Angry Harry
Blog
Guide To Feminist Nonsense
Recent comments from some emails which can be viewed in full here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."
|
20/7/00 Intelligence - Nature vs Nurture Environment is more important than genes when it comes to intelligence, politically-corrected scientists keep telling us. If this is true, however, then it would follow that the Homo Sapiens of 20,000 years ago was not as intelligent as we are today. However, these very same 'scientists' keep telling us that we are no more intelligent than the very first human beings! But they simply cannot be right on both counts - unless they also argued that 20,000 years of 'environmental progress' and change achieved absolutely nothing in the way of developing our intellect. But if they argued this, they would then scupper their own notion that the environment was important! After all, the environment that surrounds, let's say, city-dwellers, right now, is VASTLY different from the environments and conditions of 20,000 years ago. If such enormous changes haven't altered intelligence levels, then what environmental changes will? Also, if environment is extremely important when it comes to intelligence, then it follows that those brought up in more primitive environments are less intelligent than those brought up in more 'enriched' environments. And this must mean that simple, primitive, isolated 'tribalfolk' are less intelligent than 'civilised' folk who live in places that are 'enriched', and where experts provide a mountain of education to those who study and learn from them.. But politically-corrected 'scientists' would also deny this! And by doing so, they again scupper their own notion that the environment is important. If the environment is of greater significance than heredity when it comes to intelligence - as politically-corrected 'scientists' would have you believe - then it also follows that poorer folk should be less intelligent than richer folk, that those doing dull boring jobs should be less intelligent than those doing stimulating ones, and that women throughout the ages (who were, apparently, oppressed into domestic servitude for most of their lives) were less intelligent than their men - throughout the whole of History! And, surely, such a notion is unthinkable. ... ... Hmm. ... ... Hmm. ... Hmm. ... Well, maybe not! ... |
|
|
|
The so-called oppression of women ...
Click a picture |
