Men, Women and Chimps
Why is it so easy for women to manipulate men?
Why do women like the bad guys rather than the nice guys?
The answers from evolution are revealed below.
According to Dr Helen Fisher ...
millions of years, women worked. They came home with 60 to 80 per cent
of the evening meal - a double-income family was the rule.
Goodness! So women came home with 60 to 80 per cent
of the evening meal - for millions of years, eh?
Even Homo Erectus didn't quite
materialise until some 2 million years ago.
Helen Fisher must be a
We barely know how males and females
interacted with each other 100,000 years ago, let alone millions of
And look at this! ...
"Women are sturdier animals
because they have the most difficult job on Earth raising tiny, helpless
babies and performing a multiplicity of tasks concurrently."
Raising tiny helpless babies is the
most difficult job on Earth?
Even baboons do it!
In the jungle!
Every goddamn mammal on the planet
Dr Helen Fisher will surely soon be
telling us that menstruating is a sign of high intelligence and that
painting your fingernails regularly is a mark of genius.
But this kind of politically-correct
flimflam masquerading as science poisons and debases all academia these
days. And it is designed to demean men while
fraudulently bolstering the qualities of women.
Females of all species were,
apparently, always wonderful, and males were simply parasitic on them.
This has been the recurring theme, in
one way or another, since the 1970s.
Well. There is one thing that I am sure
about concerning both hominids and humans, and this is the fact that
females have been manipulating, deceiving and tricking their male
counterparts ever since they were chimpanzees.
women are the schemers, the phonies and the frauds
In comparison to males, females are the
schemers, the phonies and the frauds.
But they need to be this way.
Because females - whether they be chimpanzees
or humans - survive happily ONLY by manipulating males to do their
Let's think about chimpanzees for the
They live in troops dominated by a few
Well. Why do these alpha males bother
to hang around?
You got me there, Harry.
Why don't they just eat the baby
chimps and the female chimps (an easy source of food) and then go off
into the jungle to have a jolly good time eating bananas, chasing
small mammals and playing football?
Well. The reason is that there is an
inbuilt mechanism inside the brains of males that prevents them from
harming their females and children. This mechanism MUST exist.
And, at the very minimum,
this 'psychological' mechanism has a huge defensive currency from the
female's point of view.
And, of course, such a mechanism is
clearly evident in humans.
For example (and there are thousands
of examples like this throughout History) when William the Conqueror
invaded Britain and killed King Harold and his troops in 1066, and when
he later brutally suppressed those troublesome unhappy folk in the
rebellious north, the men and young boys were mostly killed.
The women, however, were not.
And this scenario has been repeated over
and over again since time immemorial.
There are definitely strong mechanisms that protect
females from the violence of males.
In a nutshell: There are definitely strong mechanisms
that protect females from the violence of males.
And human females certainly use their
knowledge of this to considerable manipulative advantage.
In the chimp world these mechanisms
save female chimps from being harmed by male chimps, and the very
presence of the male chimps within their troops also protects them and
their offspring from sources of danger that arise from other animals.
And, of course, the social and sexual
attractiveness of females has something to do with all this.
For example, when an aggressive-looking alpha male chimp approaches a
female, a typical response is for her to stick out her backside and
offer herself for sex. This diverts the aggressive male, and it appeases
him in some way - which is probably why he often behaves with apparent
aggression in the first place.
But this act of appeasement is also a
'turn on' for the females.
They love it!
Indeed, when female chimps are in
their estrus period they will gleefully copulate 40 or 50 times a day.
50 times a day!
Stop complaining Eric. Only 24 more to go.
then we can break for lunch.
In other words, not only do female chimps love
it, but they cannot manage even to take a half-an-hour break from it!
This is no hobby. This is an obsession.
An unbelievably insatiable addiction.
... human females also
love to appease dominant males.
And human females also
love to appease dominant males. And they are also clearly often very
excited by what we now call 'abuse'.
Look at the soap operas that they
love to watch, day after day; the books that they like to read, and the topics
that are continually being covered on their emotionally-charged chat shows.
They can't get enough of it!
Human females are obsessed with the idea
of being 'vulnerable'. They cannot stop wallowing in the idea of
themselves being 'abused'.
In other words, this must be one of the
biggest turn-ons in their emotional books.
But do they copulate 50 times a day?
