Angry Harry
Blog
 Page3
Your Emails

 

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

A Permanent Gender War?

Rape Baloney

                               

30/06/03

Respected Academics

A 'respected academic' - Dr G. ... DPhil. (Oxon), LL.B. - writes to me and to others claiming that feminism and Nazism are not 'similar'.

In my view they are indeed similar, for a number of reasons; e.g. see my piece entitled Feminism and Nazism.

But this lofty academic is being rude and condescending towards me. And he suggests that the way forward for the men's movement is to take heed of "respected academics".

And so I fire off a very hostile email in reply.

Another activist steps in ...

...

Ouch...Harry

Dr. G is a great Guy...he authored the FIRST and ONLY report in Canada on MALE GENDER DISCRIMiNATION by the COPS, Crown, Courts....etc. as compared to Women. which is now accepted by peers..and will be a GREAT help to ALL men in Canada and no doubt help other MENS Groups in other Countries get same going...

This report will be out soon....he was kind enough to send me a copy for my use in a Human Rights Investigation.....

You two guys both have my highest respect...and I see two different Styles...that's cool...my paltry little preference would be 4 you both to get along well, as in my books, the both of you are and have contributed one hell of a lot to the cause in fighting misandry.....

H

...

Hi H

The man was being arrogant and rude to me. And his email to me was full of bullsh*t.

Furthermore, he talks about the need to listen to "respected academics". Which ones eh?

No. Don't tell me. I know!

The ones with a 'feminist perspective'.

Yep, the Jews could have avoided all their problems if only they had listened to and consulted with "respected academics".

This is what he is suggesting.

And so men's activists should do the same.

What a load of rubbish.

And where have the "respected academics" been for the past three decades?

For example, do we count as "respected academics" all those alleged experts who never noticed the positively huge negative effects of fatherlessness staring them in the face for two whole decades?

Yeah sure. The men's movement will go a long way by being respectfully academic.

And what about the hugely "respected" and oft-quoted academics like Steve Jones - who reckon that all men are parasites?

Perhaps the men's movement should listen to "respected academics" like him!

Yes indeed. We should advise all men to go out and shoot themselves to save the Earth from their own diabolically parasitic presence.

Perhaps we should listen to the "respected academics" at the Home Office, who think that 'rape' by a stranger is equivalent to 'rape' within a relationship, and who also assume that women never lie.

Perhaps we should listen to the "respected academics" in our educational system - who disadvantage all the boys.

We don't live in a world governed by ***respectable*** academics. We live in a world governed by politics, pressure groups, money and self-promotion.

That's the reality!

This guy is living in Cloud-Cuckoo Land.

Yep. There are definitely people who are reasoned and careful enough in their thinking to consider only the facts rather than the histrionics.

The trouble is this. 

Very few such people exist, and they are **not** the ones who exert much in the way of power. If they did, feminism (and Nazism) would never have gotten such a stranglehold in the first place.

He might know a great deal about the law, but he certainly doesn't know much about human psychology, nor, indeed, about activism.

But he presumes to!

And he does so by being rude and sarcastic in an attempt to undermine our efforts.

His is a voice that says that the more strident men's activists are 'missing the plot' and undermining their own cause by being aggressive towards their opponents.

This is bullsh*t.

It is mostly because of these activists that we are making any progress at all. And anyone trying to undermine my own efforts in the eyes of men's activists is going to be undermined by me!

Unsurprisingly.

If he had something decent to say which showed me to be wrong, I would be extremely eager to hear it, and to absorb it.

I hate to be wrong.

But to receive an arrogant email comprised SOLELY of shallow, nit-picking, uneducated, sarcastic, dismissive, unsubstantiated comments - ALL OF WHICH are invalid - and which was obviously designed **purely** to belittle our efforts and to flatter his own ego - e.g. a "respected academic" - winds me up.

Further, as you know, there has been fantastically good work by "respected academics" in connection with many men's issues (e.g. Gelles on the DV industry, Warren Farrell, Christina Hoff Sommers etc) going back two decades.

