|
Angry Harry
Blog
Guide To Feminist Nonsense
Recent comments from some emails which can be
viewed in full here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I
read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are
indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have
changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for
hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly
wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I
regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your
website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making
your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!"
(from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours
of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular
basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone
mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98%
of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while
now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing
the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of
youngsters to your site."
|
Bits and Bobs 2
 Austria Austrian
police have staged a series of raids on bakeries across the country acting on
information that their doughnuts do not contain enough jam. link now defunct
And quite right too!
It is absolutely outrageous that the good folk
of Austria should arrive home after a hard day's shopping only to find when
they have poured the tea and settled themselves in front of the TV that their
doughnuts are acutely and heinously jam deficient.
What is the world coming to?
The European Union in its infinite and
incontestable wisdom has made it abundantly clear that
jam doughnuts must contain at least 15% of jam, and that there should be a
perfectly reasonable three-year prison sentence in store for those who have the
audacity to think otherwise, or who have the nerve to suggest that doughnuts
should not really need to be defined by a percentagewise determination of their
constituents.
Which, of course, they must.
In the UK, however, in a clear demonstration
of just how feeble and lacking are politicians when it comes to the defence of
those liberties considered most precious by citizens, the government seems to
have willfully defied this most reasonable and scientific of nutritional dictats.
No Sirree. Jam doughnuts in the UK do not need
to have any jam in them at all!
The only requirement appears to be that there
must be a whopping great hole in the centre of the dough with sufficient volume
to accommodate a tennis ball.
And should, perchance, some paltry and highly suspect and
circumstantial filling of any sort be discovered therein by one's roving and
unsuspecting tongue, it is nowadays considered best to regard the entire episode
as a particularly fortuitous occasion worthy of some celebration. And perhaps
later it is wise also to send a grovelling letter of undying gratitude to the manufacturers
lest they never allow it to happen again.
|
|
Fifty
years to the day from the discovery of the structure of DNA, one of its
co-discoverers has caused a storm by suggesting that stupidity is a genetic
disease that should be cured.
A fabulous idea.
No more stupid people; i.e. no more political correctoids or women
gullible enough to support those hateful feminists would ever again be born!
Also ... "Watson, no stranger to
controversy, also suggests that genes influencing beauty could also be
engineered. "People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I
think it would be great."
Another fabulous idea!
Women should be granted an inalienable right
not to be ugly.
And the UN should pass an urgent resolution to
this effect forthwith.
Yo!
Now, talking of ugly women, let AH let his
younger readers into a little secret.
Bar the extremes of ugliness, which is
actually pretty rare these days, the desirability of womenfolk when based upon
their prettiness is akin to that of little children comparing the taste of sweet
and fruity juices to that of beer or whisky.
Figure out that one if you can!
|
|
Male
Pill on the Horizon: Drug disables mouse sperm but wears off quickly
The success of this pill would be a
significant step forward in the liberation of men who, currently, for complete
safety from unwanted pregnancies, have to rely - foolishly - on the competence,
the honesty and the integrity of the females with whom they are conjugating -
qualities which are clearly so lacking in many females these days that unwanted
pregnancies in the UK exceed those of any other European nation.
Too often have men been defrauded of their
futures because they have been hoodwinked into trusting their female partners.
And remember that there are some 180,000
abortions per year in the UK. These, too, are 'unwanted pregnancies'.
I recently saw a report showing that one of
the main reasons that young teenage women became pregnant even though they were
taking the contraceptive pill was because they did not understand the
instructions!
For example, some of these hapless females
thought that they only needed to take the pill ONCE in order for it to be
effective for the next 24 hours. Others had actually inserted the damn things
into their vaginas believing that this is how the pill is supposed to be
administered.
And, as we know, many others, preferring free
accommodation, 'liberation' from their parents, and welfare cheques - as well as
money from the luckless semen donors - to a forty-hour week working in
Woolworths, manage to get themselves pregnant by deception.
Indeed, a male contraceptive pill could have
saved Boris Becker £3 million - a sum which he paid to the woman who had sex
with him just ONCE inside a dank but roomy broom cupboard!
But, of course, he shouldn't have had to pay a
penny! (e.g. Why
Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to have a Baby?)
