On page 25 of the May 4, 1992 Newsweek we can see a photo of women carrying placards which state, "Our Bodies Our Business". And on page 41 of the same issue we can see a lineup of delinquent dads arrested for non-payment of child support.
Needless to say, however, governments and police forces across the
western world will continue to lie about the levels of drink spiking and
they will continue to generate hysteria and man-hatred over the matter.
Ambush Makeovers -
if you keep clicking the NEXT button on the page, you will get some idea
of where we are finally taking our womenfolk.
Have a good browse and discover some exciting new ways of transforming
your woman into something more appealing than the current version.
Not only will giving your woman a makeover cheer you up a little, but
you'll also get a better price when it's time to sell!
Men are Pigs - according to 'Amy' ...
I am twenty one and I know that: ALL men want to spread their seed and
sleep around and the current hookup culture allows many of them to get
away with it. Men want women to look and act like a porn star and never
ask for anything!!!
Women are being used and tossed out under a false sense of
"liberation".
In school we were told that as long as we use protection then casual
sex is fine. My parents told me there's no problem with casual sex as long
as I use birth control. Well, women just ARN'T like men!! But no one ever
told us before, we had to learn it the hard way.
My expriences left me feeling hurt, confused, angry and hateful toward
men. I couldn't understad why men never called after sex and why they
never developed feelings. It's because men arn't like women, they just
don't have as many feelings. For the most part, men don't want attatchment
and love, the reject it and go to the next girl and the next and the next.
Casual sex FAILS women. It is a bitter FAILURE.
All the guys I meet are either a player or a loser.
In my experience the typical "nice" guy is an unnattractive loser, they
can only get sex through a long term relationship so they are the only
ones that commit.
9 times out of 10, if a man is handsome, he is a player, a dog, a
manipulator!!!!
The only way to stop these players is to wait as long as possible
before you sleep with them.
And if I have sex with a man then he better have something good for
me!!! Not some flab or lice!!! At least the whores are setting the price
for sex!!
It pays to be a whore!!
If I sleep with another man he better have something good for me
first!!!!
We need to reverse the bastard hookup culture which sexually exploits
women.
amy | February 25, 2009, 4:55am | #
Understand pig men?!! You better have something good for me before I
sleep with you!!!!! Not some flab or lice!! Men are decietful, unfeeling
parasites. Men want a girl to look and act like a porn star and never ask
for anything!!!
The only men that will commit these days are unnattractive losers.
At least the whores are setting the price for sex!!!
If a pig, a man, wants to fuck then he better go to a whore! I've
already heard all their callous lies. The assholes arn't fooling me
anymore!!!!!!
amy | February 25, 2009, 5:10am | #
Who's disgusting idea was it that casual sex is "liberating". They can
get stuffed. Ban the pill and bring back dating. Casual sex is sexual
exploitation of girls. period.
Men are dogs, users, manipulators they lie to girls and ply them with
alcohol and cajole them into sex. It's RAPE.
Men force their perversions onto women then they dump them and leave
them to pick up the broken pieces.
amy | February 25, 2009, 5:19am | #
I've seen men in action, a large slab of them are rapists. They're a
really nasty piece of work.
Even when guys ask girls on dates, they don't really want to spend time
with them, it's just a means to an end. They lie to girls, lead them on,
play mind games, ply them with alchol. If the girl doesn't put out after a
few dates then the filthy pig man will go to the next girl.
Today's dating and sex culture FAILS. Let's see it change ASAP!!!
amy | February 25, 2009, 5:25am | #
...and as soon as the filthy perverts sleep with a girl they dump her
for the next girl.
It's insane. The filthy perverted pigs are allowed to get away with
rape.
...............................
Methinks that poor Amy will probably make a fistful of false
accusations of rape in the future.
But, take note, Girls, that the hookup culture merely reflects the fact
that, as far as men are concerned, western women are gradually losing
their value - except when it comes to sex; e.g. see my most prescient
piece entitled Are Women
Becoming Redundant?
It was an idealistic vision swiftly shattered by the nightmare
reality: constant bitchiness, surging hormones, unchecked emotion,
attention-seeking and fashion rivalry so fierce it tore my staff apart.
LOL!
Good read!
It gives you some insight into just how childish, self-centred and
tantrumy are sooooooooooooooooooooooooo many women.
Who was it who suggested recently that women were just like children these
days?
Our precious molly-coddled princesses are clearly too self-aggrandised
to contemplate the possibility that any faults that they perceive in
others might, in fact, lie within themselves; which, indeed, they mostly
do!
Scientists suggest that it may be because big pupils indicate to a
woman that the man is sexually interested in them and available for
mating.
Er, No.
It's because having big pupils suggests drugs, alcohol, stupefaction,
drowsiness and/or idiocy.
"I'll easily be able fool him all right," is what
this
is all about!
There's nothing more likely to turn on a woman these days than the
thought that she might entrap a well-heeled nincompoop for a mate.
This is what is going on round here!
In the old days, those conniving Jezebels wanted the very opposite.
They wanted a man who had his wits about him - because he was going to be
around for a very long time if they wedded him.
