.

January 2010.

This bast**d lied and lied over Iraq's WMD.

He killed thousands of people simply in order to feather his own nest.

He is currently doing extremely well financially and receives hundreds of thousands of pounds annually from a couple of organisations that benfitted from the Iraqi war.

He killed your children and your loved ones simply to boost his own career within the highest echelon of the governing elite and to guarantee his future earnings.

And then imagine how many thousands of people - especially Iraqis with dead relatives - might feel about the notion that Tony Blair had actually profited handsomely - and, perhaps, actually sought to profit financially in the first place - through his wheelings and dealings over Iraq.

Can you imagine just how many people would want him or his loved ones dead or damaged in some way as some kind of retribution?

And, by 2010, they would actually have the means to carry out such things with relative ease.

And, for example, it would not be very difficult to find Tony Blair's children.

And some sort of retribution like this can go right down the ladder to just about any government official who upsets people.

It might just be a brick through the window in the home of a lowly family court worker - but it might even be death.

Who knows?

And remember, I was taking about just ONE MAN stirring things up.

Just.

One!

How do you stop this man? And how would you stop others like him - without a very heavy-duty police state in force?

Do you see?

We have a very serious problem on our hands.

And there are going to be wars between peoples and those who try to govern them. And the sooner that the people win, the better will it be for just about everyone. As such, blocking Angry Harry to those who work for government is a particularly bad idea.

After all, what better defence could a government possibly have than to alert as many of its own workers as possible to what horrors are likely to be coming their way if they are not careful and proceed appropriately to counteract either potential problems for themselves or for others and to adjust to negative situations before they materialise?

As such, governments should be allowing their workers to know what is going on out here - or they will have absolutely no hope of dealing satisfactorily with the future.

The spread of information is the key - not the blocking of it!

Sacre Bleu!

A few months ago Fathers4Justice threw powder all over MPs in the House Of Commons.

But what if, instead, some Fathers4Justice members had simply given a few angry Al- Qaeda sympathisers the wherewithal to carry out a similar deed? This would have extremely easy to do - because of the internet.

Nightmare!

And so If you want to give me the name of the dipstick who is responsible for blocking my site I shall most happily put it up in lights and expose him or her for the arrogant mind-numbing stupidity of what he or she has done. Indeed, what could be more humiliating than being shown up publicly to be the unbelievably stupid government official who actually blocked the home troops from seeing where the threats might be coming from?

You should be marching up to them and saying, "How dare you deprive us of  information that might be of help to us in dealing with the uncertain future that we all face. How dare you jeopardise the well-being of the staff. The likes of Angry Harry and Fathers4Justice are doing this country - and, hence, us - a service. They should be being applauded and publicised, not vilified and hidden from our view!"

And this is not an exaggeration.

For example, MPs are now actually much safer as a result of the actions of Fathers4Justice.

And yet how do they treat Fathers4Justice?

With contempt! 

For example, ...

+ Parenting Plans Not Acceptable UK fathers’ rights groups today attacked the Government’s new “parenting plans” and said the legislation did not go far enough.

Lord Falconer earlier denied that the reforms had been driven by the Fathers4Justice group’s civil disobedience campaign.

Can you believe it?

You've got all these fathers campaigning for some kind of justice in the family courts, with some of them prepared to go to extraordinary lengths to press their point of view, and yet these corrupt arrogant self-serving self-aggrandised sh#ts in power claim that they are completely unaffected by it all - with many stating quite openly that they intend to ignore groups like Fathers4Justice.

And this is a 'democracy'? - where politicians are supposed to listen to those who have grievances?

Who the hell do these people think they are? And what is it going to take to shake them out of their stupidity, eh? Bullets in the heads of a few of them? Some particularly heinous form of powder in their faces?

When are these greedy toads going to wake up to the fact that they cannot contain the people any longer and keep all the power to themselves? - and that the more that they try to block those folk who have grievances against them the more aggressive are those folk going to become?

And when it comes to the men's movement, these people are going to end up being squashed like pesky bugs in the near future if they are not careful; because nobody wants to live in the kind of state that these self-serving crooks are trying to take us toward; especially those who work for government.

