Slimy Toads Touting For Votes
Some examples ...
More Young Voters Needed Young people should be able to vote - and stand for Parliament - at 16, under proposals for the biggest shake-up of the electoral system since the introduction of universal
The argument, of course, is that politicians need to interest more people in the
political process. The truth, however, is that this is a sneaky way of
feathering their own nests.
Young people tend to vote for policies which, on the surface, sound sweet and
which promise cheap rewards, but they are too young to understand the costs.
Nowhere is this more evident than in their naive view that those who oppose big
European government do so because they are 'racist'.
Giving younger people the vote is the equivalent of letting children run their
own schools or their own families.
There is an old adage that rings true: Younger people tend to vote with their
hearts - i.e. on the basis of their emotions - whereas older people tend to vote
with their minds - i.e. on the basis of their past experience and their
As such, younger people tend to vote leftwards whereas older people tend to
But because younger people tend to vote for bigger government, politicians
are very keen to get them on the voting register.
In my view, however, until western governments are brought to heel, people should be
encouraged not to vote at all. The less that people vote, the less legitimacy
and, hence, the less power, do governments have - something which, right now,
men's activists should be aiming for; e.g. see Self-Serving Politicians.
governments, of all persuasions, will always seek to take away from men.
It does not matter which party you vote for, governments, of all persuasions,
will always seek to take away from men.
For example, last week Gordon Brown, and now, David Cameron, ...
Millions For Women David Cameron will step up his efforts to win over female voters today by delivering an unequivocal commitment to back equal pay for women in the
In my view, David Cameron is as two-faced and as shallow as Tony Blair.
Set up 18 months ago Lady Prosser's Commission will reveal that more women than men work in the lowest paid jobs, the so-called "five Cs" - catering, cleaning, cashiering, clerical work and caring.
And who, exactly, is forcing women into doing these jobs, eh?
'wealthier' women are taken out of the 'gender pay'
Well, one of the reasons for this alleged pay disparity is that the partners
of women from the poorer parts of society tend to be unable to afford to
maintain a household on their income - so their women go out to work. For richer people, the wives can stay at
home. As such, the 'wealthier' women are taken out of the 'gender pay' equation.
After all, they are not at work!
This skews the statistics for women's pay in such a way as to give the
impression that women - as a whole - are being hard done by.
Another reason for the alleged pay gap is that poorer women are entitled to various benefits and, as
such, they are not as desperate for jobs as are men; which means that they will
have a tendency to choose easier jobs. And, of course, the benefits do not count
Another reason that women choose easier jobs - particularly when they are
younger - is because - as many young women are prone to do - they do not see
their futures as depending on their jobs. They dream about collaring a man who
will earn enough to keep them in a manner which they desire. And so, once again,
they tend to choose easier jobs.
Now, I have not actually seen the research on which this current nonsense is
based, but I am willing to bet that none of the above factors were taken into
According to a survey of 5,000-plus teenage girls, their main ambition is to complete university then return to the homestead - whether their partners like it or not.
... and, of course, if women choose to study wooly, economically worthless
subjects at college - such as Women's Poetry During The Heinous Patriarchy -
then it is hardly surprising that they fail to qualify for more lucrative jobs.
Goodness me: Even when it comes to figuring out maps, women give up in half
the time that men do ...
UK men who have got their directions askew wait an average of 20 minutes before giving up and asking for directions
whereas women only wait for 10 minutes.
... and this, of course, is yet another demonstration of why men rather
than women are the leaders in their fields and why they get the top jobs.
(Also see Are Women Not Even Responsible For Their Work Choices?
and Men Should Earn More than Women)
Thousands Of Teenagers Forced Into Prostitution Tonight our cameras take you into a dark world you've never seen," intoned John Quinones darkly on last week's edition of ABC Primetime. "American girls being snatched right off Main Street USA. And they could be your very own daughters." Shocking!
- but not true - Debbie Nathan
Yes indeed. The demonisation of men, the
stirring up of hatred towards men and, hence, between men, is a great way to
accumulate money and power.
Whether it's the phony David Cameron trying to
sweet-talk women into voting for him by articulating falsehoods about men
discriminating against women in the workplace, or Gordon Brown's wife drumming
the domestic violence beat, or blatant government lies about sex-trafficking, there is one thing that they all have in common - the stirring up
of hostility and aggression towards men - FOR PROFIT!
of people who do the above are precious little more than selfish parasites
- parasites on men. They take away from men (in the form of taxes, liberty,
dignity etc) and they use their resources to inflict further harm on men.
these deceitful self-serving malicious groups - organisms - are still
growing in number and size.
Brunswick's Moosehead Breweries has pulled an ad that implied women should speak
no more than 50 words a day.
... Yes indeed. Merely making light-hearted
jokes about women talking too much, and off the air you go. But making very
serious false and damaging allegations about men, and no-one gives
Why's that Angry Harry?
Well; Junior. If you are a woman then you
are a very lofty and superior being that no-one must even make jokes about. You
are the Muslim equivalent of Allah.