Now, however, they want to mate with men whom they can easily fool and,
thereafter, dump - because the law will forever give them access to their
wallets.
This is what happens when you keep biting the hands that feed you.
The stress of balancing home and work, of caring for sick
relatives, and of feeling lonely after their children fly the nest - all
have contributed to what is becoming a 'crisis' in mental health.
Aw. Poor dears.
(LOL. Hehehe.)
Experts say middle-aged women, who grew up in the 1960s, are also
more likely than previous generations to feel they have achieved nothing
in their lives - [how right they are!] - making them depressed.
(Teeheeheeheehee.)
Young women suffered too, ...
Ho. Ho. Ho. Ho. Ho. Oh, this is just too much. My stomach is hurting.
Among all types of problem, women were more likely to be sufferers.
ROFLMHO!
Phew! I haven't laughed so much in ages. Make me a cup of tea, someone.
Among pensioners, women were more than twice as likely to have
mental problems than men. And married people were far less likely to be
depressed or anxious than single people or those who cohabit.
Let those selfish single hussies die alone, I say.
Most of them have spent most of their selfish lives supporting an
ideology that is based on hatred, and now they are paying the price. They
have been well and truly abandoned.
How can women be so stupid as to think that they can
ever benefit from continually
undermining and antagonising their very own men?
Well, I'll tell you.
By and large, any intelligence that women might have been endowed with
has been completely swamped by their unbridled collective selfishness.
Take it from me, it is no accident that throughout the ages women have
been regarded with a great deal of suspicion - in almost every society in
every land.
Yes indeed. Those ancients knew a thing or two about women. After all,
they had to live with them.
And there was no escape in those days - unless you became a monk, a
hermit or a soldier; which is why there were so many monks, hermits and
soldiers in those far-oft times.
Huge armies of them, in fact.
But all the other men had to endure. And endure they did. For the sake
of peace if nothing else.
Ho Hum. Never mind. Women will soon be begging for our forgiveness.
But, of course, we shall have none of it!
No way Hosé!
Let those harlots suffer for a thousand years, I say.
Let their juices remain untapped and their pretty clothes unremarked
upon - for at least two thousand
years.
Yes indeed. We shall ignore them for at least two millennia. Three, if
they do not shape up fast enough.
"Women? What women?" we shall say. "We can see no women round here.
Pray, let us away to our football match, and thence to our video games,
before we partake of a wholesome meal and a beer or two."
And that's on a work day!
Ah yes. There are surely many good times ahead.
...
Hush. Hush. Can I hear a voice in the distance?
"Harry. Harry. Your supper is ready. Don't be too long, or it will get
cold."
How strange. I must be imagining things. For there are no longer any
women round here!
No Sirree!
As far as Angry Harry is concerned, women do not exist.
According to Susie Ambrose, a marital psychotherapist ... ''We are being targeted by women on the fence between leaving their husbands who are on the brink of losing their wealth, and wanting to meet someone extremely rich straight away,'' she
says.
However, the general idea behind trying to prevent DNA testing to demonstrate
paternity is the same one that is promoting "all types of family."
The feminists and the governing elite want to break down all
types of close relationships - and removing the connection between DNA and
'family' is just one small part of this overall endeavour.
I just had to pinch the following long extract to demonstrate to my most
excellent readers that the times are gradually a-changing ...
On Wednesday, BBC4 had a film of a woman talking banal rubbish — not in itself especially remarkable. However, she was talking while surgeons sawed off the top of her head and poked around with long pointy things inside her brain. Then they proceeded to slice gobbets of grey sponge out of her cerebellum, chopping through arteries and — just for a change — zapping her with electrodes implanted directly into her brain. None of this made the slightest difference to the stuff coming out of the woman’s mouth. She continued jabbering as the sawbones went about their work, the top of her skull perched beside her like a very messy
ashtray.
This was Blood and Guts — A History of Surgery, presented by a dutifully awe-stricken chap called Michael Mosley. The point of this particular sequence was supposedly to show how infinitely complex and localised in its functions the brain really is. Well, maybe. But I suspect if you’d scooped out her entire brain and put it in a blender with sour cream, garlic and dill, then it would have had no effect on what this woman was saying: the same stuff would have kept on coming, and coming. My thesis has always been that when women speak, they do so independently of their brain — perhaps through some mysterious, as yet undiscovered organ — and I took this film as scientific confirmation of the fact. But I suppose it could be that there’s just one tiny, microscopic portion of the brain that controls women’s speech — and the rest deals with
shoes.
LOL!
The time is now 13:20 on Aug 23 2008, and I have just visited the BBC news
website upon which is stated that the ...
...............
MOST POPULAR STORIES
From UK in the past week
FRIDAY : Gary Glitter to sign sex register
THURSDAY : Gary Glitter to sign sex register
WEDNESDAY : 'Heart attack' halts Glitter trip
TUESDAY : Gary Glitter flown out of Vietnam
MONDAY : Paedophile 'librarian' is jailed
...............
... and I was wondering if, perchance, the reason for this apparently huge
amount of interest in paedophiles had something to do with the fact that the BBC
(and others) keep making stories about paedophiles their headline news items
Why?
