Angry Harry

Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism

Recent comments from some emails - mostly from men - which can be viewed in full here. ...

"I cannot thank you enough."

"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."

"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."

"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "

"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."

"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."

"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."

"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."

"It is terrific to happen upon your website."

"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."

"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)

"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)

"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."

"You are worth your weight in gold."

"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."

"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"

"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."

"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."

"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."

"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."

"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

Rape Baloney

Harriet Harman Sucks

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.

                               

Harriet Harman 

Harriet Harman 

Dishonest and Deceitful 

 

Harman Claims F4J Stunts Are "Vile" In parliament, Ms Harman condemned the pressure group, agreeing with Labour MP Anne Moffat that their "vile" stunts did their case "absolutely no good".

harmanh@parliament.uk

Dear Ms Harman

This is on my website 

...

Ardent feminist and man-hater Harriet Harman has the nerve to suggest that the two F4J activists sitting on a roof are engaged in 'vile' stunts.

And yet, this is a woman who applauds and praises the suffragettes! - a group of women who smashed shop windows, damaged artwork, tied themselves to railings and issued white feathers to men to label them as cowards if they were not in the military.

Two men sitting on a roof!

A 'vile' stunt! 

Tell me - all you women out there - which would be more important to you - having a vote every four years, or being able to see your children?

And - because I will never let you forget it - she is responsible for the deaths, debilitation and orphaning of thousands of Iraqi children.

This is one pretty disgusting human being - in my view.

...

Best wishes

Harry

webmaster at angryharry.com

...........................................

Harriet Harman seems to have spent a lifetime inflaming hatred towards men. In other words, she is a stirrer up of hatred towards an entire group people.

Thus, Harriet Harman is a bigot, a sexist and a misandrist.

Harriet Harman is a hypocrite - as per above

Harriet Harman has been caught deceiving the public over domestic violence and sex-assault issues.

In other words, Harriet Harman is a liar.

Harriet Harman is also a cheat - as evidenced by the fact that she hid from her own colleagues the huge amount of money that she was putting in towards her campaign for deputy leadership of the Labour Party.

Harriet Harman also kills people - as demonstrated by her support of the bombing campaign over Iraq which maimed and killed many innocent men, women and children.

And yet Harriet Harman has the audacity to claim that two men sitting peacefully on a roof is a 'vile' stunt.

This woman is truly sickening.

Surely, people should keep asking themselves how it is that such a disgusting woman has remained in high office for so long.

And the answer to this question is really quite simple.

Harriet Harman is not much different from most of the other Labour politicians who have been sitting in government these past many years.

These people are corrupt to the core.

They are self-serving, greedy, dishonest, and highly ambitious. They will do anything to remain in power.

And they will do this even if it means messing up your entire life.

Please wake up.

Finally, getting back to this thoroughly obnoxious woman, Harriet Harman, it is quite clearly the case that, in her mind, the right for a woman to vote every four years or so - a single vote which is almost worthless in the scheme of things - is actually more important than the right for a father to see his own children;  and vice-versa.

That is a true indication of how much she hates men. That is a true indication of how worthless she considers men to be.

In her eyes, a man is so unimportant that even being with his own children is actually worth less than a woman having the right to one, single, almost worthless vote every few years.

The latter entitles women - the suffragettes - to cause mayhem and destruction - something which Harriet Harman applauds - but the former does not entitle men even to sit peacefully on a roof - something which Harriet Harman considers to be 'vile'.

But, surely, there is not a normal man or woman in this country who would believe that having a single vote every few years is more important than being with one's own children. 

So how on Earth does Harriet Harman get away with this?

Well, I'll tell you.

There are two reasons.

1. As a result of the hatred towards men that the activities of feminists like Harriet Harman have inspired in the public over the years, men like you really are considered to be well and truly worthless.

2. Most of you men reading this are utterly pathetic.

...

The suffragettes ...

... burned down churches as the Church of England was against what they wanted; 

... vandalised Oxford Street, breaking most of the windows in the street; 

... chained themselves to Buckingham Palace as the Royal Family were seen to be against women having the right to vote; 

... hired out boats, sailed up the Thames and shouted abuse through loud hailers at Parliament as it sat; 

... refused to pay their taxes

... vandalised golf courses

... attacked politicians as they went to work and firebombed their homes.  

But two men sitting peacefully on a roof because they cannot see their own children is a 'vile' stunt according to Harriet Harman.

Now, I know that most of you reading this are probably thicker than two short planks, and you cannot understand what I am saying, but, make no mistake, this revolting woman really does believe that a father's right to see his own children - and they, him - is worth less than the right of a woman to cast an almost insignificant vote every four years.

Both her words and her actions demonstrate very clearly that this is the case.

Harriet Harman is pis#ing all over you. 

And laughing about it.

According to the newspapers, she was recently making jokes about men leaving the country because of her reputation. For example, ...

Joking at her reputation as a feminist, she replied, "all the men would want to flee the country". She then went on to praise Mr Brown as a man of "true grit". 

But she blasted as "vile" the protest by dads' rights campaigners on the roof of her South London home yesterday
. Link

So. There you have it.

She is part of a government that is stopping thousands of fathers and children from seeing each other - indeed, doing her very best to break down their relationships on many fronts - and she is having a good laugh about it.

More About Man-Hater Harriet Harman In an extraordinary interview published yesterday, she declared marriage was 'irrelevant' to public policy and described high rates of separation as a 'positive development', as it reflected 'greater choice' for couples - never mind the children. Leo McKinstry

If nothing else, Harman can be credited with consistency. Neither the facts nor the passage of time have changed her mind. She was preaching this dangerous gospel of feminist fascism when she was first elected to Parliament in 1982. 

When I came to work for her as a parliamentary aide in the early Nineties, Harman was questioning whether fathers were necessary at all. 

... She could also be odd about money. At one stage she decided to employ a media negotiator to enhance her earnings from routine broadcast appearances - unheard of in Whitehall. 

It was a tactic that backfired when an outraged ITV company leaked to the Press her substantial demand for a fee. The negotiator was no more
.

... I have become increasingly disillusioned. I can now see what aggravates so many people about her: the politically correct condescension; smug self-certainty despite a record of incompetence; the whiff of born-to-rule arrogance; the attachment to the shibboleths of multi-culturalism and feminism. 

Harman is the embodiment of so much that is wrong with New Labour. Born into affluent privilege herself, Harman is that classic socialist type that regards the robust British working class with suspicion. 

But Harriet's greatest vice - and there are many - is her hypocrisy
.

Fathers are an irrelevance.

Got that?

(But, of course, her children have a father.)

Marriage is 'irrelevant'.

Got that?

(But, in fact, she is married.)

And a high rate of relationship and marriage breakdown is, according to Harriet Harman, a "positive development".

Got that?

(She is actually admitting that she sees broken families as a "positive development".)

In other words, she actually wants to see more families break down.

So. Is it finally sinking into your empty heads - at last - that Harriet Harman and her 'socialist' cronies in government really are doing their level best to break down families? And, further, that they are doing this both purposely and consciously.

Breaking down families is their intention.

Indeed, to this end, Harriet Harman and her cronies have done everything that they possibly can over the years in order to achieve this aim.

And, amongst other things, this has included their purposeful and persistent stirring up of hatred in women and children towards men, together with the stacking of prejudice upon prejudice against men throughout the justice system - in order to make it easier to debilitate men wherever they are involved in relationships with women and children.

Also see Harriet Harman - Solicitor General - to be prosecuted?

And www.HarrietHarmanSucks.Com 

 

The so-called 'oppression' of women ...









click a picture

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?