Recent comments from some emails which can be
viewed in full here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I
read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are
indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have
changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for
hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly
wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I
regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your
website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making
your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!"
(from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours
of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular
basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone
mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98%
of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while
now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing
the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."
Before reading Angry Harry ...
After reading Angry Harry ...
Arina Patrikova
Brain Of Britain
Arina Patrikova - first email following her visit to Harry's News ...
Dear "Harry"
Is it the lack of breast milk in infancy that has made
you incapable of putting good jokes on your website? Is it the lack of pussy in
adulthood that makes you so bitter that you are barely articulate? Finally, what
is it that makes you incapable of selecting truly informative articles on women
(some of those articles would indulge your beer-bellied misogyny as well as
any), instead of "defunct links" and worthless personal testimonies?
I look forward to hearing these questions answered.
Is it the lack of breast milk in infancy that has made you
incapable of putting good jokes on your website? Is it the lack of pussy in
adulthood that makes you so bitter that you are barely articulate? Finally, what
is it that makes you incapable of selecting truly informative articles on women
(some of those articles would indulge your beer-bellied misogyny as well as
any), instead of "defunct links" and worthless personal testimonies?
I look forward to hearing these questions answered.
Best,
Arina Patrikova
...
Hello Arina
Oxford University eh?
What do you do there? - clean the toilets?
If so, then, take it from me, you are
definitely not over-qualified for the job.
Best
Harry
...
LOL!
It's amazing, isn't it?
So many women nowadays seem completely
incapable of saying anything interesting. They just hope to intimidate people by
hurling insults and sneering at them.
You can often see it developing early on; such
as in the playground where spiteful little girls spend their entire break time
trying to stir up hatred towards other little girls whom they do not favour
currently - usually for some truly pathetic reason; such as "their
hairstyle is wrong".
Arina Patrikova - second email.
Because she is viewing
Harry's News rather than Angry Harry, she has not seen my reply on Angry Harry
...
I cannot see any update for now-- will wait and try
again.
My comments were not meant to offend you personally
(evidently, as I do not even know you), no more than the sexism and
unsubstantiated claims in the Men's Issues and Humour sections of the site are
aimed at a particular woman. Please consider my e-mail an attack on the
character that comes across in the "ideas" and their presentation.
This is why, incidentally, the name "Harry" was put in inverted
commas.
Your response is really telling, by the way. Men expect
to indulge their sexism free of charge, and yet call women juvenile. Not that
you are wrong-- I am a brat.
By the by, who are the semi-castrated illiterati by the
name of xxxx and xxxxx xxxxx that are sending me poorly spelled messages?
If you happen to know, tell them to send in some more.
Best,
Arina.
...
My reply ...
I have no idea who they are. [In fact, they are MRAs
who are responding to her insulting email.]
But, quite frankly, I wouldn't gloat too much over their poor grammar
and spelling.
After all, it is women who will tend to pay most of the price in the
future for their lack of education.
Arina Patrikova - fourth email ...
I suppose they are appreciative readers who find solace
in the recognition of their plight.
I wonder if it is women who "pay the price."
Given that, in Europe, Australia and North America at least, as well as in some
parts of Asia and South America, women are attending higher education
establishments as much (sometimes more) than men, it may not be fair to make
such a statement. Everywhere, the uneducated/illiterate pay an equal price; one
might even argue (and this is totally in line with your point of view re male
oppression) that women have it easier, as penises come more cheaply than vaginas
(crudely speaking) and a woman is at least assured sustenance by her ability to
find a husband. Not that any of it is good or desirable. The facts seem to
favour women, as they did back when education did not even exist.
Dare I suggest a book? "The Adapted Mind,"
ed. Barkow, Cosmides & Tooby may give you more material (perhaps better
informed) for your thoughts on the subjects. If you've read it already, I hope
you found it interesting. It would be good to see an informed
"evolutionary" take-- this is an ostensibly powerful weapon against
feminism. One can, of course, respond to that too.
Finally, I reserve the right to mock spelling and
grammar, simply because I operate in my third language and feel naturally
superior, in one small respect, to anyone who cannot master his first. I hope
this is not too offensive.