Anyway - for those who have not seen it, here is a link to Paedogeddon!
- the Chris Morris, Brass Eye, CH4 spoof documentary about paedophiles - which
caused much outrage at the time - and also much humour.
The spoof is designed to poke fun at all the paedophile hysteria and it does
this very well by caricaturising it.
What is particularly funny is the way in which a number of celebrities were
made to say such stupid things about paedophiles. (These celebrities were
hoodwinked into believing that they were appearing on the screen to warn
children about paedophiles.)
In one case, for example, a celebrity tries to explain that the genes of
paedophiles are different from those of normal people and that they also have
the genes of lobsters. And he clearly believes what he is saying - making a
complete fool of himself.
But the point of the hoax was to show that celebrities would say
absolutely anything about paedophiles - no matter how ridiculous - thus
demonstrating to the public just how gullible and ignorant were those who were
quite prepared to preach to us on the matter.
The 25 minute programme is in three parts and the link above takes you to the
first part. You will need to LogIn with YouTube in order to see this programme
because it has been deemed unsuitable for those under 18.
Goodness knows why - given that youngsters are forever being told about
paedophiles.
...
For any newcomers reading this, the hysteria over paedophiles has been
continually generated over the past two decades for the simple reason that so
many powerful groups of people profit from it. The feminists, the
government and the vast abuse industry have billions of dollars and hundreds of
empires that can survive only if they keep generating abuse hysteria. And the
same is true for much of the media.
And the reason that this is a "men's issue" is because all
men are being demonised by the hysteria and by the way this issue is generally
handled.
To reach this post-sex world, Dr Sparrow said parents wanting the best for their children should start choosing baby girls through IVF because they live longer and have more opportunities in life.
I see that you work for the Centre of Bioethics at Monash University.
BioETHICS, eh?
Do you **really** think that it is 'ethical' to suggest to
the world that because men currently have poorer health prospects than women
that they should be extinguished?
You sound just like Hitler!
Take my advice.
It is probably best if you do not continue to promote such a view.
You would not believe the amount of sh#t that will likely come your way if
you continue to promote such hatred.
Solicitor Sarah Harman [sister of Harriet Harman] who is representing 13
of the abused women, said: "Britten portrayed himself to these vulnerable
and young women as a romantic hero.
"The fact was he behaved like a paedophile, some of them under the
age of 18. They were pre-pubescent because of the effect of anorexia – many of
them were sexually inexperienced.
That's right, Boys. You are a paedophile if you have sex with a 17 year-old,
and/or a paedophile if your woman has shaved her nether regions.
Now, I have no wish to suggest that David Britten - the alleged instigator of
these numerous sexual affairs with anorexic women - has behaved very well at all
(in fact, he is probably a scumbag) but watching the CH4 News about this situation I could not help noticing
that when a man seduces a woman into having sex with him he is often deemed by
the feminist-dominated media to be 'manipulating' the woman or 'grooming' her.
The idea behind this hate-stirring propaganda is to demonise men whenever
they try to make themselves attractive enough for some woman to want to sleep
with them.
Last night the Daily Mail discovered some of the shocking content youngsters are putting up on these sites.
This includes a 14-year-old girl whose profile picture, which can be viewed by anyone, focuses on her breasts.
Another 15-year- old is smirking at the camera as she grabs her breasts.
Outrageous!
Why are these young girls doing such things? What makes them want to display
sexually in front of an audience? Who is encouraging them to do this?
Yes, you've got it folks. It's the tabloids themselves - and, of course, all
those 'babes' and under-clothed female 'celebrities' that they like to display
on their pages, on the TV and on the internet.
Ask anyone who works with boys - even as young as 7 - what they mostly want
to be and whom they desperately try to emulate?
Footballers and sportsmen.
Their heads are full of it.
And the reason for this is that 16 year-olds (girls and boys) want to emulate
18 year-olds who seem to be 'popular'. And 14 year-olds want to emulate 16 year
olds. And 12 year-olds want to emulate 14 year olds. ... And 10 year-olds want
to emulate 12 year olds. Down the chain it goes.
So, of course, many young girls will be desperate to pose and to posture in a
provocative manner because this is what the tabloid media keep telling them will
make them popular.
Yep; the tabloids that love to generate hysteria and hatred over the
paedophiles and the sex-abusers are themselves MAJOR causes of
these very problems; the problems that they pretend to care about.
(Also see AH's piece entitled Chris Langham - Scapegoat? - part two
to get some further insight into this.)
"Teachers described highly permissive parents who admitted to indulging their children, often for the sake of peace or simply because they had run out of alternative incentives or sanctions," says the report.
Susan Pope, 45, was investigated by the police who decided she had done nothing wrong after she hit the boy on his
bottom.
How can parents possibly deal properly with their children when
politically-corrected police officers are likely to come knocking on their doors
to arrest them for the most ridiculous of reasons?
"But we are only doing our jobs," bleat the whining police
officers. "Do not blame us."
Yeah, right.
Do you know how many times I have seen or heard police officers admitting
to the fact that they "go after the easy pickings - the lowest apples on
the tree" because, so they claim, they get the same number of brownie
points for serious crimes as for trivial crimes?