Cartoons not allowed!
But if you're a
man, then you are just a piece of worthless sh*t.
Women > Man
Gordon Brown's Wife Seeks To Profit From Abuse Sarah Brown, the wife of the Chancellor, thrust herself into the public eye last night by fronting a new campaign to help battered
Claiming to be a strong advocate for 'battered wives' is a common
ploy that many shallow people in the public eye use to try to give the
impression that they are oh-so-caring.
these people are just fraudsters touting for
The truth, of course, is that these people are just fraudsters touting for
public approval without having to put any serious effort into gaining it.
And, of course, lofty folk who go around claiming that they are great supporters
of a "woman's issue" will get invited to give all sorts
of lectures and speeches hither and thither by various women's groups, which will bring
them handsome fees
and further publicity. And they will also get invited to many parties wherein
people who have made good money out of the abuse industry congregate and share
Gordon Brown and his wife probably thought, "Hmm. What role can the
wife of a high-ranking state official take up in order to increase the amount
of support that they both end up receiving from the public? Aha! Wife beating!
That's a good one! And, of course, you don't have to know anything about the
subject. Just wail about women being victims and pretend to care and it is
guaranteed that thousands of women will lap up your words and the media
feminists will give you plenty of attention - indeed, as per the above article."
Politicians and their spouses are forever falling over themselves to give the
impression that they are the champions of women.
And they do so at a cost to all men.
And now, changing the subject only very slightly, I want to remind you of
Just after the July London bombings Tony Blair
flew back from the G8 meeting in Scotland to London in order, he claimed, to offer his sympathy to the victims, and
to make his various speeches
of defiance against the terrorists. The majority of people were bamboozled into
seeing this as
some kind of evidence that Tony Blair was 'in touch with his people'.
of course, was that this was an international media opportunity that only a fool
of the highest order would have passed up. Most politicians seeking public
attention would have given up their eye teeth for such a golden opportunity
to boost their ratings.
Tony Blair never gave a hoot for the victims of the London bombings. Not a
hoot. Take it from me, if Tony Blair had thought that his cross-country flight
would not serve his own political ambitions then he would not have undertaken it, no
matter how many people had died in the London bombings.
For example, this is the real Tony Blair ...
British Military Casualties Ignored Britain's
casualties keep on arriving; an average of four men and women a day since war
began. Families who feel ignored point out that the Prime Minister has yet to
visit a single injured soldier in a British hospital. Observer January
There is no political mileage to be gained by visiting wounded military
personnel, and so Tony Blair does not visit them!
No 'sympathy' for them!
Well, the same is true for the Gordon Browns of this world - and their wives.
They are self-serving frauds.
Gordon Brown's wife does not give a hoot about battered wives; what she cares
about is the social and career advancement of herself and her husband. And the
less effort required, the better!
That's the way that it works out there.
And, finally, I have pinched the following from a policeman's blog called
Cough The Lot. It describes the truth about
the allegedly enormous scale of serious domestic violence. It is mostly froth
and bubble ...
There is a poster in the loos at work referring to Domestic Incidents that starts with ‘Just a slap, Just a kick, Just a Domestic and so on until Just a murder’
I would like to add another line ‘Just another non-taxpayer using the police for personal gain in yet another petty row with their partner’
the majority of domestic related calls are made by
the people that regularly use the police as another tool in their never
I guess most forces have a policy of ‘Positive Intervention’ when it comes to intervening in domestic incidents. Now this is a good thing as it actually protects true victims that have suffered perhaps years of abuse and are frightened to do anything about it. However, the majority of domestic related calls are made by the people that regularly use the police as another tool in their never ending disputes.
[AH: i.e. they are mostly women using the police as a tool]
Last night was no different. Couple had argument, he takes their 10 month old son to his mums down the road. She calls the police stating she had been assaulted and her son kidnapped, bit of pushing - no visible injuries. She did actually provide a statement and we went straight round to nick him for
I have to take the baby from a 70 year old grandmother in tears because her son has been arrested and drop the kid back to the mother who is waiting around the corner.
she’s made a mistake and wants him back. Too late,
we have to interview now.
As soon as were back at the nick, get a call in custody and she would like to withdraw her statement, she’s made a mistake and wants him back. Too late, we have to interview now. He admits kicking out in frustration but she had slapped him prior and threatened that she would take their son and because it is domestic related it has to go to CPS direct which takes hours. He is eventually bailed with bail conditions not to return back to his home or to contact his wife for 7 days giving her time to make up her mind in terms of withdrawing evidence.
Now how has this helped either of them? She wants him back and has allready texted him as soon as we return his mobile phone. He cannot make contact or he will be arrested for breach of bail and will not be able to see his son without difficulty. This whole incident took nearly 5 hours to deal with.
There are always two sides to a story and although I don’t take sides, this course of action has not improved the situation for any party. Sometimes I wish that discretion of a police officer could be extended to domestic incidents but that decision has been taken away from us forever.