|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Your Emails
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is.
And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's
health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to
women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being
designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in
social service care-homes as
boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their
children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide,
20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the
mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far
less in benefits from the government.
In other words, when compared to women, men are
significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their
children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit
system, and even when it comes to their
own personal
safety.
They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work
place.
How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools
And Feminists
Women -
Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture
Some BBC Propaganda Tricks
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
A Permanent Gender War?
Rape Baloney
| |
|
20/7/00
Intelligence - Nature
vs Nurture
Environment is more important than genes
when it comes to intelligence, politically-corrected scientists keep telling us.
If this is true, however, then it would
follow that the Homo Sapiens of 20,000 years ago was not as intelligent as
we are today.
However, these very same 'scientists' keep
telling us that we are no more intelligent than the very first human beings!
But they simply cannot be right on both
counts - unless they also argued that 20,000 years of 'environmental progress' and change
achieved absolutely nothing in the way of developing our intellect.
But if they argued this, they would then scupper their
own notion that the environment was important!
After all, the environment that
surrounds, let's say, city-dwellers, right now, is VASTLY different from the
environments and conditions of 20,000 years ago. If such enormous changes
haven't altered intelligence levels, then what environmental changes will?
Also, if environment is extremely
important when it comes to intelligence, then it follows that those brought up
in more primitive environments are less intelligent than those brought up in
more 'enriched' environments.
And this must mean that simple,
primitive, isolated 'tribalfolk' are less intelligent than 'civilised' folk who
live in places that are 'enriched', and where experts provide a mountain of
education to those who study and learn from them..
But politically-corrected 'scientists' would
also deny this!
And by doing so, they again scupper their own notion that
the environment is important.
If the environment is of greater significance
than heredity when it
comes to intelligence - as politically-corrected 'scientists' would have you
believe - then it also follows that poorer folk should be less intelligent than
richer folk, that those doing dull boring jobs should be less intelligent than
those doing stimulating ones, and that women throughout the ages (who were,
apparently, oppressed into domestic servitude for most of their lives) were less
intelligent than their men - throughout the whole of History!
And, of course, politically-corrected 'scientists' would
also deny all of these things.
In short, politically-corrected scientists
simply cannot have it both ways - unless they fudge, duck, dive, twist, deceive,
distort and lie.
Which they do.
No wonder the public has such little
respect for politically-corrected scientists these days.
Their politically-corrected nonsense and their
willingness to deceive are
just too obvious even for the lay person.
Also see ...
Men are More Intelligent than Women
|
| |
When women were 'oppressed' ...




click a picture
Are you an
intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then
please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable
and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of
the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your
intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism
for yourself.
|