Whatever the circumstances that prevail
whereby men are essentially deceived into creating babies, an effective male
contraceptive pill would afford them a great deal of protection, and it would
give them far more control over their own reproductive capacities.
And it is about time that this happened!
And, of course, not only is it in the area of
unwanted pregnancies and abortions that such a pill would save many men from the
failures of some womenfolk. There is also the huge question of paternity fraud,
in which large numbers of men - currently estimated at about 10% - are
bamboozled into believing that they have fathered children when they have not.
And a male contraceptive pill would clearly
protect many men from such a circumstance because any pregnancy while using it
would be highly suspicious and decidedly worthy of further investigation.
|
|
UK Born
to a poor family in America's racially torn deep south, Oprah Winfrey has fought
prejudice all her life, battling her way to media stardom as the most powerful
black television presenter in her country's history.
The article then goes on to describe her
roaring success without once giving any evidence for all the prejudice that she
allegedly had to fight against.
Indeed, by the time she was 23, she already
had her own TV show! - i.e. she couldn't have had to fight any prejudice for
very long.
Compared to most black men this queen of bullsh*t probably doesn't even know the meaning of the word prejudice.
|
|
Aus An
Australian MP was given a rude introduction to arcane political conventions
yesterday when she was ejected from the chamber of the Victorian state
parliament while breastfeeding her baby.
And quite right too!
How can politicians possibly discuss serious
national issues if their voices are being crowded out by the ghastly racket
being generated by Ms Marshall's most recent of uterine evacuations as it sucks
and slurps furiously at her plump moist teats?
Was this inconsiderate woman also expecting to
remove her neonate's sticky and malodorous nappies while her highly
distinguished parliamentary colleagues struggled to engage in both instructive
and forceful debate?
Is there anything else that this woman would
require of her country?
Are there no ends to the demands of western
womenfolk?
|
|
Hi Jack
Let me point out just three things.
1. About 20 years ago, for some reason which I
cannot quite remember, I read some in-depth research about the effects of an
advertising campaign promoting Pan Yan Pickle - a sandwich spread. The advert
was being displayed in different months in various TV regions in different parts
of the UK, and the resulting change in sales in those regions was being very
closely scrutinised by the manufacturing company - Rowntrees, I think.
Anyway.
Most of the advert consisted basically of a
middle-aged man sitting peacefully by the river eating his sandwiches and
watching his fishing line - with a monologue to do with how nice and peaceful
fishing was.
Only toward the very end of the
advert was some association made with Pan Yan Pickle i.e. the product was hardly
mentioned at all throughout the advert.
The findings were that product sales more than
doubled in those regions where the advert was shown - which, to the company,
represented MILLIONS of pounds.
I was astonished. Not only because the product
was hardly mentioned in the advert, but because it also didn't have anything
directly to do with fishing!
And my point is this.
The 'plots' of adverts are almost
inconsequential. Provided that they produce a good feeling, they can succeed
wonderfully well.
And so the male-bashing found in so many
adverts these days often arises simply because the advertisers want to connect their
product with a storyline - any storyline - that has a 'good feeling' to it.
Humour often produces a good feeling. But, in
today's climate, while humour is permitted at the expense of men, it is not
permitted at the expense of women.
This a major problem for the advertisers.
2. My guess is that, for the most part,
advertisers are not particularly setting out to bash males, but they have
to come up with something! However, they wouldn't dare
poke fun at women, because the feminists would be after them - which means,
basically, that they can only poke fun at men.
AH
|
|
Ten year sentence - for yapping at
an American woman
|
|
What's the difference between AH's pay cheque and a
large pizza?
A large pizza feeds a family of four!
|
|
|
|

ZZZZZZZZZ !
"Ooo Ungry
Hurry. It eez so goot ist bing yo hosse clooner. Ant mie Engleesh ist
improveng. Yest? I well pooter dis mopper ant bukketer ere, ant fo yo makjer ay nicer
cup off the tee. Yest?"
|
|
UK A
flagship government scheme to help poorly performing 11- and 12-year-olds has
failed to achieve significant improvements in their grades, new test results
show.
Well, what a surprise!
As I keep saying, unless they change the
teaching methods, these amazingly incompetent politically-corrected
educationalists will achieve very little.
Having said this, the bottom 5% of 'normal'
children (i.e. those without recognised specific learning disabilities such as
'dyslexia') have amazing difficulties when it comes to their ability to deal
with symbolic information - letters, numbers, words, formulae etc.
