Killing abusive men is OK
are the facts: On May 13, 2002, Dontee D. Stokes three times shot a priest who
had molested him eight years previously. On Monday, a Baltimore jury of 11 women
and one man acquitted Stokes of attempted murder and assault. Maggie
Presumably if it's OK to kill a priest who
sexually abused you eight years ago and ...
daughter of a romantic novelist yesterday walked free from court after she was
cleared of murdering her sister's abusive boyfriend.
... and it's OK to kill someone who has abused
your sister, then it must surely be OK to kill the woman who is trying to take
away - or has succeeded in taking away - your home and your children!
Well, of course, I never advocate violence.
But it must be obvious to readers how
perverse, corrupted and utterly hateful toward men has the western justice
Should a man be domestically violent toward
someone's sister, he can be killed. Should he sexually abuse someone he can also
be killed. (Though in both cases, of course, he cannot actually attend the court
to defend himself or to protest his innocence of any crime - because he is
But when a man has his home and his children
taken away from him - something that both genders would admit is far
worse than either sexual abuse or domestic violence - woe betide him should he
respond violently in any way at all!
He would be pulverised by the judicial system.
He would not be exonerated by it.
The justice system was partly borne out of a
need to protect individuals from draconian actions by the state. As far as men
are nowadays concerned its function is continually being perverted in order to
allow women and the state to trample upon them, to deprive them of the things
that they hold most dear, to imprison them, and even to kill them with relative
And, increasingly, men are having to prove
their innocence in relationship crimes.
The western justice system has become an enemy of western men
The western justice system has become an enemy
of western men thanks to the corrupt self-serving politicians who have
purposefully made laws to discriminate against them.
Make no mistake. Our politicians are fully
aware of the devastating effects that their policies are having on our society.
They are well aware of how badly children - especially boys - are being affected
by what they are doing, not only with regard to the consequences of family
breakdown but also with respect to denying them a proper education and a decent
For example, the evidence of the huge negative
effects of fatherlessness on children and society is now overwhelming and
But politicians clearly couldn't give a damn
for the welfare of their people, as is evidenced by the fact that they continue
to support laws which demonstrably perpetuate and worsen the
Politicians who are quite prepared to inflict
disadvantage and discrimination upon a large section of their own people knowing
full well what they are doing deserve to be tried as criminals in the future.
Indeed, if it is considered to be legally and
morally acceptable to kill men who have abused us, then this must mean that we can
kill those judges and politicians who have abused us.
Furthermore, if it is OK for a woman to kill a
man who has been abusive toward her, then it must be OK for a man to rape a
woman for the very same reason. (Think about it.)
And if you think otherwise, then you have been
well and truly brainwashed into valuing the entire life of a man
as being worth less than even the mildest of traumas to a woman's vagina.