04/07/04
What is AH doing about his adult site? - a few people have asked ...
LOL!
Well. No. I haven't yet set up AH's adult site to channel sneakily zillions of male
sex-seekers into areas of the men's movement. I've been too busy!
But I should emphasise that the setting up of such a thing is not simply to
do with the desire to open channels between the adult industry and
that of men's activism.
No Sirree!
There is much more to it than that!
What also needs to be done via the sex industry is to help to promote within the
minds of the zillions of men who engage with it a psychology that, for example,
rejects the notion that feminist women are of any value to them.
(Indeed, they are positively harmful to them in very many ways.)
And if more men can be persuaded to reject such women openly and vociferously
then women,
themselves, will start to change their own attitudes.
This would happen because both men and women (especially when young) have a tendency to want to make
themselves attractive to the opposite sex. And if men strongly reject women with
feminist tendencies and attitudes then, quite simply, women will less likely
adopt them.
And given that what is sexually attractive to men can be moulded to quite a large
degree - particularly if it is consistent with 'biology' - then adult sites that produce this sort of thing ...


... need to be promoted more than those that produce this sort of thing...


Sure. It is only sexual fantasy.
But sexual fantasy runs deep!
Furthermore, of course, there are far more women who would actually fit the
first category above in the real world than would fit the second
category.
It is only because feminism and political correctness hide women in the
former category that they are not oft-injected into the minds of people.
And, unhappily, the posting on websites of such pictures - of either category
- attracts a far, far, far greater male audience than do even my most masterful
of pontifications.
LOL!
And so, in summary, when I do finally get my act together on this matter, I
will not simply be trying to create channels between the men's websites and the
adult industry, i will also be trying to influence the attitudes of men with
regard to what constitutes a sexually-attractive woman!
And I shall probably also be doing with pictures what Henry Makow often does
with words - to annoy the feminists, if nothing else.
(For those of you who have not read Henry's views on such matters, he
believes that men and women are best fulfilled - and were designed thus - when
the latter fully submit to the authority of the former - which sounds
pretty good to me!)
In truth, however, I am not particularly bothered who 'wears the
trousers' when it comes to relationships, or, indeed, when it comes to running
governments or corporations.
What does irritate me deeply, however, is the way in which men
who wear the trousers in their relationships are demonised (they're abusing their partners, they're
holding back women etc etc) and they are also very
heavily discriminated against, in one way or another.
The heterosexual male who is dominant over his partner has been continually under attack for far
too long. And he is supposed to squirm in shame for his poor attitudes.
On the other hand, the dominant heterosexual female, and the dominant homosexual male or female,
seem to have been lauded to the hilt over the past three decades.
Well. It is about time that all this changed.
Indeed, I find that I am beginning to have more respect for the men fighting
on behalf of Al-Quaeda than I do for most western males these days -
particularly our treacherous male politicians.
These self-serving creeps are doing far more damage to our societies and to
men in particular than ever has Osama Bin Laden and his cronies - and,
unbelievably, we continue to let them get away with it!
They deny seriously ill people access to drugs that would alleviate their
suffering.
They are gradually taking away the rights of people to govern their own lives
in order to fill their own coffers and those of their cronies.
They are purposefully undermining their countries and their peoples by
supporting wholesale immigration.
They are supporting feminist policies that are reducing the populations of
their very own people while other peoples are increasing theirs.
They seek to force men who have been defrauded with regard to their paternity
to continue paying for children who are not theirs.
They are employing policies that discriminate against men in just about every
important area of their lives; family, employment, health, law etc etc.
They are creating laws that place all men at the mercy of any false
allegations that come their way and, worse, they actually encourage such false
allegations to be made against them.
They have stacked the justice system against men in order to be able to
persecute more of them - even for trivial offences.
They are taking some 50% of all that men earn in order to boost their own
power.
And I could go on.
But, incredibly, so effective has their deceptive propaganda been, that men
are still actually voting for them!
And the only way that most men will begin to see what is going on is for
their attention to be diverted away from what goes on in the mainstream media - which
are controlled by the feminists, the women's groups and the far greater spending
power of women - and pointed in a direction which shows them just how much they
are being deceived and suckered.
But therein lies the biggest problem.
How does one attract their attention?
It is not an easy thing to do.
But this sort of thing might work! ...

