|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism
Recent comments from some emails - mostly from
men - which can be viewed in full
here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of
them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own
sanity in a world gone mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for
years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools
And Feminists
Women -
Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
Rape Baloney
Harriet
Harman Sucks
Are you an
intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then
please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable
and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of
the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your
intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism
for yourself.
| |
|
Bits and Bobs 1
UK The
father of two teenagers who claims they have been caught up in drugs, joyriding
and loutish behaviour has "named and shamed" them on the internet in
an attempt to stop them falling into lives of crime. And quite right too!
Though, no doubt, the law will soon stop this sort of thing.
AH must therefore act quickly.
He too must shame those two layabouts of his
before it is too late!
They must be paraded in front of the world so
that people can see what an early lifetime of clubbin', boozin' an' gawpin' at
the TV screen has done to their blackened hearts, their withered souls and their
ever-expanding backsides.
Yes. Yes. He shall take photographs of their
bedrooms and put them on the internet to show people what untidy tips they are.
Knickers, bras, shoes, tights, blouses, jerseys, jumpers, make-up and other
paraphernalia, magazines, books (Did AH say books? Pah! In his dreams. Forget
books.) socks, CDs, CD covers, wires, electronic stuff, hairdryers, hair
curlers, hair brushes, hair straighteners, more shoes, nail varnish, dirty mugs,
dirty plates, dirty cutlery, old food, old drinks, bottles, fag ends,
photographs and sweat-infested laundry.
And that's just the stuff on their beds!
Yes. Yes. AH shall collect all the evidence,
and on the internet it will go!
He'll show those brazen hussies who's the
boss!
|
|
Canada She's
widely considered to be one of the top female hockey players in the world, but
Canadian Hayley Wickenheiser is about to find out if she has what it takes to
play with the boys in the big leagues.
Women playing hockey? - with the boys!?
Ho. Ho. Ho.
What. A. Hoot!
In his younger days AH oftentimes played field
hockey (not ice hockey) against the 'gals' teams from the local schools.
Whack. Whack. Whack. Went the boys.
Dribble. Doogle. Dangle. Went the girls.
Zoom. Wallop. Crash. Went the boys.
Tiddly Here. Tiddly There. Went the girls.
What. A. Farce.
And the referees were always
biased!
Foul! Offside! Dangerous Play! Penalty! Went
the referees if AH even so much as glanced at the ball.
Well Done. Good Shot. Clever Girl. They went
whenever the ball happened to glance accidentally off one of the girls' sticks -
or off one of their knees or their ankles, or even better, their heads.
And that was the referees!
And the spectators were just as bad.
Boo! Hiss! Throw him off the field! They
chanted.
Excellent Play! First Class! Give her a medal!
They sang.
Take it from AH, this misandry started up a
very long time ago.
|
|
Dear All
Last Wednesday, an email turned up with no
message in it. The subject header just contained one word.
"Idiots"
Hmm, I thought.
It came from a man called -
well, I'll just give you his initials - MW.
Was this a message for me? Or had someone
failed to enclose a URL to an article about some "idiots". Presumably,
feminists of some sort.
I decided on the former.
I pressed the REPLY button, changed the
subject header to "Arseholes," and SENT it back whence it came.
Some minutes later an email came back.
"Your website is a joke," it said.
Hmm. A typical left-wing political correctoid,
I thought, with no real ability to think very deeply, and, therefore, not
capable of doing very much except trying to intimidate and denigrate with
hostile emails.
I looked more closely at the name and the
email address. It came from an American University.
Off I went to Google.
Two minutes later I had found a page
containing the man's name and his picture.
He worked at a biogenetics facility providing
research data for the University.
Also on the page was a list and a set of
photographs of all the staff at the facility.
OK, I thought. Let's see what happens.
I wrote back and said, "Take a look at
these two articles." And I enclosed the URLs of the two articles about the
biologist Steven Jones - who reckons that men are 'parasites'. Perhaps if he
read these he would understand why men's websites such as angryharry were not so
stupid.
"No thank you," came the reply.
Well, that was it, as far as I was concerned.
People who turn up uninvited out of the blue simply to be rude to me do not
deserve my sympathy.
And so this is what I sent to five of his
colleagues - which included the head of the facility and the systems
administrator. And, of course, I sent MW himself a CC of this email.
Dear Sirs
I would be grateful if you would ask your
colleague MW to refrain from using your facility for posting insulting and
inflammatory emails to me and my colleagues.
I do not know who he is and have never
heard of him.