And these 'normal' children are mostly not
very bright in other ways too!
However, many teachers have been trained over
the years to believe that children do not vary in terms of their
cognitive abilities - a clear demonstration of how almost unbelievable is the
stupidity and/or deceitfulness of many educationalists in the universities -
but, the truth of the matter is that children differ enormously in
terms of their abilities.
Their differences emulate those between a
Pentium III and a 486!
And some of them, of course, are actually
brain damaged in some way, despite the fact that this might not be very obvious -
particularly to those professionals who believe that differences between
children are merely caused by their environmental circumstances.
And now here is one of my anecdotes!
Some 12 years ago I came across a woman
teacher with some 8 years of professional experience who was explaining why the
following clue in a junior crossword for 7 year-olds was sexist and should not
be allowed.
"A girl may wear this to a party. dr..."
The reason was, she argued, that the question
implied that only a girl would wear a dress and, further, that it would
encourage girls to wear dresses.
It was eye-rolling stuff!
Anyway.
It also transpired that her firm belief was
that the only reason that children differed in terms of their
academic performance was related to their economic circumstance, and that the
concept of intelligence was nothing more than hot air.
And no amount of argument would change her
mind on this.
But an opportunity arose to relieve her of
this ridiculous notion.
It happened by chance that two boys, aged 10,
arrived in her classroom having been transferred from other schools.
Boy D was transferred for being too Disruptive
and aggressive in his last school - a normal primary state school.
Boy P had been in a Private school with a
significant reputation but he was just unable to cope academically and so he was
withdrawn.
Needless to say, Boy D's academic performance
was not as good as was Boy P's, by a long way!
And here is the interesting thing. Both
boys had been investigated by Educational Psychologists to understand the
reasons for their 'failures', and as part of their investigations, the IQs of
the boys had been assessed.
Now, these IQ tests suggested that Boy D, the
Disruptive boy, was, in fact, much brighter, by a long way, than Boy P, the one
who had been to a good Private school..
And our feminist teacher was made fully aware
of this when she looked at the reports on them. The IQ results, she dismissed
completely.
And, of course, the 'proof' of her position
was in front of her!
After all, Boy D was economically poor -
living on a council estate. He was of mixed race and lived in a single-mother
household. And his academic standard was low.
Conversely, Boy P, whose parents were
well-off, middle class, white, and willing to spend a fortune on their son's
education, was far more advanced than Boy D.
Case proved!
Until, that was, our feminist friend actually
had to teach the pair of them.
Well, to cut a long story short, Boy D was
very soon sitting near the top of the class with hardly any effort, while Boy P
had barely progressed at all. In fact, according to our feminist friend, he
seemed to have gone backward - which was probably the case.
And so the IQ scores meant something!
However! To give this feminist woman her due,
the evidence before her completely changed her attitude toward IQ tests and
toward claims about the nature of intelligence, and she began to see - and
admit - that she had once been taught, and believed, a lot of
politically-correct nonsense.
She had seen the light!
But Angry Harry! Did she change her views
about the dress question in the crossword?
Did she? Did she? Did she?
Well, the truth is that I don't know.
But, probably not!
|
|
USA State
police in New Jersey say a man who lost custody of his children tried to have
his divorce attorney killed.
But he failed in his attempt!
Still. No matter how much you hate your lawyer
- or, even more likely, her lawyer - murder will achieve nothing.
It will do the exact opposite of what you really desire.
If on occasion you feel like murdering a
lawyer or two - and don't we all!? - then do it with words on the internet.
Kill the lawyers with your grammar, your
punctuation, your vocabulary and your stocks of verbal weaponry!
|
|
"Hurry up Woman! It's
freezing out here."
|
|
USA Can
dogs be racist? - yawn
But the very notion reminds me of an
off-the-cuff remark that I once made many years ago and which did not go down
too well with those who heard it.
Whilst having afternoon tea with a few others
in the sunny garden of a friend whose daughter was celebrating something or
other - her first experience of domestic violence probably - a rather large dog
with big teeth in the adjacent garden - safely ensconced behind a wooden fence -
perchance started to bark and snarl at me rather viciously for no apparent
reason.
The hostess smiled at me sympathetically. "She
doesn't like men," she said, offering me a sandwich.