Many times - is the correct answer.
In other words, these lazy sods are often admitting quite openly that they
cannot be bothered to deal with the harder crimes because it involves more
effort for the same number of brownie points.
And, of course, it is much easier to arrest a middle-class parent who is
sitting at home following a phony allegation of 'abuse' than it is to get off
their backsides and do the job that they are supposed to be doing - which is
protecting the public from serious crimes!
Quick! Lock up all your children - particularly your sons!
The reason I posted the above link was because the case of this paedophile
being deported to the UK from Australia was, needless to say, the very top item
on today's BBC 6 o'clock television news.
And, as per the article above, the increasingly tabloid BBC covered the event
in a manner designed to inflame the usual paedophile hysteria.
"Be careful of everyone; even of your own family members," was,
basically, the message that the BBC trumpeted with due gravity.
But the real interest behind this story was the fact that serious criminals
- of any persuasion - could be deported to the UK from a foreign country such as
Australia simply because they possessed British nationality. And, in this
particular case, the criminal had lived in Australia for the past 50 years.
And it is this latter fact that makes this story particularly interesting.
For the past 50 years this man has lived in Australia - from the age of 5 -
and now Australia can get rid of him and send him here.
And, of course, this is a serious issue that the public needs to be concerned
about.
Indeed, serious criminals - thousands of them -
are deported from countries every year to the countries of which they are
'nationals'. This causes real problems for the police and for the public.
And it is a problem that has been going on for years.
The BBC, however, together with much of the tabloid press, have had no real
interest in discussing the problems that we all face as a result of serious
criminals being shuffled from one country to another. Their only real concern is
to grab every opportunity that they can in order to inflame fear - in this case,
a fear of paedophiles - i.e. a fear of all men.
The difficult issues underlying these cases seem to be of little interest to
them.
Indeed, "Watch Out! Paedophile Enters Country!" just about sums up
the BBC's take on this case.
Finally, let me remind you all of the admission by various women journalists
and editors in the USA concerning the fact that, for decades, they colluded
together to do their best to demonise men and fathers by hyping up as much as
possible any tales of 'abuse' that they could get their hands upon - tales that
they generally stuck up on their front pages.
Well, believe me, those media wimmin whose main aim is to stir up hatred
towards men are still at it.
Tim Lott said the £30,000 Orange Prize - founded 13 years ago amid claims that women writers fared poorly in awards such as the Booker Prize - was "discriminatory, sexist and perverse".
Did you know that even though women read many more books than men, it is still
the case that the best-selling authors are male?
Yes indeed. Even women prefer male writers.
And who can blame them?
And now I am going to summarise all the books ever written by women.
Chapter 1: Women are victims. Men are ba*stards.
Chapter 2: Women are victims. Men are ba*stards.
Chapter 3: Women are victims. Men are ba*stards.
Final Chapter: Women are victims. Men are ba*stards.
The End.
They say that there are only seven basic plots in the world of human affairs.
And that all stories are simply re-arrangements of these very same plots. Well,
when it comes to female authors, there is usually only one plot.
And we all know what it is.
LOL!
OK. OK. I exaggerate - for effect! And I am sure that there many truly
fantastic female authors out there. In fact, I know there are.
But there are not as many of them as there are men.
And there never will be, no matter how much money sexist organisations like
Orange offer to women to come up with the goodies.
And I can tell you why.
Statistically speaking, men's brains are more various than are those of
women. Their thoughts and their experiences are, therefore, also going to be
more various than are those of women. Their thoughts and their experiences are,
therefore, going to be less commonplace - and, hence, more 'interesting' - than
are those of women.
And, as a result, their books are also going to be more interesting.
Indeed, in much the same way that the variation of genes allowed organisms to
diverge in their structures and their behaviours - thus allowing them to explore
and, thence, to exist inside different ecological environments - the variation
of brains has allowed humans to delve into cognitive arenas that were once
completely unexplored.
And given that the brains of men vary more so than do those of women, it is
men who will more likely enter those cognitive arenas that were once completely
unexplored.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again here. There is a coterie of very
powerful women who plan on allowing upper middle class and upper class women inexpensive access to artificial insemination. This group then plans on forcing the federal government to pay for the day-care and healthcare expenses of ALL children of single mothers, regardless of economic background. That will be their big coup. The Orwellian leap.
Gender feminism and its pseudo academic cousin, cultural studies, are fully ensconced in Marxism. The adherents of these false disciplines cannot think in any terms other than state entitlements and matriarchal protections. The matriarchal state plans on forcing men
to support other peoples' children so that they may achieve their utopia. It is that simple.
I've made jokes before about children at long tables in community halls, waving their little red books and singing hymns during the dinner time indoctrination. This is what the real gender feminists want. Make no mistakes. They have a plan, they have money, they have marketing, and they have the votes.
This will be easy to accomplish. Today's career women already play the dual-mentality game of claiming strength and independence while at the same time relying on the state to provide them with entitlements and confiscated wealth via the divorce courts. It will be very easy for a lot of women to say, "You see, we can raise children by ourselves!" while hapless fools unload bags of grain with United States Government into their
communal kitchens.