However, his emails seem to emanate from
your department.
Yours Faithfully
Three emails came back.
The first one was from MW.
Please stop spamming this facility/my email
address or other colleagues....... My colleagues are aware of your comments.....
He sounded worried.
I made no reply.
The second one - about 15 minutes later - was
also from MW.
Any more spams or emails to this scientific
research facility will be handled accordingly, as the system admins have been
informed about your emails, and language. Somebody wrote "Arseholes"
as a heading to an email directed to my account. Would that be you? Please do
take this seriously. My colleagues are all in the same offices and are informed.
Hopefullly this is the last warning
Notice how he conveniently forgets to mention
that he was the first to send an insulting email. He was clearly intending to
suggest to his colleagues that, for some reason, I had simply popped up from
nowhere and sent him an insulting email.
"Oh dear, all this sudden activity
suggests that he's getting rather worried," I thought. But I made no reply.
After all, I have better things to do. And MW seemed satisfactorily flustered.
But then, a third email arrived.
My name is D and I'm a System Administrator
here at XXX. What exactly has MW been sending from XXX. I need something
tangible to start looking into an investigation.
D
Hmm. Well, I didn't want to stir the pot any
further lest MW actually got into any significant trouble. After all, even I
have been known to fire off an insulting email or two and realised, later, that
I have been far too unfair by reacting on impulse. (Frontal lobe failure!)
So I replied to the Systems Administrator and
asked him to forget about the affair. Unfortunately, I didn't keep a copy of my
own email, so I can't re-post it here, but, in it, I admitted that I was simply
teaching MW a lesson by emailing some of his colleagues because, for some
unknown reason, he had turned up uninvited and been rude to me, and that,
perhaps, he will now think twice before sending out insulting emails from his
workplace.
And the moral of this story, my friends, is
that if you use your workplace email address, be careful! And, of course, should
you receive any hostile emails from someone who is using their own workplace
address, then you can often teach them an excellent lesson by going to Google
and finding out who their bosses are.
But also remember that this emailing business
makes it all too easy to act impulsively. And things that people say in the heat
of the moment do not necessarily reflect how they really would feel once they
have thought about matters more deeply.
AH
|
|
ZZZZZZZZZ !
Three
new recruits get ready for inspection by Angry Harry at his new Anti-Feminist
Military Training Camp!
|
|
USA Galled
by a court ruling last year that let two men get away with pointing cameras up
women's skirts in public, Washington state legislators are proposing updated
anti-voyeurism laws to outlaw the practice.
Outrageous!
There is nothing that AH loves better than to
wander around Oxford Street with a camera concealed inside his duffle coat to
digitally record most surreptitiously the legs and sweaty undergarments of all
those sumptuous women wearing skirts.
The light from the flash bulb often causes him
problems though.
Only the most feeble-minded of women and the most
elderly of them tend not to notice it.
But, never mind. Anything will do.
A leg is a leg after all!
USA So
far, the burglar has struck 14 times over the past two years - shunning
household valuables and sneaking off with women's panties.
And if this heinous criminal should be one of
AH's regular readers, here is a message for him.
"You are definitely ill! Send those
panties immediately to AH, and he will return them forthwith or thereabouts to
their rightful owners."
|
|
Poetry Competition
Win $100!
Yo!
Well, not quite poetry.
AH can't imagine many poets
lurking around on the men's websites.
He has certainly never come
across any.
But you never know!
Anyway. Jack
Kammer reckons that men can do anything when they put their minds to it, and
AH's readers have to prove him correct on this. For
details of the competition go to
RulyMob and then see if you can apply your talents to making some words
rhyme.
The title, however, you are not
allowed to choose. It
is, "If I only had a V."
Where V stands for Vagina, of
course! This is not as
trivial as it may sound. The
American feminists have been having some success in transforming Valentine's
Day into a day for promoting a heightened awareness of Violence against women -
as if we needed any more reminding. In
other words, a day which is supposed to be special to couples who want to
celebrate their love for each other is being hijacked and soured by feminists
who want to use it as yet another vehicle for promoting their foul propaganda
against men. As is
typical, these revolting women want to use the day to promote male hatred
and they want women to continue to see themselves as perpetual victims. They
want the country shrouded in hatred toward men on Valentines Day. So,
have a go! Make
yourself a cup of tea. Put on some good music. And
get composing! Let's
fight these bitches with our poetry!
|
|
If I Only Had a V
If
I only had a V
I could be accusatory
And hide in anonymity
Despite my obvious perjury.