"A feminist bitch then!?" I
retorted most cleverly - expecting rapturous applause from all those around me.
(female dog, bitch, get it?)
But nobody even even smiled.
And so shortly thereafter I skulked off to
the living room and spent the remainder of the afternoon in the company of a
pair of old grandmothers who kept busily dipping biscuits in their tea and
talking about their families while the laughter from a TV game show playing out
in the background oftentimes attracted their attention.
But there was a ray of light that cheered him
up.
After about half an hour, one of the old dears
suddenly looked away from the TV and peered over at me with added scrutiny.
"Are you the one who dislikes
feminists?" she asked sternly - out of the blue.
"Er. Yes. Sort of," I replied,
completely thrown off guard.
"Good for you," she said, nodding
approvingly while turning back toward the TV. "I don't like them
either."
And, fortunately or otherwise, the
conversation never went any further.
But it was enough!
|
|
The Future is Female
Yeah, right.
|
|
|
|
Brazil A
Brazilian who says he was cheated on by eight wives has established a society
for men who are unlucky in love.
Eight wives! And every one of them turns out
to be a harlot and a hustler!?
This just goes to show what scurrilous
schemers and cunning connivers are these Brazilian womenfolk.
The proof is now in.
Women the world over are nowadays nothing more
than heartless hussies and heinous hos!
|
|
UK A
written constitution, a single tax rate, the voting age reduced to 16, and all
legislation to be approved by electronic referendum are the driving principles
of the new People's Alliance party that is wooing disaffected Tories.
Hmm. Sounds good!
But, reducing the voting age to 16? Hmm. I
don't think so.
At the age of 16 people are far too young to
understand the ins and outs of life. They're butt-full of emotions and crazy
ideals.
And the politicians will end up pandering to
them!
Free food for everybody! Yeeeesssss!
No more schools! Yeeeesssss!
No tax on alcohol. Free transport. Join
Europe. Join the world. No borders. No immigration rules!
Yeeeesssss!
Giving 16 year olds the vote is a ridiculous
idea.
They will have the effect of pushing us in
the wrong directions.
They should be listened to, of course.
But only people over 25 should have the vote.
And people over 50 should get two votes!
And people over 75 should get three votes!
And people over 100 should get four votes!
V = int(a/25)
The power of Maths!
In my most expert opinion, the votes should be weighted
in the direction of greater experience and general wisdom.
But Angry Harry, there are four times as many
women as men over the age of 75. The male vote would be completely swamped!
Hmm.
And therein lies the flaw.
But there are many solutions that come to
mind!
A good solution to such a diabolical and
heinous form of sex-discrimination against men would be to take back the vote
from women altogether.
After all, what have they done with it, except
to create the most unwholesome mess?
Anyway. What was the point of giving women the
vote?
Whom did it benefit?
Not me!
That's for sure!
Men should just take it back and say,
"OK. OK. You've had your fun now. You've had a fair chance to prove that
you are worthy of such a privilege. But you failed the test. It's time to get
your arse back into the kitchen to make the tea."
You see. Women will never do anything
worthwhile with the vote.
It's like giving a typewriter to a female
chimpanzee and expecting her to write like Shakespeare.
It's like giving candy to a five year old girl
and saying, "Share it with your friends."
It's like giving an adolescent female a mirror
and telling her not to spend all day looking at it.
Giving the vote to women was the cultural
equivalent of giving the population the Black Plague.
It has caused no end of hardship and misery.
And a good solution is for men to take it
back!
That would put an end to all this
sex-discrimination!
|
|
UK Increasing
numbers of women are seeking surgery on the NHS to enlarge their breasts and are
being given permission to have the operations, it emerged yesterday.
Ah yes. Here in the UK, where we spend eight
times more on women's health issues than on men's, and where people even
with cancer have to wait some considerable time before they are seen or treated,
and in a country which has one of the poorest results in Europe when it comes to
cancer treatment, we manage to find the money to pay for women to enlarge their
breasts despite the fact that the health service workers are constantly
complaining that they are short of resources.
In one English county demand has risen to
such an extent that psychologists are now asked to vet the women with small
breasts and decide who will benefit from breast enlargement surgery.
Sounds like a job for me!
"Hmm. Let's have a look at these liitle things.