I believe that the alienation and destruction of men in divorce courts is also part of the plan. My theory is that
there has been a concerted effort to distance men emotionally, intellectually and morally from their own biological instincts to care for their children - to depersonalize them, in a sense, into believing that the only reason they exist is to write checks and go away.
The ease of filing false allegation charges, the VAWA, cruel child-support laws, the unjust pillaging of men's assets, the ascendence of false rape allegations - all of this has been constructed to tell men that
they are worthless and that the only thing that matters is their paychecks.
mruffolo ...
Feminist (man bad, woman good) legislation is big domestic business for the government and support agencies.
A country that worships women, children, and pets is willing to look the other way when corruption, lying, and injustice against their own men is obvious.
Legislators and citizens are willing to spend money and talent on programs with the buzz words of "family", "child support", domestic violence", "diversity", "children", and or "women's" in the title or mission, though these programs promote a divorce rate of one of the highest in the world of about 220 countries.
While America courts incarcerate a man for two years for killing a dog, they
waive a murderous woman's sentence. They also let a female teacher free who raped a boy, yet
they incarcerates a man for a decade who wrote dirty words to a boy in an Internet chat room.
I'm not surprised that after 400 years America was attacked behind its own borders. I am not surprised that China, a traditional patriarchal country, past America in foreign investments (after America was the number one innovator in the world for about 200 years). I am not surprised that the American dollar is being
devalued by major financial players.
America is unjust and unfair against its greatest asset - average men.
A huge slice of its £150 million income goes on PR and self-publicity, to raise the cash to put out more propaganda so that it can raise more money to put out more propaganda. Perhaps its new body of experts could start by looking into exploitative broadcasts where child actors pretend to be victims of abuse to guilt-trip innocent people into giving money. Now that's what I call irresponsible TV.
...............
Roll up! Roll up, Everybody!
Dust those cobwebs out of your wallet, and give Angry Harry some of that
hidden money of yours; because Angry Harry is going to start a new charity to
help children who are 'in need'.
Yo!
And for every $100 that he receives, Angry Harry is going to give one
whole dollar to those who help children.
Yes indeed. Angry Harry is a most kind and generous man.
Hey. Hold on, Angry Harry. If I give you $100, you're going to keep $99 for
yourself? Why, that's nothing but a scam!
No way! That's no scam at all. Because those children 'in need' will get a
whole dollar! A dollar that they would not have had before. I am doing them a
favour!
Yeah, right. But mostly a favour to you!
OK. OK. I'll change the percentage.
Instead of one dollar, I'll give them $10. How does that sound?
For every $100 that he receives, Angry Harry will now give those children 'in
need' ten whole dollars.
Yes indeed. Angry Harry's generosity knows no bounds.
No way, Angry Harry. You still get to keep keep $90. And this is still
nothing but a scam.
OK. OK. I'll change the percentage again. Instead of $10, I'll give those
kids $50.
So. For every $100, Angry Harry will give those children 'in need' fifty
whole dollars.
Now, how does that sound?
...................
Well, the final percentage - $50 out of every $100 - still sounds like a
scam, doesn't it?
And if you knew that every time you donated $100 to Angry Harry's new charity
for children 'in need', he put $50 into his own pocket, you would surely feel
somewhat cheated.
But, in fact, this is roughly what the NSPCC does.
Of course, in the case of the NSPCC, the 50% rake-off does not just go into
one person's pocket. It gets spread around all those people who work for the
NSPCC - either directly or indirectly.
But do not be fooled by this. Because the 'scam' is of the same magnitude.
...
... One year later ...
......................
A big Thank You to all of you who have donated to Angry Harry's charity.
Thanks to all of you, Angry Harry has now received donations of one million
dollars!
One million dollars!
Yo!
Indeed, so many cheques have come through the post, that Angry Harry has had
to employ a whole secretary to assist him in his work!
....................
Misogyny In America
The increasingly ridiculous Bob Herbert has an article in the New York Times
about "Politics and Misogyny".
It really is an appalling article.
Anyway. Here it is.
...
With Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s win in New Hampshire, gender issues are suddenly in the news. Where has everybody been?
If there was ever a story that deserved more coverage by the news media, it’s the dark persistence of misogyny in America. Sexism in its myriad destructive forms permeates nearly every aspect of American life. For many men, it’s the true national pastime, much bigger than baseball or football.
Little attention is being paid to the toll that misogyny takes on society in general, and women and girls in
particular.
Its forms are limitless. Hard-core pornography is a multibillion-dollar business, having spread far beyond the stereotyped raincoat crowd to anyone with a laptop and a password. Crowds of crazed photographers risk life and limb to get shots of Paris Hilton or Britney Spears without their underwear. At New York Jets home games, men regularly gather at Gate D to urge female fans to expose themselves.
Yeah right. Men drooling over women is a sign that they
hate them.
In its grimmest aspects, misogyny manifests itself in hideous violence — from brutal beatings and rape to outright torture and murder. Fifteen months ago, a gunman invaded an Amish schoolhouse in rural Pennsylvania, separated the girls from the boys, and then shot 10 of the girls, killing five.