If I only had a V
I could live so happily
Causing untold agony
To the man who married me.
If I only had a V
I would be officially
protected by immunity
With no responsibility.
If I only had a V
I would dress most prettily
And all of the judiciary
Would judge my claims most favourably.
If I only had a V
I would use it expertly
To generate equality
That somehow always favours me.
If I only had a V
I could act appallingly
And cause my partner misery
No matter how atrociously.
If I only had a V
I would stroke it tenderly
Because quite unbelievably
It is my gold-filled treasury.
...
Yo!
But I didn't win the prize. Down
with Jack Kammer!
|
|
Subject: So f**k you AH
I am all over the short wave radio today.
Last I looked, like 1 minute ago
I was listened to by over 2.5 million on air.
All at one time.
So f**k you AH
Love R
Subject: f**k you too!
What about running your own website?
YOU LAZY SOD!
AH
(Ah yes. Behind the scenes, AH and his
chums have the most meaningful and intellectual of conversations.)
|
|
Equality
|
|
USA Should
Men Still Be Expected To Pay For Dates? Glenn Sacks
No way should men be expected to
pay for dates!
In fact, women should be grateful that they
actually get any dates these days.
And if any woman out there wants a date with
Angry Harry, she will have to pay for the whole evening - and that includes all
his traveling expenses + $5 per hour + extra payments for any of those 'special
services' that she might be panting for after experiencing his most succulent
presence and having suckled on his moist aura.
No Sirreee. The days when men pay for dates
are definitely over.
|
|
ZZZZZZZZZ !
"Oh Angry Harry. I am
so happy that you chose me out of all the applicants to be your house
cleaner."
|
|
UK Surgeons
at a hospital where a consultant was handed a dessert spoon to help perform a
hip replacement operation consider it an acceptable instrument, a tribunal heard
yesterday.
Absolutely!
What can possibly be wrong with using spoons
from the canteen for conducting major surgery?
Taxpayers are not made of money!
The British NHS should not need to waste their
our valuable resources on purchasing so-called sophisticated surgical equipment
when Doris the Dishwasher can supply knives and forks and spoons for a fraction
of the cost.
What wimps we have today.
When AH was a lad, they'd whip you into
hospital, give you a glass of water as an anaesthetic and cut you open with a
breadknife no matter what your medical complaint.
Then they'd slash away at your entrails and
slit your gizzard with a potato peeler a full half-hour before wheeling you into the operating
theatre simply in order to save time and, hence, money. And then, when your
allotted ten minutes was over, they'd sew you back up like a haggis and you were
told that you were completely cured.
And very few patients ever returned for
further treatment!
Thus proving that the system worked extremely
well..
Ah yes. The good old days. When men were
strong, and when women were ... ... as ever.
|
|
Hello,
I would just like to thank you for your
fabulous site. I am a feminist and women's studies scholar who was having a
difficult time getting through the final few weeks of this program. Your site
not only motivated me, it made me laugh and made me realize just how amazing my
program is. I finished my thesis early and was able to push forward. I've
forwarded your url to many of my feminist friends and they have commented the
same way. They too were inspired to write and keep up with their causes. Well
done. You deserve the utmost congratulations. Without it, I would still be a
frustrated final year student.
Thank youuuuu! You inspire many feminists to
keep up their fights.
Lanie
Hi Lanie
Thank youuuuu!
I hope that you and all your feminist friends do well in all your exams.
Here's a hint as to how to get about 80% of the marks.
Somewhere on each page, manage to say that "all men are bastards -
particularly the white ones."
Somewhere on each page mention how evil are all dead white males.
Somewhere on each page make a statement about how badly women have been
oppressed in the past and how this is still the case.
In other words, be a victim!
Do this, and spell your name correctly, and you and your young friends will
surely pass all the exams with flying colours.
At your university, I'm sure that such mindless political correctness will end
up qualifying you even to do brain surgery.
They sky is the limit for you gals!
AH
Hello again
Gracious, You aren't an angry man are you?
Hehehe. Actually we're not allowed to call men names. The majority of the women
in my program are married with children or have boyfriends/lovers who are men.
We love men. We just think it's funny when you get so offensive over equality.
It's ok though, because you'll get used to it when it comes about. Your site is
still making me laugh. Have you read any third wave feminism? You seem to be
quoting the positivist second wave which ended many years ago... Try out some
new stuff, it's fabulous. It's also easier to read so you may be able to get
through it.
Good luck!
Lanie
Hello Lanie
You're back again.