Yes: but mostly in their heads - as they salivate over each emotional
syllable that emanates from Oprah's moist lips, as they turn hungrily to
the next page concerning the latest abuse scandal, as they sit there in their
living rooms - eyes wide, mouths open, brains dead - as the brute in the
soap opera slaps that poor woman's face; again and again and again.
But they love it!
Now let's just go back to the chimps
before I get carried away, and see how this works in terms of evolution to see how human females
got to be the scheming masochists that they are today.
For the sake of argument, imagine for
the moment that chimps are completely unable to think in any logical
way. Try to see them as automatons who respond purely on the basis of their
'feelings' - their 'emotions'.
For example, when chimps copulate, they
surely do it for some immediate reward of some sort (pleasure!). They
certainly do not realise that copulation leads to babies.
OK. So here we are in the jungle. And
the situation is this.
There are these very heavy muscular
aggressive alpha male chimps floating around the place and the smaller
females and their offspring somehow have to survive around them.
How on Earth do they achieve this
If, for example, they run away to live
on their own then they have had it. They will not survive on their own. And, of course, if they do not hang
around with male chimps then they will simply fail to reproduce.
Such females do not have a long lineage. They disappear from the
evolutionary tree very quickly.
In fact, the evolutionary success of
females and their lineages will be very much dependent on how effectively
they manage to entice the ALPHA males into copulating with them and
Indeed, it is not much use being a
female who copulates only with weak males. Females who copulate only
with weak males are going to reproduce weak males, and, to make matters
worse, weak males, in the presence of alpha males, do not have much hope
in the way of producing many future offspring.
Females who are 'turned on' by weak
males are not, therefore, going to produce a long lineage of
They are doomed!
females who are 'turned on' by aggressive males
... are going to make it big time!
On the other hand, females who are
'turned on' by aggressive males and who can manipulate such males
without being harmed by them are the outright winners. Their
descendants (and their genes) are going to make it big time!
Not only are they going to reproduce
strong males themselves, who will likely then go on to be future alpha
males, they are also going to reproduce the same kind of females. They
will produce females who have the same fabulous, scheming, manipulative abilities
as themselves - who have the same desires to copulate with alpha
males - and who will manage to gain the same kind of protection from
alpha males for their growing offspring.
The genes of these females will spread
and spread and spread.
And remember that none of these things
requires any 'conscious' or 'logical' intent. They can arise purely from emotional
responses and 'feelings' that have been 'selected for' by the process of
And those chimps who, by chance, have the
best combinations and whose youngsters inherit them are going to
dominate the future.
No forward planning is necessary.
In summary, here are the qualities
that will lead to female chimps bearing a long lineage.
1. The female chimps need to be
attracted to the alpha males, not to the weak ones.
2. They need to be able to attract the
alpha males into copulating with them.
3. They need to be able to manipulate
the alpha males into doing them no harm.
4. Better still, they need to
manipulate the alpha males into protecting them.
Female chimps and their descendants
without these qualities are doomed to extinction by being swamped by
those that have them.
In short, as far as female chimps are
concerned, being attracted to dominant males and being able to
manipulate them successfully for their own purposes is the key to
Indeed, they do not really have any
There is no other key!
there is much about human female behaviour that seems
to fall into place when one studies the behaviour of their chimpanzee
And, of course, given that the
emotional and feeling parts of the brains of human females
are not that much different from those of chimps, there is much about
human female behaviour that seems to fall into place when one studies
the behaviour of their chimpanzee counterparts.
Alpha male chimps, on the other hand,
do not need to be as complexly manipulative as females in order to
produce a long lineage. Their size and their ability to aggress with
impunity carry a lot of weight in any conversation.
Good gums. Good teeth. Yep: She'll do.
They do not need to 'attract' their
females. They have the ability to catch them, to threaten them, and to
have their wicked ways with them.
And this ability - derived, basically,
from their sheer size and strength - is also very useful when it comes
to keeping the weaker males out of the picture.
But apart from having size and
strength, there are two other qualities that will contribute very
strongly to the survival of a particular alpha male's lineage.
1. He needs to be very sexually
attracted to females and to cause them no harm despite his size. In
other words, he must be very much positively affected and appeased by
the signals that emanate from females.
2. The stronger is his sex drive and
the more females that he impregnates, the better!
There are, of course, some qualities
that will benefit the evolutionary success of both males and females.
For example, the more protective that they are toward their youngsters,
the more likely are their lineages to survive.
(However, male chimps do not seem
particularly concerned about their youngsters.)