Brainless Bob Herbert does not seem to be aware that
five times more men than women are murdered and, further, that when the genders
are 'separated' by those with murderous intent, it is nearly always
the men
- not the women - who are chosen to die.
The cable news channels revel in stories about women (almost always young and attractive) who come to a gruesome end at the hands of violent men. The stories seldom, if ever, raise the issue of misogyny, which permeates not just the crimes themselves, but the coverage as well.
Brainless Bob Herbert seems also to be unaware of the
fact that it is the feminists and their poodle boys themselves who
are permanently trying to highlight stories of violence against women and who
revel in them.
And, of course, this focus on women being victims comes
from Brainless Bob Herbert himself! - as evidenced by this very article; which
is ALL ABOUT violence against women and/or about them being 'victims'!
But Brainless Bob Herbert seems too stupid to notice
that he is talking about people just like himself.
Oh look. Here he goes again! ...
The latest of these obsessively covered stories concerned a pregnant marine, Maria Frances Lauterbach, who had complained to authorities that she had been raped by a fellow marine. Her body was found last week buried in a backyard fire pit in North Carolina.
It is Brainless Bob Herbert himself, and his cronies,
who are forever highlighting these issues.
It just so happens that the Democratic presidential candidates are campaigning this week in the misogyny capital of America: Nevada. It’s a perfect place to bring up the way women are viewed and treated in this society, but don’t hold your breath. Presidential wannabes are hardly in the habit of insulting the locals.
Prostitution is legal in much of Nevada and heavily promoted even where it’s not. In Las Vegas, where prostitution is illegal but flourishes nevertheless, Mayor Oscar Goodman has said that creating a series of legal, “magnificent” brothels would be a great development tool for his city.
The fundamental problem in all of this is that women and girls are dehumanized, opening the floodgates to every kind of mistreatment. “Once you dehumanize somebody, everything else is possible,” said Taina Bien-Aimé, executive director of the women’s advocacy group Equality Now.
A grotesque exercise in the dehumanization of women is carried out routinely at Sheri’s Ranch, a legal brothel about an hour’s ride outside of Vegas. There the women have to respond like Pavlov’s dog to an electronic bell that might ring at any hour of the day or night. At the sound of the bell, the prostitutes have five minutes to get to an assembly area where they line up, virtually naked, and submit to a humiliating inspection by any prospective customer who has happened to drop by.
Yeah right.
But what Brainless Bob Herbert fails to mention is that
the girls at Sheri's Ranch charge between $300 - $800 for twenty minutes of
action.
For that kind of money, I'll stand naked in the street
all day!
If you don’t think this is an issue worthy of a presidential campaign, consider the scandalous way that women are treated in the military and the fact that the winner of this election will become the commander in chief.
The sexual mistreatment of women in the military is widespread. The Defense Department financed a study in 2003 of female veterans seeking health assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Nearly a third of those surveyed said they had been the victim of a rape or attempted rape during their service.
And, as we know from the evidence, most of them lie.
The Associated Press reported in 2006 that more than 80 military recruiters had been disciplined over the course of a year because of sexual misconduct with young women and girls who had considered joining the military.
There continue to be widespread complaints from women about rape and other forms of sexual attacks in the military, and about a culture that tends to protect the attackers.
To what extent are the candidates of either party concerned about these matters? Do they have any sense of how extensive and debilitating the mistreatment of women and girls really is?
We’ve become so used to the disrespectful, degrading, contemptuous and even violent treatment of women that we hardly notice it. Staggering amounts of violence are unleashed against women and girls every day.
Let's read that again, shall we?
Staggering amounts of violence are unleashed against women and girls every day.
Oh really? Then men must be the victims
of a veritable holocaust of violence, because men are the
victims of violence many times more often than are women.
Fashionable ads in mainstream publications play off of that violence, exploiting themes of death and dismemberment, female submissiveness and child pornography.
If we’ve opened the door to the issue of sexism in the presidential campaign, then let’s have at it. It’s a big and important issue that deserves much more than lip service.
These young women seem less afraid of anything men are
actually doing than they are of male sexual desire itself. In the trenchant
words of columnist Angela Fiori “the campus date rape campaigns of the early
1990s weren’t motivated by a genuine concern for the well-being of women. They
were part of an ongoing attempt to delegitimize heterosexuality to young,
impressionable women by demonizing men as rapists.” Self-defense training, for
example, really serves to inculcate a defensive mentality toward men, making
trust and intimacy impossible.
Vanity, parasitism, paranoia and infidelity are only a few of the
unpleasant characteristics of contemporary Western womanhood; one more is
rudeness.
The attempt to realize a sexual utopia for women was doomed to failure
before it began. Women’s wishes aim at the impossible, conflict with one
another, and change unpredictably. Hence, any program to force men (or “society”)
to fulfill women’s wishes must fail, even if all men were willing to submit to
it. Pile entitlement upon entitlement for women, heap punishment after
punishment onto men: It cannot work, because women’s wishes will always
outpace legislation and lead to new demands.