If you look at what happens when governments become too strong, it is those who are closest to government who are regimented and monitored most of all They are the ones who have to keep watching their steps the most.

...

June 2006

I took this from the Policeman's Blog ... 

As I sit here, I cannot think of a single thing that I do that is not monitored. If I attend a pub for some reason, I have to enter it into a computer system; if I drive along a certain street, I fill out a form showing my attendance at a particular crime hotspot and if I ask a person to account for his presence at a particular place…I fill out another form and make an entry on another computer system.

...

Fortunately, power is rapidly shifting away from those political worms who swank around in expensive places hobnobbing with the elite and it is shifting towards the people - particularly towards men, and particularly towards men-who-sit-at-screens.

And blocking sites like Angry Harry to those who work for government has to be one of the most stupid things that they can do. This will simply make the future battles bloodier. And it will deny those who work for government an understanding of the problems that they are going to face and from where they are going to arise.

In the same way that doctors must put the interests of their patients first, and schoolteachers must put the interests of their children first, so it is that those working in government departments must put the interests of their people first. And if they don't, they are increasingly going to find themselves facing problems - personal problems - because as the new technologies are mastered by more and more ordinary people it is not going to be at all difficult to make them pay a personal price for failing in their duties.

Somehow, some way, they will be scuppered - and it is only those who put the interests of the people before those of their political masters who will end up doing well.

And I promise you that I am not exaggerating.

For example, within the coming decade or so, Tony Blair will either be dead or in some prison cell - courtesy of some Arabs, would be my guess. There are just so many ways opening up wherein this can be brought about that I just cannot see how this can be avoided. And, quite frankly, he will deserve whatever he gets because he is a self-serving deceiver and a liar who has taken a leading part in the killing of thousands of people.

This man has not even apologised for his 'mistakes'.

On the contrary, he has actually had the nerve to promote others who took part in the whole deception. And the very sight of him must aggravate millions of Muslims. 

If this man had even an ounce of integrity he would have apologised and resigned. Instead, he remains in office, completely unconcerned that his country and his people are far more likely to be attacked as a result of his continuing presence as prime minister.

This man and his party have done so much damage to this country that they have got to go.

And man-hating politicians like the deceitful Harriet Harman are also going to face the increasing wrath of thousands of very angry man; courtesy of the growing men's movement. 

As such, the futures of these people are going to become increasingly unhappy. 

And they will be unable to hide. 

And the same kind of thing goes for all those liars at the Home Office who are currently betraying their people and their country with their downright dishonesty and their phony 'research'.

Basically, the people are going to punish those who have harmed them. And those with particularly deep long-standing grievances (angry Arabs, the falsely accused, those denied access to their children, etc etc) are going to find it increasingly easy to get their hands on those who have hurt them.

Incidents like 9/11 and the purple powder fiasco at the House of Commons are going to become much easier to orchestrate as the new technologies develop and become more available - e.g. bioterrorism.

And less dramatic events like bricks through the windows of the homes of family court judges or other officials are also going to increase. And the only real hope that we have is to OPEN the doors to information.

Of course, those lofty folk who currently have power won't like this - particularly if they have something to hide - and they will try to prevent this from happening - which is why they are blocking sites like Angry Harry - but we must not let them get away with this because they will do us monumental harm.

The senior family court judges are waking up to this and they are now requesting that there is far less secrecy in the family courts. And those of you who work in government departments need to do the same in your areas of operation. And you need to spill the beans, to tell the truth, and to undermine those who are simply serving themselves or their bankrupt ideologies e.g. those relating to political correctness and feminism; because they are going to lose. 

Besides which, your job is to serve your people and your country, not your political masters. And you must do everything that you can to bring this about.

My advice is to take note of all those people in your department who are responsible for denying your friends and colleagues access to important information that will help them and/or who are pursuing an agenda that is detrimental to the country and to the people - particularly to its men.

All of us who would like to live in happier circumstances rather than in deteriorating ones must do our best to expose what is going on. And this includes those of you who work for government.

Finally, it is surely more important that those who work for government have decent access to sites like this than it is for any other working group to have access to it.

After all, forewarned is forearmed!

Best wishes