But there are distinct differences
between male and female chimps when it comes to those qualities that are
significant in determining the longevity of their lineages.
The successful alpha male chimps
basically succeed on the basis of their brute strength - or the threat of
it - and their high sexual drives, and the successful female chimps
succeed by having sex with such beasts and by negotiating their way
The fundamental difference when it
comes to encounters between them is that the successful female chimps
need to be able both to attract and to control the behaviour of the alpha
male chimps (or they are in deep trouble evolutionary-wise) without
using force, whereas the reverse is not the case - after all, the alpha
males can simply have their wicked ways by force.
And it is important to notice that
female chimps who adopt a strategy of avoiding alpha males have little
hope of success. On the contrary, it is only those who will lurk around
in the vicinity of the alpha males that will be impregnated by them. And
given that female chimps cannot possibly understand the connection
between sex and the quality of their offspring, the ONLY reason that
they do lurk around near alpha males must be because they 'like' doing
Indeed - as we already know - they love it!
In fact, they love it about 50 times a
In other words, they really, really do like their alpha males.
But these female chimps are also
playing with fire. They must be able to give off signals that protect
themselves from attack. And the best way (in fact, the only
way) to do this is to appear to be as non-threatening as possible. And
the weaker and the more vulnerable that they look to the alpha male, the
less of a threat does the alpha male perceive them to be.
human females are rather like young children in many
And, putting it bluntly, this is why
human females are rather like young children in many respects - squeaky
voices, not much body hair, round bits, soft skin and, of course,
inexplicable tantrums. The idea is to look and act vulnerable - just like
Hi Honey-Bundle; some flowers for our first wedding anniversary.
From the alpha male's point of view,
of course, his lineage will do particularly well if he impregnates such
females. And he will give birth to sons who are sexually disposed
towards the very same kind of chimpanzee 'womenfolk' that he, himself,
was attracted to - i.e. the sons will also be attracted
to vulnerable-looking female chimps who lurk around them, entice them, and who blissfully proffer their
services in a non-threatening way.
Alpha males who have a different point
of view as to what constitutes 'attractiveness in females' will have a
much harder time in comparison. For example, if they were to prefer the
more dominant, the more threatening, the less readily available types of
female chimps (feminist chimps) their lineages, statistically speaking,
are just not going to make it.
There will be no hope for them!
But also notice that the males who ended
up producing long lineages were actually designed to be
manipulated by vulnerable-looking females. They were designed
to fall for all the hooplah.
Those that did not fall for all the female hooplah, did not make it.
That's right Guys.
You were actually designed by
Nature to be stupid and a complete and utter imbecile when it comes to
You were actually born that way.
And Boy, does it show!
And so it is that chimps have evolved
to be the way they are.
The males are highly sexual and
aggressive and they particularly like to have sex with females who lurk
around them looking weak and non-threatening.
The females get their kicks out of having sex with
The females get their kicks out of
having sex with alpha males whom they need to attract (the males do not
need to attract, they can threaten to use force) and around whom they
have to negotiate their way with skill.
Indeed, this seems to be one of their
main pleasures in life.
50 times a day.
Male chimps compete with each other for access to the females by
way, mostly, of aggression and intimidation.
The females compete with each other for
the alpha males by trying to be the most attractive and the most
available to them, and by appearing to be the least threatening toward
them; i.e. the most vulnerable to them.
Well. The above is an extremely
simplified version of the chimpanzee mating game. Their social
structures are much more complex than indicated.
For example, the alpha
males do not spend much of their time chasing away the weaker males. In
fact, the males mostly get on quite well with each other; with the
occasional grunt passing for chatter.
(So, not much in the way of human male evolution there!)
females are not constantly vying with each other over access to these
alpha males. Though, strangely, the females do not actually communicate with each other much.
And there are complex social
hierarchies that exist both within and between the genders that
fluctuate and change with time.
Nevertheless, on balance, the
successful lineages will derive from the intimate goings-on between the strongest
males and the females who are the most able and willing to consort with
the female's route to evolutionary success does
not depend so much upon her physical strength but upon her ability to manipulate
And the main point being made here is
that the female's route to evolutionary success does not depend so much
upon her physical strength but upon her ability to manipulate
the strongest males to her own advantage through the various signals
that she presents to them.
And, further, the more weak and vulnerable
that she appears to be, the more attractive will she be to the males.