Get them out. Hmm. Not bad. Turn to the side a little. Hmm. A little on the flat
side. They feel quite firm though. And they rub quite well. Hmm. Put your hands
on your head. Hmm. Jiggle them up and down a bit. Hmm. No, I don't think so.
Come back and see me next week and I'll see how they are progressing. That'll be
fifty pounds."
There are real fortunes being made in this
ever-growing breast industry.
And I would like a piece of the action!
|
|
The future is female.
|
|
AH always does his morning
exercise
before breakfast.
|
|
"I USED to feel like a phony if I was out there with colored nails
and a lot of makeup ... but now I see that you can go a long way on that stuff
- the nails, the breasts, the high heels, the walk, the deep voice. Men don't
realize how manipulated they can be. They are really sitting ducks a lot of the
time." Meg Ryan - the actress
|
|

ZZZZZZZZZ !
"Oh Angry
Harry. Are you really, really, really sure that if I cut my hair and dye it blonde you
will still find me desirable?"
"Yep."
|
|
UK She
was beaten by her parents, struggled with drugs, eating disorders and a string
of abusive boyfriends. Next came a nervous breakdown, the death of her first
husband and finally her own attempted suicide. But who's the common
denominator eh? - Lynn Barber writing about Trisha Goddard - yes, the
"Trisha" - Britain's answer to Oprah.
Trisha, the one whose TV chat programme has,
in my view, probably done more to damage UK men than any other e.g. see AH's Why
Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to have a Baby?
How many times have I told my magnificent readers that the
women who continually fuel the hate-stirring propaganda against men are, well,
let's just say, not normal?
Hundreds of times.
And from this article it would appear that
"Trisha" fits the bill rather well.
Who's the common denominator when it comes to
all the disharmony and 'abuse', eh?
She is.
|
|
USA By
the time they reached their 80s and 90s, only 2 percent of women reported recent
sexual activity.
Only 2%?
What do they mean by 'only' 2%?
How
on earth are women in their 80s and 90s managing to have any sex at all?
And what kind of sex are they actually having
without breaking anything? This is what I would like to know.
And where are the luckless men who are
undoubtedly being ruthlessly and rudely forced into giving these feeble old
skinbags some sex actually coming from?
Ah yes. Perhaps from the planet Krypton.
Yes, that must be it!
When the lights are out and Doris has finally
set her teeth fizzing away in the glass, through the doorway appears a handsome
rugged-jaw hunk with the pectorals of a polar bear dressed in leotards.
What other explanation is there?
Human men are mostly dead and gone by then,
surely?
And the few remaining men who do survive to
such an old age can barely walk and talk, never mind hump and pump.
Men who manage to survive into their 80s and
90s have heart disease, brittle bones, arthritis and mental problems. How can
they possibly be having sex?
It simply cannot be.
Is it really possible that the tiny number of
men who have actually managed to remain breathing at this age are actually doing
all the rounds sexually fulfilling the 2%? You know - perhaps sneaking themselves
into all the rooms at the nursing homes.
And how do we know that this 2% of ancient
women were actually telling the truth in this telephone survey?
Maybe they were lying or misunderstood the
questions.
"Have you had any recently?"
"Whaaat?"
"Have you had any recently?"
""Whaaat?"
"Sex!?"
"Yes."
"You've had sex!?"
"Whaaat?"
"Sex!?"
"Did you say, Sex?"
"Yes. I said Sex!"
"Whaaat?"
Well, you see the point!
Nevertheless, some of these old codgers
clearly never give up trying! ...

|
|
|
|
USA Male
prisoners can be abused, but aren't vulnerable in the way women are. Women get
raped, a crime that any civilized society considers particularly horrific.
Rich Lowry - making some good points, and some bad ones!
The notion that rape is worse than many other
things that happen to prisoners of war is politically correct feminist bullsh*t.
Even the feminist Germaine Greer has claimed that she would rather be raped
(which she claims she already has been) than have her little finger chopped off
or be beaten up.
Indeed, a TV advertisement for British Telecom
currently doing the rounds throughout the UK suggests that rape is actually
something to have a good laugh about - the rape of a male, that is.
|
|
"Well, I would have reported it sooner Sergeant, but I didn't know
I'd been raped until the cheque bounced."
|
|
|
|
|
The so-called oppression of women ...




Click a picture
|
|