03/10/03

From: "Rob Denk" <VirginiaU@dcemail.com>

To: harry@angryharry.com

Sir:

If their ever has been a more detestable loser amongst a once genuine mens cause, I have not seen him. You are the Gloria Steinem of this once great cause, bar none. No, you are far far worse. You make that hag look golden. Please go away and let us sane men keep mens virtues intact. You sir, are sickening. You can't be for real. You cannot. I've worked to keep my daughters away from monsters like you. Thankfully, my oldest has married a real man.

R. Denk, Retired USAF

Sir

You say nothing of interest to me.

You simply hurl one insult after another.

Seven, in total, I think.

Apart from that, nothing.

Zero. Zilch. Nought!

Insult. Insult. Insult. Insult. Insult. Insult. Insult.

Seven.

That makes you feel like a man, does it?

To me, you sound more like an arrogant spoilt bully boy in the playground trying to throw his weight around.

No brains. Just weight..

Tell me. What makes you think that you are so superior to me?

No. Don't tell me. You were once in the USAF.

Big deal!

What did you do? Clean out the cockpits? Polish the pilots' shoes? 

And did you verbally abuse your 'inferiors' with similar insults?

And now you puff up your chest and think that your insults should carry some added weight because you once did something with planes?

Well, take it from me, they don't carry any weight with me.

If you don't have the wit or the intelligence to say something of value, then you are not much of anything, in my view - except, of course, a rather unpleasant waste of my time and of my informational space.

Bye Bye.

AH

Dear Mr. Gloria Steinem,

Geez. Just like your website, Mr. Insecure. One queer-induced insult after another.

What makes you feel like a man is belitting all women we are endowed with on the face of God's planet, with your squalid rantings and disgustingly lowbrow, anti-woman, anti-person website. You are one ugly human being. Several honorable others who read the otherwise decent & hardworking MensNews daily proprietary site relayed to me that you were British. That explains alot. Now the picture is coming together. Your writings come off as if you've had one sh*tty life. Tell me, what are your personal issues in life? Are you a raging faggot queer?

Nothing else explains such putrid ranting. Nothing. Please don't associate yourself with us real men who respect all of God's creatures and fight the real enemy, which is real and avowed left feminists. Good men are sickened by you and yours.

R. Denk Retired USAF

LOL! 

It's at times like these that I have sympathy for even the most radical of feminists' views about the awfulness of men.

It's probably men like him who drove many women into becoming feminists in the first place.

And the really worrying part is that he also deludes himself into thinking that he is a man of God, who "respects all of God's creatures"!

What. A. Joke.

Thank goodness that his horrible kind are gradually going the way of the dinosaurs - where they belong!

Give me Gloria Steinem any day compared to this man.

(And I use the word 'man' in its loosest of senses!)

But the reason that I posted this particular piece was to highlight why, in my view, men-who-sit-at-screens need to be at the forefront of the men's movement, and why they will be at the forefront of it.

Men like the above will achieve very little in the way of influence via a screen. Their only real hope of influencing people is through physical intimidation.

In the past, such men had much power.

In the future, with any luck, they won't!

Though I rarely mention it (since just about all men, as 'men', are saints and angels on this website) the men's movement does have to deal with the fact that there are some very nasty men out there. 

They're violent, aggressive, rude, disruptive, uncaring, and a considerable burden upon society. This is partly to do with upbringing, and partly to do with genes.

But, wherever it comes from, we need to try to reduce the negative impact that these men have.

And they are not all criminals!

They could be police officers, lawyers, doctors, retired air force janitors, whoever. Men, even professional non-criminal men, are not always nice! The point is that the more that power shifts towards those men-who-sit-at-screens and, hence, away from those whose methods of 'influence' lie elsewhere, the better.

And one reason for this is that extreme views  - including any of my own! - are not very likely to gain much in the way of ascendance when they exist in 'open' informational space.

They will be very quickly undermined.

After all, extreme views are, by definition, rare. And in 'open' informational spaces they will quickly be attacked, submerged and neutralised by the more massive forces that would be rallied against them.

Which, I suppose, is another way of saying that the more that people can talk to each other, the better!