Go away.
I do not have the time to study the prattlings
and witterings of 'third' wave feminists - though 'final' wave feminists would
now be a better description of them.
Nevertheless, it is good to hear that you are
not allowed to call men names.
But, despite your claims, I suspect that you
do not love men. You merely say that you do.
It's easily done.
But no-one who loves men would endorse courses
that actively promote male hatred. For the most part these courses appear to be
nothing more than ...
Vapid.
Vacuous.
Vulvaric.
Verbiage.
Venerating.
Victimhood.
But you're right about one thing. The 'third'
wave feminist material is much easier to read. And this is because it is very
***simple***!
With a few notable exceptions, it is rarely
more than a collection of trite and inane platitudes about the need for
'equality' repeated over and over again until one would rather die a slow and
horrible death than continue to bear the utterly intolerable boredom that it
engenders.
Had the vindictive dysfunctional 'wimmin' of
the 70s not managed to intimidate and so hijack the mainstream media - which
feminists and their associated victim groups continue to do - but not for much
longer - both men and women today would have been happier, healthier, wealthier
and wiser by far.
Further, the freedoms that you enjoy today
have come about mostly thanks to advances in science, medicine and technology
which arise mostly through the work of men - mostly white ones at that.
Not only did feminism have nothing to do with
the creation of these freedoms, it has done a great deal to prevent them from
actually flourishing further and more quickly.
And, in the not too distant future, my guess
is that most western women will rue the day that they ever supported in any way
such a destructive ideology.
Nevertheless, since you have exams coming up,
I feel dutybound to help you to do well.
And so here
is the poetic work (link now
defunct) of a weeping wailing woman that will surely help to inspire you to produce the
right tone for your forthcoming exams.
A weeping and wailing tone is all that you need.
Take a leaf out of her book - or, better
still, pinch some of her stuff - and see your career fly!
AH
|
|
AH
First off, lemme just say that I hate your
site. I think you're great, and you can without a doubt consider me a fan, but
seriously, what's up with your choice of color? My eyes were about three seconds
from actually bleeding.
Seriously though, I can't stress enough the
importance of the work your doing. In the articles and ideas you present in your
site, you show most vividly the inhumanity of our human society. This is the
kind of stuff that makes me want to set the world aflame, and sit on the
coastline of some far off island, sipping a fruit drink and laughing for a very
long time.
Insane rampage fantasies aside, Let me just
say I love your work. keep it coming, and fight the good fight, for there are
those among us who have been psychologically neutered by hate speech and false
accusations, and have given up hope. fight the power for those among us who
can't.
Preach on, brother, preach on.
Just PLEASE do someting about the color
scheme.
-J.
Dear J
I do not recall asking readers for their
opinions about my colour scheme. Nevertheless, since you have proffered yours out
of the blue, let me take this opportunity to advise you that each colour has
been meticulously selected from a sample of many in order to magnify any
reactions of shock or nausea that might be elicited by reading some of the
content herein and to toughen up activists for the battles that they must
undoubtedly face in the near future.
Further, this site is not intended for women,
for whom colour and decor alone represent everything that there is to know about
life and the universe.
Do you think that the great surgeons and
anatomists of the past opened up their cadavres and said, "Oh my goodness.
What a terrible colour. There is nothing of interest to be found in here."
Did Columbus sail his ship in the direction of
the prettiest cloud?
This site is for men who understand that the
contents of books cannot be judged accurately solely on the basis of their colours.
Further, the diabolical colours, the harsh
verbal atmosphere and, indeed, the semi-clad women that occasionally inhabit the
pages are all painstakingly coordinated to keep even the most curious of women
'out of the house', so to speak - though occasionally one manages to sneak
through in order to irritate me.
The whole thing functions like a kind of
visual mosquito net. It keeps out the women - and also the overly religious and
the over-sensitive.
This allows AH's activists to gather secretly
on this website in order to plot and to activate without alerting too many of the enemy.
And your eyes are bleeding because they are
not yet accustomed to looking too closely at the vile world that men must
nowadays inhabit. Their thoughts and their feelings must skulk around under the
cover of darkness and/or behind veils of repellent colours lest the
thought-police discover and harass them. And only those men who are willing
enough to join in the battles ahead can remain for long inside these murky
domains.
And, as for the rest of the world?
Well, what does it matter?
There. You see!
You set me off.
Yes, I know the colours are diabolical. But
there are many benefits to be had from this - only some of which have I alluded
to above!