Western women have been biting the hand that feeds them for several
decades now. It seems to me fair to say that the majority have willfully
forfeited the privilege of marrying decent men. It is time for men to abandon
the protector role and tell them they are going to be “liberated” from us
whether they wish it or not. They can hold down their own jobs, pay their own
bills, live, grow old, and finally die by themselves. Every step which has
brought them to this pass has involved an assertion of “rights” for
themselves and male concessions to them. Men would seem justified in saying to
them, not without a certain Schadenfreude, “you made your bed, now you can lie
in it—alone.”
The following quote made me laugh out loud for two whole minutes ...
Men, also, are most likely to marry when they do not understand women too
well.
A survey of BBC employees with profiles on the site showed that 11 times more of them class themselves as "liberal" than "conservative".
However, the notion that the word 'liberal' accurately
describes the stance of the majority of staff working at the BBC is precious
little more than a cruel deception.
These people are not 'liberal'. They are some of the
most bigoted, narrow-minded bunch of racists and sexists in the country.
In her book The Project 2000 Nurse, Ann Bradshaw, a specialist in palliative care, described how this agenda removed caring, kindness, compassion and dedication from nurse training. Student nurses now studied courses such as sociology, gender studies, politics, psychology, microbiology and management. They were assessed for their communication, management, problem- solving and analytical skills.
'Specific clinical nursing skills were not mentioned,' she wrote.
In short, nurses became too grand to care.
I wouldn't have believed this possible had I not been forced to witness how my own mother was treated in a London teaching hospital a few years ago.
Yes indeed, Girls. When you are sick, old or pregnant, you too can benefit
from yet another consequence of feminism. None of the (so-called) nurses will
give a damn about you, and, indeed - as per my most masterful pontification Women To Become 'Workers'
- neither will your children.
One of the main aims of the feminists, the abuse industry and the government
is to destroy people's relationships. And, in this particular case, it is the
relationships between nurses and their patients that are being destroyed.
On and on it goes.
The cost to all of us - of this revolting ideology - is just so enormous - in
so many areas - it makes me want to scream.
The analysis said Labour will never achieve its goal of persuading large numbers of lone parents to abandon a life on benefits because a huge proportion of them simply refuse to do
so.
Sacre Bleu!
And for all these years I have thought that women were not doing as well in
the workplace as men, statistically speaking, because they were being
discriminated against by the men.
Well, I'll be blowed. You learn something new every day.
Hmm. And what about the married mothers? You know, the ones who actually have
a husband to pay the bills. I wonder if they, too, are unhappy about going to
work.
My guess would be that their desire to commit themselves to the workplace
would be even less than that of single mothers.
I wonder, therefore, if, perchance, women do not climb as high in their
careers as men, nor earn as much as them, because they do not actually wish to
do so.
According to a psychologist whom I spoke to recently, false allegations by
youngsters and by young women often arise when they have 'failed' in some way.
Perhaps they failed to do well in an exam, failed to get a good job, failed to
achieve what their parents hoped for. And one rather common ploy seems to be to
make the claim that their failure is the result of some kind of abusive
experience. By doing this, accusations that, for example, they might be lazy,
incompetent etc etc can be deflected and replaced by a great deal of sympathy,
understanding, aggressive professional support and, in many cases, financial
compensation.
Instead of 'failures', they become 'heroes'.
And they can achieve this nowadays simply by making false accusations - at no
cost to themselves, even if they are found out.
"A work of fantasy, for example, could be looking at issues which may have to do with climate change and yet obviously have part and parcel of it something which shows women in a positive light and helps empower them in society."
The missus and I watched a few episodes of this silly programme only to be
disgusted at the blatant way in which the BBC was, yet again, pushing out
political propaganda under the guise of 'fiction' that was designed to give the
impression that the men of the 60s - in this case police officers - were riddled with homophobia and sexism.
And, interestingly, the programmes that teachers have recently been
complaining about the most because of their bad influence on the behaviour of
their pupils all come from the BBC; e.g. Little Britain, Eastenders, Catherine Tate.
As I have often said, the BBC is a major promoter of male hatred and bad
attitudes throughout the nation and a main aim of those who run it is to
continually stir up hatred towards white heterosexual men.
And the
fact that some police officers in the 60s might well have had the type of nasty characters depicted by
this programme is neither here nor there with regard to my complaint.
The point is that
the BBC is always very keen to stir up hatred towards white heterosexual men through
any means that it can; fiction, news, documentary etc. And in the programme
'Life on Mars', from what I have seen of it, this attempt is so embarrassingly
transparent that I cannot bear to watch it.
Not only did she have an abusive childhood but she has been associated, platonically and romantically, with men who have a history of violence, such as Sean Connery and George Best.
Even the love of her life, Hollywood actor James Coburn, threatened her with violence during the four years they lived together in the late
Seventies.
Who is the common denominator when it comes to all this 'violence', eh?
Well, it's Lynsey De Paul herself!
If you look closely at the women who, these days, publicly or
'officially' allege that they have been 'abused' or assaulted by their partners,
you will discover that it is they who are mostly the
problem, that it is they who appear to be a lifelong common denominator
when it comes to violence, and that it is they, themselves, who
are both prone to violence and prone to provoking it. (Some of the evidence for this is mentioned in my pieces Only Women Are Offered An Alternative To Domestic Violence
and Domestic Violence - It's Always The Same Women.)