LOL!
But the serious point is this.
'Men' do not really have a voice. And, unlike the feminists and the women's
groups, those who wish to battle politically on behalf of men are not funded
with millions of dollars. They have very little in the way of resources, and the
forces stacked against them are positively huge.
As such, they are forced into a position where they have to attract attention
by more extreme means - protesting outside the homes of family court judges,
climbing cranes and bridges, painting the doors of government buildings,
throwing purple powder at Tony Blair, going on hunger strikes, etc etc.
Well. I see myself as an internet activist.
And, for me, running an adult-oriented website in order to draw attention
would be the equivalent of climbing up cranes and bridges.
And it is not something that I feel particularly comfortable with.
But the possible benefits are simply too great to ignore - especially if
other men's internet activists can be encouraged to do the same.
And I have reached the stage where it is becoming impossible for me to
reconcile my utter outrage at what various organisms are doing with the fact
that I actually have the ability to attack them with a far greater force than
that which I currently employ.
And this is why, my friends, angryharry might well be updated with less
material in the near future.
I have some thinking to do, some planning to undertake and some
investigations to make.
I have my own cranes and bridges to climb!
And I am planning to set up two or three more
sites in the near future in order to create a trail in cyberspace that leads
male surfers in the direction of men's sites such as this one.
And, quite frankly, it is not that difficult to do.
I have a program that I can script to enable me to copy and paste text and
hyperlinks into any webpage that I choose with just the pressing of a few keys.
And so, for example, if I was now to type the three letters 'pme' followed by
two spaces, my computer would automatically copy and paste the previous
paragraph together with an associated hyperlink link directly on to the Men's
Issues page. Three further keystrokes would save and close that
page, and then bring me back right here.
On the other hand, If I was to type "pge" followed by two spaces,
the aforementioned operations would be carried out automatically as before, but
this time the paragraph and its associated hyperlink would end up on The Gentler
Sex page.
And if I do this sort of thing when I am visiting a webpage - say, a news
article - then the very same thing happens.
Voila!
The selected paragraph and link are posted where they need to go.
Basically, therefore, running many websites simultaneously is not much more
complicated nor much more time-consuming than just running one.
One can automate many of the processes involved.
I also use Opera as a browser. It is much better than Internet Explorer. (Here
is a fan's guide to it.)
And here are some things that it allows me to do.
I can zap **all** pictures off the screen instantly by pressing the letter
'g' - which saves a good deal of aggravation when it comes to sites where
pictures - particularly moving ones - get in the way.
I can often look at a series of pictures one after the other - without having
to return to the page that linked to them.
I can increase or decrease the magnification of the page being viewed very
quickly indeed, which means that I can adjust all text and pictures to suit my
eyesight. This is impossible with Internet Explorer - which often does not seem
able even to change the size of the text. With Opera, everything just gets
magnified.
I can pop up a note system and quickly type or copy text into it. I can even
transfer directly text from a webpage into the notes section, and, just as
fabulously, if I ever click on a note to view it again, it will - should I so
desire - automatically take me right back to the webpage from which I created
the note!
(Searching the notes section is also very quick and easy.)
Opera can easily be set to block pop-ups and cookies etc etc.
You can customise all the keyboard shortcuts (of which there are many) to
suit yourself.
And, of course, I imagine that it is far less vulnerable to the machinations
of hackers who are mostly too busy targeting security flaws in Internet
Explorer.
And there are many other goodies too!
Anyway.
Once the 'political' wing of the men's movement has established sufficient
links (psychological and webwise) to parts of the adult industry, the
evaporation of feminism and its associated ills will be accelerated most
dramatically.
Just you wait and see!
And not even 'the censors' will be able to do anything about this - but I
cannot be bothered right now to explain why.
(However, if you have read AH's Canadian Feminists Getting Worried,
you will have a pretty good idea why this symbiotic linkage cannot be stopped
from taking place.)
Nevertheless, time is running out. The longer that it takes for the men's
movement to become strong, the worse for all of us will it be.
Or, even worse than that worse, we could all end up like this! ...
Muzzled Male! As a
happily muzzled male I am in complete agreement that being muzzled is the best
way for a man to live and the key to a happy marriage for both partners.
LOL!
But do not worry boys.
In the not-too-distant future, men-who-sit-at-screens will disempower all the
bad men and arrange matters so that fewer of them materialise into our midst.
The male-female birth-ratio will be altered, and women will become real women.
Well.
Almost!

LOL!
AH