(Remember that if there were any male chimps who, in fact, preferred the
more feisty females who always said, "No," and who fought like
tigers to escape from their amorous advances, well, they would have died
out long before. Such male chimps would not have left many descendants. Only those males
who sought (enjoyed) the company of compliant females made
to Brown, who is affiliated with the ISR Evolution and Human Adaptation
Program, the current findings are consistent with earlier research
showing that expressions of vulnerability enhance female attractiveness.)
And if we move the evolutionary clock
forward by some 6 million years to where we are today, as humans, we can
surely see similarities between the behavioural inclinations of members
of our own species and those of chimpanzees.
human males are very much attracted to what
appear to be weak and vulnerable females
For example, human females remain very
attracted to dominant males, and human males are very much attracted to what
appear to be weak and vulnerable females. And all this appears to be
something that is embedded deep within our natures.
But there is something else that
happened throughout our own evolution - the development of a complex
And language is a system through which
members who speak and understand it can influence each other. And this
is one of the main purposes of language. It is, fundamentally, a tool of
manipulation. Its purpose is to allow users of it to affect the
attitudes and behaviours of others.
There is no point in talking to a
piece of flint and telling it to shape itself into an arrow head. It
does not matter how much you verbally abuse that piece of wood. It will
not shape itself into a spear, no matter how much you shout at it.
Language is a tool that allows users
of it to manipulate other users. It is not a tool that can
operate directly on objects in the environment.
And in much the same way that female
chimps needed to develop their non-verbal manipulative skills in order to
negotiate successfully with the alpha males with whom they wished to
mate and to live amongst, so it is that human females have also
developed greater language skills than males in order to
achieve more or less the same ends.
(Female chimps are also much more
expressive verbally than are male chimps. And while chimp 'language' is
fairly minimal, it is very effective in expressing basic emotions -
fear, rage, joy etc - through various yelps, hoots and screeches. Yep.
Even male chimps have to put up with all the histrionic verbiage of
their moody females while remaining mostly silent on the issues.)
Nope: I'm not listening.
humans now consist of two genders, one of which - the
female one - is extremely adept at manipulating the other
And so it is that humans now consist
of two genders, one of which - the female one - is extremely adept at
manipulating the other through means other than sheer force.
And it seems that human females now
have the upper hand in a number of ways.
1. They clearly have much stronger
non-verbal manipulative mechanisms than do males.
2. They have developed greater
language skills with which to manipulate others.
3. They have had millions of years in
which to refine such skills.
4. Even the mildest use of 'force' or the threat of it (a male's
manipulative tool in the gender war)
have increasingly been outlawed.
So. What hope have men got, eh?
It is noteworthy that this
ability of females to manipulate males is not necessarily a mark of
'intelligence' by any means. For example, when a wife cajoles or seduces
her husband into fixing the computer, she requires far less in the way of
intelligence than does he in order to achieve her aims.
She merely requires the ability to manipulate him.
And in the chimp world, alpha male
chimps will very often give females some of their freshly-caught meat in
exchange for a bit of sex.
But when one looks closely at the
question of who is getting the best deal out of any exchanges, it is
surely legitimate to focus on what skills, what effort, and what intelligence were
required to gain the wherewithal to make them.
Well. The male chimp had to rush off
somewhere into places unknown in order to seek out, catch, and then kill
the prey, whereas the female chimp simply had to bend over.
That's not a fair exchange!
That male chimp has been suckered!
Hmm. I think I've been suckered.
Indeed, in western societies today the
divorcing wives of wealthy men frequently manage to acquire huge wealth
simply by having done little more than having allowed themselves to be
provided with the most privileged and most pampered of lifestyles for a
And this kind of grossly unbalanced
type of exchange has clearly predominated in the world of gender
relations among both chimps and humans.
And the astonishing amount of effort,
time and money that human females put into altering the
way that they look in order to manipulate the males around them
surely tells us where their real skills, motivations and their conscious
men in the western world are not aware of just
how manipulative are their women
Unfortunately, however, men in the
western world are not aware of just how manipulative are their women.
And there are two main reasons for this.
1. The feminist-indoctrinated media
have gone out of their way to hide the various ploys of women while
highlighting those of men. (For example, they claim that women 'do not
lie about rape' - which they do, by the thousand - and that men are rarely victims of domestic
violence - which they are, by the million.)
There is, therefore, little consciousness raising among western men
about the ways in which they are constantly being manipulated by women.
