After all, what sane judge would grant care of children to men who behave in this fashion?

... But the only people who have been exposed as 'morons' in this episode are all the MPs sitting in the House of Commons. These half-wits cannot even protect the government chamber, and yet they think that they can protect the entire country from Al-Quaeda!

What.

A.

Joke!

And what did about two dozen of these selfish frauds do when the powder was thrown? They scrabbled around like flustered turkeys and hurtled themselves out into the open air!!!!! - despite the fact that in doing so they could have contaminated the whole of London with bio-spores of one form or another.

And they had been warned about this!

According to a Newsnight reporter they were outside the building before you could say, "News 24".

This man is a hero! ... 

Ron Davis

... and so is this one ...

Guy Harrison

...They have exposed the shameful incompetence of MPs in their dealing with vital national security matters.

They have demonstrated how little do MPs actually care about infecting the rest of the population in an attempt to save their own skins - and how cowardly was the behaviour of many of them.

Their actions will eventually lead to procedures that will help to prevent future attacks from taking place successfully in the House of Commons - thus saving the lives of MPs in the future as well as the consequences that would be faced by the country.

They have highlighted the plight of fathers.

Their actions have received world-wide coverage throughout the past few days.

As such, they have probably already done more to protect this nation than have all those addle-headed nincompoops who were sitting in the House.

And look at this ...

+ Despite the MPs' rapid exodus, ushers forced 200 people in the public gallery to stay put. They endured a 40-minute ordeal while forensic tests were carried out on the powder - many worried they might have been infected with a lethal substance. "The powder had 40 minutes to affect us yet all the MPs were allowed to scarper." 

... The members of the public who were sitting in the gallery - including the children - were forced to stay in the presence of the powder while the MPs fled the place, possibly infecting others.

Indeed, Ben Judge in The Scotsman had this to say ...

It showed how MPs really do think they are a species apart from the common (hu)man: had any other room full of people been exposed to suspicous powders in these sensitive times, they would have been locked up - at gunpoint if necessary - until the public health authorities decided they were not about to spread smallpox to the rest of us. But not MPs. No, they're allowed straight out into the fresh air to disperse potentially lethal biological warfare agents right bang slap in the middle of a city with a population density of 22,000 people per square mile. There's selfish for ya.

Finally, Peter Hain, The Leader of the House of Commons, admitted on the BBC's Today Programme that this incident would lead to many important lessons being learned.

He admitted this.

So, please answer for me this question.

Having achieved such a great deal of good, do these hapless politicians intend now to prosecute Ron Davis and Guy Harrison even though there is a strong likelihood that these two men have actually saved some of their miserable lives from some future attack?

(Yes. They did prosecute them.)

Goodness. We are at war with Al-Quaeda and their supporters - a group that has successfully caused murder and mayhem throughout the world - even pulling off the most phenomenally successful attacks of 9/11 - and it turns out that this useless bunch of parliamentarians who claim to be competent enough to protect us still cannot even protect the most important room in the country!

...

On the various men's lists and in the press there also seem to be some misgivings about the flour-throwing antics of F4J by a few people who would be regarded as men's rights 'leaders'.

Amazing.

These particular men have achieved precious little in the specific area of fathers' rights in recent times. And perhaps they should try to understand why this might be the case.

The blacks, the gays and the feminists only achieved their enviable privileged status by creating the most enormous fuss, causing mayhem, being aggressive and, in many cases, threatening violence. 

And these tactics still work today as politicians of all colours sneak around trying to 'protect' the privileged groups in various ways by banning everyone else from saying or doing anything that might offend them or provoke them - e.g. as the following article demonstrates ...

Offensive Programme? A Channel 4 documentary that claims Asian men in Bradford have been "grooming" young white girls for sex was withdrawn hours before it was due to be broadcast last night after the police warned it could spark racial violence. 

...

And if various men's leaders cannot see the evidence - that stretches back at least for decades - showing that the only way to get the government to do anything on their behalf is to raise merry Hell, then they will surely soon have their eyes opened.

Basically, the deal is this.

White heterosexual males have to shut up or face being prosecuted while every other group is armed to the teeth with laws that not only protect and promote their special interests but which also act as weapons to be used against white heterosexual males with impunity.

This is what so-called 'democracy' is about these days.

Men's 'leaders' can talk to politicians politely year after year after year but the reality is that all their conversations will be wiped away into obscurity by just one shriek from the feminists - which will send every politician running for cover and begging for their forgiveness.

...

Just one example, ...

Women Never Responsible For DV Nunavut's premier has stripped the territory's justice minister of his duties over a remark that suggests women are partly to blame when they are assaulted during domestic disputes.

Eva Aariak said she has taken over the department from Louis Tapardjuk, who made the comment last week in an email.

"Often, in cases of domestic disputes, both parties share the blame but, according to the Criminal Code, the person who gets physical is charged, even though the other party initiated the conflict," Tapardjuk wrote.

"Often, the male is charged even though the conflict may have been initiated by the female partner."

So he was sacked and made to apologise.

Tapardjuk also suggested that the slow pace of the criminal justice system is responsible for many young people committing suicide when they face charges. He also said the involvement of social services and police in marital problems contributes to a growing number of divorces.

Who cares about young people - i.e. young men mostly - committing suicide when the feminist agenda must be supported at all costs, eh?

...