Best,
Arina.
...
My reply ...
Well, I'm glad to see that you are not quite as stupid
as I thought.
But I think that you are going to see a positively huge
backlash against 'women' at some time in the near future.
I don't think that you can see what is going on out
there quite as well as I can - for the simple reason that i have been watching
for quite a few years now.
And you think that I'm bad? Well. You should see the
***thousands*** of "men's activists" that remain hidden behind
closeted forums.
I'm a gentle pussy cat in comparison to many of them.
Arina Patrikova - fifth email ...
I don't think you're "bad." In fact, my first
and persistent impression was that I was dealing with someone underinformed and
vulneable, possibly traumatised.
You attempt to put it across that a large-scale staged rebellion, Fight
Club-style is coming up. Unfortunately, underground forums and "man
power" groups will remain just that. People come there for support. Did
your mommy drink? Awww. Did your pussy run away? Awww. Never had sex at 35
because you look like road-killed road kill? Awww. Etc. Men come with their
insecurities that they attempt to transform into real issues.
One thing I'll give you: child custody is a hugely important matter, and I
myself think it unfair (insultingly so) that such a bias exists towards the
female parent. However, your site lumps this important issue with high social
costs with the worst kind of stupid, panicky misogyny. Think about this. Read
stuff. Show that you have indeed been watching for a few years, not just
dreaming and pillow-talking.
Best,
Arina.
...
My reply ...
Nothing but insults and assertions.
You have said nothing of value.
You are proof of what men complain about.
Truly pathetic.
Arina Patrikova - sixth email ...
Dear Harry,
Why are you so upset? And if you can do so much better than I, why on earth
don't you?
Best,
Arina.
...
My reply ...
OK.
Look at my site in a couple of days time.
Arina Patrikova - seventh email ...
Deal
Arina Patrikova - eighth email ...
Dear "Harry,"
I have looked at your web page. I shall in due course provide references to the
passages that offended me in the Men's Issues section of Harrysnews.
In the meantime, if you could possibly include my e-mail exchanges with your
buddies, I would rather appreciate it.
Furthermore, do feel free to go ahead with the web site. Given the expected
content, it will be free promo for my own. You do not seem to have
understood anything-- from the tone of the e-mail, to the responses, to the fact
that I stated explicitly which sections are sub-par, it has all escaped you.
Therefore, please, do make my name show up in search engines-- I won't have the
time to do it myself.
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Arina.
...
My reply ...
Dear Ms Patrikova
You fell into a trap of your own making.
You came across Harry's News and it seems that you decided that
because it was oriented towards men you would endeavour to undermine the
confidence of the site owner by mocking him; presumably using your Oxford
University email address to add some weight to your attempt.
You thought that you would try to humiliate and, hence, hurt a man whom you had
never met called "Harry" who, by your own admission, you thought was
"vulnerable" and "possibly traumatised".
You failed.
You came across me instead.
You have made a fool of yourself, in my view.
You have also shown yourself to be a somewhat deeply unpleasant
character, in my view.
And I shall simply use your emails to good effect to further my cause.
They will help me to awaken other men to it.
And they will also disgust many women.
As such, you have ended up serving a very good purpose.
**My** purpose.
So it seems to me that you have achieved the very **opposite**
of what you intended.
And this surely suggests that you
are really
not as clever or as wise as you think.
Indeed, in my view, any intellectual abilities that you might
possess seem to be heavily outweighed at the moment by an over-inflated sense of
self-importance which, quite frankly, does not seem to me to be even remotely
justified.
And your emails thus far give me the impression of an immature
spiteful little girl who is currently too inebriated with some kind of delusion
of her own superiority to recognise what a fool she is making of herself.
In other words, a spoiled stubborn self-opinionated little Madam
aged about 10 comes to mind.
Anyway. I have no interest in talking to you further, and so I will not be responding to any more of your emails.
Furthermore, I would advise you that you are definitely out of your
depth round here, and that you are also not in an area of cyberspace that is likely to be
very
friendly towards you.
So, please go away.
It is in your own interests to do so.
Finally, if you want your name to be removed from this website
then please follow the instructions that I gave you earlier.