2. One of the requisites for being a
good manipulator is the ability to hide the fact that you are
manipulating. And, needless to say, this ability to hide one's
manipulative intent is very strongly developed in females. And it has
to be this way. Without the ability to hide the fact that one is
manipulating, there is no point in learning how to manipulate!
Indeed, women begin to manipulate every morning
as soon as they sit in front of the mirror.
the well-honed manipulative ability of women was
clearly recognised by most of the great religions
In fact, the well-honed manipulative
women was clearly recognised by most of the great religions throughout
most of history, and the various coverings that many women today are
forced to wear in some societies dominated by religion are specifically
designed in order to reduce this ability to manipulate.
And so when one considers the human
species as consisting of two different groups of individuals competing
with each other for survival (and for comfort) it is quite clear that
the females (especially in the west) have been winning hands down for
quite some time.
And it is men who now
need 'liberating' not women.
Indeed, it is the men who get sent off
to die in battle. It is the men who end up doing all the arduous,
difficult and dangerous jobs. It is the men who end up in prisons. It is
the men who get blamed for everything. And so on and so on.
Indeed, as civilisation has marched
onwards, particularly in the west, the females have become
increasingly empowered - empowered at the expense of the males;
the feminists hijacked the mainstream media in
order to stir up hatred toward men.
And in the past many decades, women
have successfully managed to further empower themselves hugely through
the added means of mass communications technologies.
The best example of
this, needless to say, was the manner in which the feminists hijacked
the mainstream media in order to stir up hatred toward men. Their
ability to manipulate and deceive through visual images and language was
increased enormously by the hierarchical way in which the media were
structured at the time. This huge extra advantage gained by having so
much effective control through the media is, of course, still operating,
but, thankfully, it is now being undermined by the internet and by the
growth of the men's movement. And the skilful manner in which women
manipulate men for their own purposes (as well as the deceits that are necessarily
involved in doing this) are now being increasingly exposed.
And, as this happens, one imagines
that increasing numbers of men will not take too kindly to what they
However, none of the above is to
suggest that men do not attempt to manipulate women. They surely do.
1. Men are more often seeking
something from women that is very easy to provide (e.g. sex and/or
affection) as opposed to something that requires a huge continuing
effort (e.g. earning a lot of money).
2. They are nowhere nearly as adept at
manipulation as are women - either verbally or non-verbally.
3. Men rarely think about using much
in the way of manipulation as a tool when it comes to inter-gender
interactions - and certainly not to anywhere near the same extent as do
women; e.g. they rarely put on make-up, they rarely flash their legs or
look tearful when a police officer has just stopped them for speeding,
and they rarely spend a fortune on their underwear!
And if we think very carefully about the world, both now and in the past, the
evidence surely tells us that there is barely an object or an idea that has been
conceived, created, constructed or manufactured by humans that has not been
conceived, created, constructed or manufactured by men.
Look around the room that you are in.
There is scarcely an item that has been conceived, created, constructed or
manufactured by women.
Not even the bricks.
western women still
manage successfully to portray themselves as being superior to their men
And yet western
women still manage successfully to portray themselves as being
superior to their men and continually worthy of special privileges and
Well. Quite clearly. This would
simply not be possible were it not for their astonishing skills when it
comes to manipulation.
Furthermore, even though it
is men who make
up the vast majority of victims when it comes to violence, crime,
homelessness, physical and mental illness, premature death, suicide,
war, accidents at work, loss of home, loss of children and, indeed, when
it comes to most other things, it is
the case that women victims get most of the attention, most of the
sympathy and most of the funding.
And so, once again. This would
simply not be possible were it not for their astonishing skills when it
comes to manipulation.
The skills that women have, and the
ones that they are most predisposed to use, do not cure diseases. They
do not make important discoveries. They do not tap the resources of the
earth. They do not even build houses.
Their skills are mostly aimed toward
And most western women clearly both
recognise and understand this and use this to their advantage from a very
early age. ...
+ UK Women
are taking more time and trouble over their underwear and spending a
small fortune in the process. Here we meet five women who spend more on
their lingerie than they do on the rest of their wardrobes.
+ UK More
than nine out of 10 of the girls believe it should be up to their
husbands to provide for them.
"According to a survey of
5,000-plus teenage girls, their main ambition is to complete university
then return to the homestead - whether their partners like it or not."
Leviticus 12 1:6 If a woman have
conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven
days; ... But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two