And as for those who have suggested that F4J's actions are actually making matters worse for fathers, this is baloney - as the mere existence of the following article demonstrates ...

QC Supports Fathers Courts should take children away from mothers who flout contact orders by refusing to let them see their father, a family lawyer said yesterday. Philip Moor, QC, suggested that a few high-profile rulings in appropriate cases would send a message to other mothers. 

... Furthermore, the issues concerning fathers have been publicised all over the world thanks to Ron Davis and Guy Harrington.

It is absolutely preposterous to suggest that they have harmed the cause for fathers,

Besides which, it is about time that politicians were treated as our servants and not our masters. After all, this what they claim to be and what they are supposed to be.

Democracy is not about having politicians or governments telling you what to do. It is about them serving us.

Men's leaders should not humbly be asking politicians to consider more fully their rights, they should be telling them in no uncertain terms that unless politicians change their tune very considerably they will cause them an ever-increasing amount of trouble.

This is the only way in which they will achieve their aims.

Basically speaking, he who either threatens or nourishes the 'organism of power' ends up calling the shots.

And the thing is this.

When it comes to 'men' there is no part within the 'organism of power' that can currently be 'nourished' by 'men' without there also being a very expensive price that 'men' would end up paying in the longer term.

And this is because all governments get their powers by taking them away from men in some way or another.

Where else do you think that a government gets its powers from?

The 'organism of power' that is 'government'  is forever taking more and more from men in order to nourish itself.

It takes away their children - e.g. school.

It takes away their families - e.g. by forcing people to work longer hours to pay for their taxes.

It takes away their security - e.g. the right to defend oneself properly.

It takes away their jobs - e.g. through taxation.

It takes away their money - e.g. through taxation.

It takes away their time - e.g. through taxation.

It takes away more and more of their civil liberties.

And it even takes away more and more of their rights to govern their own countries and their own States.

And, almost unbelievably, the cretins in Parliament who cannot even protect the House Of Commons have made such a mess of things in Iraq that the UK is now very likely to be the target of terrorist attacks; from which there will arise even more dictating to, and even more damaging consequences.

How can 'men' possibly continue to support these people?

They are failing 'men' in almost every possible way.

Indeed, as a heterosexual 'man', what has your government done for you over the past 30 years, eh?

Virtually nothing.

And, indeed, whatever little that it has done for you, it has been doing far, far better for everyone else.

At, mostly, your expense!

It has taxed you more. It has imposed more regulations upon you. It has criminalised much more of your normal behaviour. It has demonised you. It has made you subject to gross prejudices in very many seriously important areas of the law. It has undermined all your relationships. And it seems determined forever to suck up more powers unto itself in order to control you even more.

And this is why 'men' have to threaten the organism of power rather than attempt to nourish it in order to extract some appropriate response from it.

The more that 'men' nourish it, the more does it take from them.

Anyway. Here is the Telegraph being insulting and failing completely to address any issue of importance ...

F4J Not Intelligent Fathers 4 Justice and their allies, such as the Spiderman protester who cost the taxpayer £50 million last year, do not deserve a place in history alongside the suffragettes. Apart from anything else, they do not seem very bright:

Look at this decoy tactic ...

On the other hand, only in about one in 100 cases do the courts bar fathers from any access to their children, and then usually for sensible reasons, such as a history of violence.

There is no mention of the fact that some 40% of all separated mothers admit that they thwarted access to the children in one way or another. And there is no mention of the huge number of false or exaggerated allegations of abuse that take place every year - nor, of course, of the even greater number of threats by women to do such things.

Ho Hum.

Never mind.

The time wherein men's activists have to say, "Please Sir. Can we change the law Sir?" are rapidly coming to an end. Indeed, one day, a chemist deranged with anger over the loss of his children might well kill a whole fistful of MPs with a powder of some sort.

It would clearly not be a very difficult thing to do.

That would bring about change!

In the end, of course, governments will lose their war against the Men's Movement.

It is only a matter of time.

But, incredibly, the politicians themselves have yet to see the way in which matters of security and 'power' are really heading. They are making one blunder after another - always underestimating the enemy and seemingly unaware of the power that they are losing by the day.

They think that they can swan around with impunity as they did before. They think that they can continue to alienate millions of men from society and treat them as if they were worthless, and that there will be no consequences!

It is quite astonishing just how blind they seem to be.

Climate Of Fear  Mothers for justice: women say militant fathers are creating a climate of fear. Maxine Frith - link now defunct

Do you know how many times various wimmin's groups have successfully blocked all forms of public discussion about the poor way in which men are being treated by using the professional victim's tactic of saying that it will 'create a climate of fear' among women?

Two hundred zillion times at least.

For example, for as long as I can remember, feminists and women's groups have used this 'climate of fear' tactic to prevent men's rights speakers from appearing on TV programmes. They have used it as a tactic to prejudice the laws against men and to hide accusing women from public view. 

And they have used it in a zillion other ways.

Apparently, men must not protest nor even be allowed to air their complaints politely because they will bring about a 'climate of fear'.

Well. What about the 'climate of fear' among men, eh?

For example, the fear of losing their homes and their children, eh?

Their fear of being falsely accused, eh?

As such, if some women are, indeed, experiencing a 'climate of fear' because of the antics of Fathers 4 Justice, GOOD!

Apart from serving them right for having colluded in inflicting huge legal injustices upon men for the past three decades, it will forewarn them of what is likely to be heading their way in the not too distant future.