reading

Feminism Causes Traffic
Congestion and Global Warming

(click)

reading

 

world

 

 

Recent comments from some emails which can be viewed in full here. ...

"I cannot thank you enough."

"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."

"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."

"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "

"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."

"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."

"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."

"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."

"It is terrific to happen upon your website."

"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."

"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)

"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)

"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."

"You are worth your weight in gold."

"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."

"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"

"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."

"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."

"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."


Before reading Angry Harry ...

clinton

After reading Angry Harry ...

clinton

 

 

Arina Patrikova

Brain Of Britain

Arina Patrikova - first email following her visit to Harry's News ...

Dear "Harry" 

Is it the lack of breast milk in infancy that has made you incapable of putting good jokes on your website? Is it the lack of pussy in adulthood that makes you so bitter that you are barely articulate? Finally, what is it that makes you incapable of selecting truly informative articles on women (some of those articles would indulge your beer-bellied misogyny as well as any), instead of "defunct links" and worthless personal testimonies?

I look forward to hearing these questions answered.

Best,

Arina.

...

My reply ...

Thank you.

I have replied on my site.

...

The reply on Angry Harry is as follows ...

I've got hate mail!

The first in 6 months!

...

arina.patrikova@magdalen.oxford.ac.uk

Is it the lack of breast milk in infancy that has made you incapable of putting good jokes on your website? Is it the lack of pussy in adulthood that makes you so bitter that you are barely articulate? Finally, what is it that makes you incapable of selecting truly informative articles on women (some of those articles would indulge your beer-bellied misogyny as well as any), instead of "defunct links" and worthless personal testimonies?

I look forward to hearing these questions answered.

Best, 

Arina Patrikova

...

Hello Arina

Oxford University eh?

What do you do there? - clean the toilets?

If so, then, take it from me, you are definitely not over-qualified for the job.

Best 

Harry

...

LOL!

It's amazing, isn't it?

So many women nowadays seem completely incapable of saying anything interesting. They just hope to intimidate people by hurling insults and sneering at them.

You can often see it developing early on; such as in the playground where spiteful little girls spend their entire break time trying to stir up hatred towards other little girls whom they do not favour currently - usually for some truly pathetic reason; such as "their hairstyle is wrong".

Arina Patrikova - second email. 

Because she is viewing Harry's News rather than Angry Harry, she has not seen my reply on Angry Harry ...

I cannot see any update for now-- will wait and try again.

My comments were not meant to offend you personally (evidently, as I do not even know you), no more than the sexism and unsubstantiated claims in the Men's Issues and Humour sections of the site are aimed at a particular woman. Please consider my e-mail an attack on the character that comes across in the "ideas" and their presentation. This is why, incidentally, the name "Harry" was put in inverted commas.

Best, 

Arina.

...

My reply ...

I know insults when I see them.

My site is ...

http://www.angryharry.com/

Arina Patrikova - third email ... 

Thanks for the link, bud.

Your response is really telling, by the way. Men expect to indulge their sexism free of charge, and yet call women juvenile. Not that you are wrong-- I am a brat.

By the by, who are the semi-castrated illiterati by the name of xxxx and xxxxx xxxxx  that are sending me poorly spelled messages? If you happen to know, tell them to send in some more.

Best, 

Arina.

...

My reply ...

I have no idea who they are. [In fact, they are MRAs who are responding to her insulting email.]

But, quite frankly, I wouldn't gloat too much over their poor grammar and spelling.

After all, it is women who will tend to pay most of the price in the future for their lack of education.

Arina Patrikova - fourth email ... 

I suppose they are appreciative readers who find solace in the recognition of their plight.

I wonder if it is women who "pay the price." Given that, in Europe, Australia and North America at least, as well as in some parts of Asia and South America, women are attending higher education establishments as much (sometimes more) than men, it may not be fair to make such a statement. Everywhere, the uneducated/illiterate pay an equal price; one might even argue (and this is totally in line with your point of view re male oppression) that women have it easier, as penises come more cheaply than vaginas (crudely speaking) and a woman is at least assured sustenance by her ability to find a husband. Not that any of it is good or desirable. The facts seem to favour women, as they did back when education did not even exist.

Dare I suggest a book? "The Adapted Mind," ed. Barkow, Cosmides & Tooby may give you more material (perhaps better informed) for your thoughts on the subjects. If you've read it already, I hope you found it interesting. It would be good to see an informed "evolutionary" take-- this is an ostensibly powerful weapon against feminism. One can, of course, respond to that too.