Where did this get us?

Nowhere. 

The vast majority of people just ignored their work completely, and feminism marched onwards absolutely unscathed.

G may have produced a great report about discrimination against men. But many other "respected academics" have already done such things in different areas of concern to men. And such reports are simply disappeared quickly into obscurity unless people like us keep making a fuss on the basis of them.

I'm afraid that this is the way that the real world operates nowadays.

Furthermore, "Men are parasites" according to scientists like Steve Jones and Bryan Sykes. 

"Jews are parasites".

And this man can't see the similarities between feminism and Nazism?

He must also be autistic!

LOL!

And he tells me that, "The systemic physical brutality is what *makes* the Nazis the exemplar of their kind. Without it, *they* wouldn't have been "Nazis," either."

Oh really! So, until the "Nazis" became 'brutal', they didn't exist!

The "Nazi" party that Hitler began to lead in 1921 and that started to demonise and discriminate most heavily against Jews didn't exist!

How strange!

Everyone must have just imagined that it existed!

It was all a delusion inside their heads.

What nonsense.

Finally, I'm sure that he is a great guy, but I don't take kindly to anyone, great or not, who tries to make me out to be a fool unless they have some reasonable justification for doing so and/or some evidence to back up their claims.

He had neither of these things.

AH

......

Added note:

About two weeks ago, I was conversing with a highfaluting lawyer in the UK - he might even have been a judge. He was also making the point that to capture the ear of the judiciary one needed cold evidence and hard facts etc (as if such a thing is actually possible given the way in which social science research - most of which is politically motivated - is conducted; e.g. perverse definitions of domestic violence etc). He said something like, "Unless you and your men's movement present convincing evidence to us which is clear and unambiguous, and which argues your case in measured terms etc etc, then you will not get much support from us."

My answer, I think, genuinely astounded him. "What makes you think that the men's movement needs the support of the judiciary? The way I see it, it won't be very long before the judiciary needs the support of the men's movement. Indeed, it is you lot who are soon going to have to provide "convincing evidence" in "measured terms" for what you are doing, not us."

However, despite all my vitriol, I must say that there are now many judges speaking out with regard to men's concerns. The walls of silence and political correctness are now cracking apart very audibly. And we must also remember that these people have been silenced and intimidated in the past much like the rest of us.

It is also worth bearing in mind that one of the main functions of the judiciary is to protect citizens from abusive actions by the state. And some American judges are finally beginning to take this aspect of their duties a little more seriously than they have done in the recent past. Indeed, a federal judge, Judge John S. Martin, has actually just resigned over this very matter. 

And here in the UK there is currently quite a battle going on between the politicians and the judges over which of them is ultimately responsible for dishing out 'justice'.

And the judges, just like everyone else, seem likely to lose out in the face of the ever-growing onslaught of the state.

And whom should we support, the judges or the state?

Well, to put it bluntly, I don't know.

Finally, here is some scientific evidence from some "respected academics" in support of my claims concerning successful activism in the real world.

Why do insults once hurled at us stick inside our skull, sometimes for decades? ... Nastiness just makes a bigger impact on our brains. And that is due to the brain's "negativity bias": Your brain is simply built with a greater sensitivity to unpleasant news. The bias is so automatic that it can be detected at the earliest stage of the brain's information processing.

Indeed, there is a mountain of research on the best ways in which to campaign effectively and it shows, quite clearly, that 'negative' campaigning is the tops.

And as men who have been on the receiving end of such horrible campaigning for so very long, don't we know it!?

Also, please keep remembering that the feminists, the racial activists and the gays gained their enormous power not through politeness and nor through any subservience to "respected academics."

They intimidated, they bullied, and they yelled. And they did lots of other horrible things too.

The men's movement is a fluffy pussy cat in comparison.

Thus far!

 

When women were 'oppressed' ...








click a picture

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.