Most important of all, however, is that it is
soooo nice to receive such a glowing email of support!
So, thank you kindly J, your comments are very
much appreciated - and they shall invigour me to fight on!
AH
|
From: "TD Hunt" <tdh105@york.ac.uk>
To: comments@angryharry.com
Subject: [none]
You are a deluded and sick man.
From: angryharryspost@yahoo.com
To: "TD Hunt" <tdh105@york.ac.uk>
Subject: [none]
Hmm.
Well, it's not the longest of emails is it?
Nevertheless, it tells me a great deal!
From the first part of your email address I
can confidently declare that you are someone of no great importance.
From the second part I can deduce that you
would claim to work at the University of York.
From your self-chosen title - TD Hunt - I
infer that you are something of a cold fish, unwilling to impart even your
Christian name to the world at large.
And from the message itself I can conclude
that you are a man, or, more accurately, a male.
Firstly, a woman would have had far more to say.
Secondly, she would have been far more expressive
with her words.
Thirdly, she would have written the two
adjectives 'deluded' and 'sick' the other way round, as those with any sense of
rhythm would appreciate.
I also conclude that you are a political
correctoid.
And I do so partly for these three reasons.
Firstly, you clearly feel it unnecessary to
justify your childish taunt and/or you simply do not have the wit to do so.
Secondly, your primary instinct is to insult
rather than to elucidate.
Thirdly, you seem completely oblivious to the
fact that, should I feel so inclined, it would not take very much effort for me
to find out who you are, and cause you a great deal of embarrassment - which is
not very clever of you.
But a typical characteristic of political
correctoids is that they seem remarkably unable to see where their actions might
inadvertently lead.
Indeed, the very presence of your name upon
this page will attract the attention of Google whenever, perchance, someone
should seek out information about you.
Which, admittedly, seems an unlikely event.
However, the late hour in which you posted
your email suggests to me that you have no girlfriend, boyfriend, wife or
partner to distract you from your surfing during the nighttime. This, together
with the lack of expression in your message coupled with the absence of your
Christian name in your title, gives me the distinct impression of a rather timid
and withdrawn character.
And so you have my sympathy.
Which is lucky for you.
Putting all this altogether, I conclude that
you are a male student in your second year wasting taxpayer's money floating
around the internet when you should be working hard for your exams.
And I would imagine that you are a 'scientist'
of some sort - but not one who knows very much about computers or the internet.
Perhaps you are a biologist of some
description.
Ah yes. A biologist with a 'feminist
perspective'.
Howzat!
Am I right?
AH
|
|
AH
i just got a new game for the computer called:
hairy harry! LOL here is the description for the game: In the Hairy Harry game
you control a little funny man called Harry. He was sent to prison by the unjust
law and has to escape to prove that he is not guilty... To escape the prison
Harry must pass through all its levels. At the end of each level there is a
steel door. To open this door Harry must collect the keys to all its locks. The
number of keys that are left you can see in the information panel at the bottom
of the screen. In addition to the steel doors there are also secret stairs that
will lead to freedom as soon as Harry collects all the keys. The prison guards
and specially trained rats will pursuit Harry on his way to freedom trying to
prevent him from escaping the jail.
W
Hi W
Sounds like a good game. Committed activists
should play it often in order to be prepared for every possible scenario! One
never knows when one might end up locked behind bars in rat-infested cells with
steel doors.
It
could be a life saver!
I've recently been practising the art of
political battle with Soul Blade. And I can now almost decapitate that whining
feminist Sophitia by using that gigantic axe wielded by the mighty Rock.
That woman gets on my nerves!
Every time that she wins a battle against you
she says in a particularly pathetic 6 year-old voice, "I'm sorry."
But that bitch isn't sorry at all!
Last night I managed to whack her around the
head a few times with the axe, but, thus far, no blood.
Never mind. When the 'Final Battle' begins in
earnest here in the UK, and the men's activists bear down upon the feminist
monsters - probably in Trafalgar Square - AH will wave around his axe with the
utmost dexterity and panache, and he will lop off their ugly heads.
But, for now, keep practising.
It is imperative for the Men's Movement that
you learn how to get Hairy Harry out of that jail!
AH
|
| |
The so-called 'oppression' of
women ...




click a picture
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is.
And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's
health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to
women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being
designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in
social service care-homes as
boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their
children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide,
20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the
mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far
less in benefits from the government.
In other words, when compared to women, men are
significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their
children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit
system, and even when it comes to their
own personal
safety.
They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work
place.
How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
|