Finally, I reserve the right to mock spelling and grammar, simply because I operate in my third language and feel naturally superior, in one small respect, to anyone who cannot master his first. I hope this is not too offensive.

Best, 

Arina.

...

My reply ...

Well, I'm glad to see that you are not quite as stupid as I thought.

But I think that you are going to see a positively huge backlash against 'women' at some time in the near future.

I don't think that you can see what is going on out there quite as well as I can - for the simple reason that i have been watching for quite a few years now.

And you think that I'm bad? Well. You should see the ***thousands*** of "men's activists" that remain hidden behind closeted forums.

I'm a gentle pussy cat in comparison to many of them.

Arina Patrikova - fifth email ... 

I don't think you're "bad." In fact, my first and persistent impression was that I was dealing with someone underinformed and vulneable, possibly traumatised.

You attempt to put it across that a large-scale staged rebellion, Fight Club-style is coming up. Unfortunately, underground forums and "man power" groups will remain just that. People come there for support. Did your mommy drink? Awww. Did your pussy run away? Awww. Never had sex at 35 because you look like road-killed road kill? Awww. Etc. Men come with their insecurities that they attempt to transform into real issues.

One thing I'll give you: child custody is a hugely important matter, and I myself think it unfair (insultingly so) that such a bias exists towards the female parent. However, your site lumps this important issue with high social costs with the worst kind of stupid, panicky misogyny. Think about this. Read stuff. Show that you have indeed been watching for a few years, not just dreaming and pillow-talking.

Best,

Arina.

...

My reply ...

Nothing but insults and assertions.

You have said nothing of value.

You are proof of what men complain about.

Truly pathetic.

Arina Patrikova - sixth email ... 

Dear Harry,

Why are you so upset? And if you can do so much better than I, why on earth don't you?

Best,

Arina.

...

My reply ...

OK.

Look at my site in a couple of days time.

Arina Patrikova - seventh email ... 

Deal

Arina Patrikova - eighth email ... 

Dear "Harry,"

I have looked at your web page. I shall in due course provide references to the passages that offended me in the Men's Issues section of Harrysnews.

In the meantime, if you could possibly include my e-mail exchanges with your buddies, I would rather appreciate it.

Furthermore, do feel free to go ahead with the web site. Given the expected content, it will be free promo for my own.  You do not seem to have understood anything-- from the tone of the e-mail, to the responses, to the fact that I stated explicitly which sections are sub-par, it has all escaped you. Therefore, please, do make my name show up in search engines-- I won't have the time to do it myself.

Thanks in advance!

Best,

Arina.

...

My reply ...

Dear Ms Patrikova

You fell into a trap of your own making.

You came across Harry's News and it seems that you decided that because it was oriented towards men you would endeavour to undermine the confidence of the site owner by mocking him; presumably using your Oxford University email address to add some weight to your attempt.

You thought that you would try to humiliate and, hence, hurt a man whom you had never met called "Harry" who, by your own admission, you thought was "vulnerable" and "possibly traumatised".

You failed.

You came across me instead.

You have made a fool of yourself, in my view.

You have also shown yourself to be a somewhat deeply unpleasant character, in my view.

And I shall simply use your emails to good effect to further my cause.

They will help me to awaken other men to it. 

And they will also disgust many women.

As such, you have ended up serving a very good purpose.

**My** purpose.

So it seems to me that you have achieved the very **opposite** of what you intended. 

And this surely suggests that you are really not as clever or as wise as you think.

Indeed, in my view, any intellectual abilities that you might possess seem to be heavily outweighed at the moment by an over-inflated sense of self-importance which, quite frankly, does not seem to me to be even remotely justified.

And your emails thus far give me the impression of an immature spiteful little girl who is currently too inebriated with some kind of delusion of her own superiority to recognise what a fool she is making of herself.

In other words, a spoiled stubborn self-opinionated little Madam aged about 10 comes to mind.

Anyway. I have no interest in talking to you further, and so I will not be responding to any more of your emails.

Furthermore, I would advise you that you are definitely out of your depth round here, and that you are also not in an area of cyberspace that is likely to be very friendly towards you.

So, please go away. 

It is in your own interests to do so.

Finally, if you want your name to be removed from this website then please follow the instructions that I gave you earlier.

 

under

Click for ...

popular

other

oxford

 

old

facts

spot

 

  bottom

bottom three

Share



thumbsup

world

popular othermp