16/12/02

Cherie Blair

Poor Cherie. 

UK Cherie Blair broke down in tears tonight as she denied there was anything improper in her contact with the convicted fraudster Peter Foster over the purchase of two flats.

Ah. Poor little baby. She was found to be lying, and she has now started to cry.

Good.

What a face!

What a put on! 

Let's hope that she is hurting badly.

"I now realise I made two mistakes. My immediate instinct when faced with the questions from the Mail on Sunday 10 days ago was to protect my family's privacy and particularly my son in his first term at university living away from home."

Ah. How sad!

She wants to protect her son and her family.

How sweet.

But she is perfectly happy to advocate policies that actually mess up thousands of OTHER families and she doesn't seem to give a sh*t about THEIR sons.

Oh look. Here's her husband, Tony Blair, ... 

Men can't have a minister, says Blair

A call for the Government to appoint a minister for men's issues has been rejected by the Prime Minister.

Mr Blair has already appointed a Minister for Women, Trade Secretary Patricia Hewitt, and allocated a question time slot for women's issues.

Tory MP David Amess asked him to establish the post of minister for men's issues.

But in a Commons written reply, Mr Blair told him: "I have no plans to do so."

Story filed: 22:05 Monday 28th October 2002

Doesn't your heart want to bleed for her?

Well, I have a message for Mr and Mrs Blair. In the same way that they are messing up the lives of thousands of other less-privileged families and thousands of other less-privileged sons, so let them know that they shall reap what they sow.

Well Done to the Daily Mail for pursuing her and catching her out in her lies and her trickery.

When it comes to feeble protests about the need to protect their family, the Blairs - almost of all people in the country - do not have a leg to stand on. And I hope that the mainstream media continue to persecute the Blair family with as much vitriol as they can. And if their sons are affected - tough.

Let them feel the pain. 

It will hardly be comparable to what so many others have to go through.

The lies and the hypocrisy of the Blairs and their government when it comes to protecting families make me sick. And given that Tony Blair is completely unconcerned about the plight of so many men and boys, why should anyone care about his son?

Cherie Blair's privacy should be invaded. Why should she have privacy protection when virtually no other family in this country has it?

For example, this is a woman who supports the NSPCC's eternal quest to spy on families through interrogating their children while at school.

This is a woman who vocally supports the domestic violence industry at any given opportunity - an industry that does hell of a lot more than merely invade the privacy of families. It breaks them up and keeps them apart.

This is the woman who actually handed out a bravery award to a woman because she killed her husband while he slept!

This is a woman who wants medical staff to ask all women on a regular basis if they experience 'domestic violence'.

Boo Hoo cries Tony Blair a few hours ago, as he protests that certain sections of the media have locked on to certain facts about the matter and distorted the truth about it.

Talk about hypocrisy!

This man is in charge of a government that receives top prize when it comes to outright lies and deceit. The public has every right to investigate a woman in her position when she is found to be dealing with a known fraudster in her attempts to purchase two apartments in a swanky area at knock down prices.

The public also has every right to know about her superstitions and her belief in pseudoscience, witchcraft and mumbo jumbo.

And, as for protecting the privacy of her family - What. A. Joke. Her support for the feminist movement is an admission that she doesn't even believe in the family. She supports an ideology that claims that marriage oppresses women. She supports an ideology that promotes more family breakdown than any other ideology in history.

What a nerve she has to bleat on about protecting her family!

She cries because she wants to protect the privacy of her son who is shortly off to university.

How sad.

This is a woman whose support for feminism and political correctness has harmed millions of sons and millions of men.

This is the woman whose educational values have disadvantaged every son in the country. 

But so long as her son is all right, then this is all that matters to her.

No-one else's son counts.

Her son does not have to cope with an education that has failed him.

Her son will have many privileged options with which to make his future rosy. 

Not so, however, for those uneducated boys whose only hope of gaining a decent living is through illegal drug dealing or criminality. 

Not for Cherie Blair's son a fatherless home. 

Not for him a broken family. 

Not for him a crummy job and a neighbourhood ruled by delinquents.

Nope. Sorry. Cry away Cherie. I have no sympathy for you.

You know. About ten years ago, I got very uptight (nothing new there!) when the Sun's editor was fighting his corner in a TV studio discussion and arguing that politicians were simply too powerful to be granted much in the way of privacy. I was appalled. No privacy? How dare he not allow other people their own privacy - even if they are politicians or powerful people.

The audience agreed with me. 

Everyone was entitled to their privacy, they said.

The Sun's editor lost the vote.

I was pleased.

Well. Not any more!

I have learned a lot since then. 

Powerful people are not entitled to their privacy - especially when they are happy to invade the privacy of other people, their homes and their families.

No Sirree Cherie.

No privacy for me.

No privacy for thee!

+ UK Around the country, people supporting Mrs Blair were in the minority. Sixty-two per cent of those taking part in an online poll conducted by a Manchester newspaper said they had found her unconvincing.

+ UK What is it that women want? One minute, Cherie and her kind demand to be treated as professional equals, then they turn round and play the little woman. Women cannot have it both ways. Sarah Sands

+ UK The central issue here is not the legality of what Mrs Blair did, nor whether it conforms to New Labour policy. It is the appearance of gross conflict of interest. A conman has rendered services to the Prime Minister's wife of the sort that would customarily be paid for. She performed at least two favours on his behalf. Mary Dejevsky

+ UK Cherie Blair was last night fighting against a fresh wave of allegations about her links with Peter Foster, the convicted fraudster, after it emerged that papers on his legal fight against extradition were faxed to her private study in Downing Street.