Now, of course, most people will argue that violence is never
justified, but when it comes to conflicts between men and women, it is the
violence of women that is always so very conveniently overlooked.
And yet, not only does the valid research show that women are just as violent
as men within their relationships, but what is rarely addressed is the violence
that women inflict - or threaten to inflict - on men by using the arm of the
state to do their violence for them.
For example, having a man arrested is no less an act of violence than is
locking a woman up in a room and threatening her with a further loss of liberty
unless she conforms to certain demands.
And, for example again, taking away a man's children or his home - or
threatening to - or threatening him with something that is likely to affect him
very badly (e.g. a false accusation of abuse) is no less an act of violence - or
a threat of violence - than
is a physical, or threatened physical, assault - a fairly serious physical assault at that.
Furthermore, given that the law is now so very heavily biased against men when it
comes to relationship conflicts, it is hardly surprising that men might attempt
to use direct physical violence in order to 'persuade their partners of their point of
view' because, in practice, they have nowhere else to turn.
And, in my view, until the legal system is drastically reformed with regard
to the way in which it deals with relationship conflicts, violence against women
and, indeed, violence throughout society will simply escalate.
The Telegraph's leading headline of the day - as per above - is a good
example of the feminist-dominated media trying to pump up the view that the
killing of women soldiers is worse than the killing of men soldiers.
Well, what outrages me is the attempt by the Telegraph to downplay the
seriousness of situations wherein men soldiers are killed. The headline clearly
suggests that killing men is relatively OK, and that outrage is justified only
when women are killed. (Indeed, two men were also killed in the above incident -
but, apparently, there is no 'outrage' over their deaths.)
Angry Harry Discovers Infinity
Yes indeed. I think I have just figured out how to calculate the biggest number
that is actually calculable - but only in theory, thus far!
Firstly, you find a woman who supports feminism. And then you multiply her
state of ignorance about the world and its history by her levels of menstrual
spitefulness.
And, according to my calculations, this gives you an unbelievably huge number. It is a number that is larger
than all the quarks in the known Universe.
And that was just one woman!
Thus proving, beyond a shadow of doubt, that we must live in a
multiverse.
Just think. There are some other universes out there where you are living in
a world where feminism does not exist.
Since the rumours first appeared in 1981, the corporation has had to battle boycotts from Christian groups, cope with more than 200,000 telephone inquiries from customers and fight the ability of word-of-mouth — and latterly the internet — to disseminate
them.
She is doing what thousands of women do every week - attempting to get the
police to do their dirty work by claiming that she has been 'abused' in some
way.
Indeed, if police officers did not have to waste so much of their time - and
our money - being at the beck and call of hysterical and malicious women, they
could probably do something about the crime rate! And everyone, including women
and children, would then find themselves living in a far better world.
And it is certainly of no benefit to normal women to have their police forces
wasting their time on specious trivialities - because the crime rate that they
have to live with stays high - and is getting higher - nobody really believes
them any more when they have, in fact, been 'abused', and the male population's
attitude towards women in general takes a tumble.
In other words, in advance of any crime being
committed, it will be assumed at the outset that a woman is
entitled to a better form of treatment than a man.
Yes indeed; the very worst of female inmates are all
deserving of better treatment than all the male inmates - no
matter how harmless or innocuous the latter might be.
You could hardly think of a more sexist point of view.
"You killed your husband in order to get his money!? Then you will be
sent to a warm secure unit so that you can be near to your family and to your
friends."
And yet our deceptive politicians are forever claiming that
sex-discrimination is wrong, and, indeed, it is supposed to be against the law.
'Brutal' Assault On Commissioner Jan Schaefer - 30 secs
(To be filed in the Women Never Exaggerate section.)
However, I do not find the behaviour of this old woman
particularly amusing. She is purposely trying to exaggerate grossly the 'injury'
that she has endured, and she is attempting to get someone else into very serious
trouble. Essentially, she is dishonest, malicious and devious and she is playing
the victim card for all that she can get from it.
And, further, she is no different from millions of women who use
similar tactics to achieve similar aims.
The findings overturn conventional thinking on the nature versus nurture
debate.
Er, No. Not quite. Findings such as these are not new, and it was certainly
not 'conventional' thinking that led to the incorrect view that the environment
was virtually the sole determinant of a propensity to poor behaviour. It is the
dishonest politically-corrected emptyheads working in the social sciences who
for so many years have laboured to distort the truth about the huge influences
of genes on personality development who have been responsible for all the
hogwash that has pervaded the nature-nurture issue over the past three
decades.
Hamm's former boyfriend Maurice LaGrone Jr., 31, is serving a life
sentence for first-degree murder in the deaths of Hamm's children. He was
convicted in April.
The Government has unveiled a succession of initiatives to change machista
behaviour from the boardroom to the bedroom. It has made divorce easier,
legalised same-sex marriage and altered marriage contracts to specify that men
must do half the housework.
Yes indeed. The left-wing government has lost no time in feathering its own
nest by playing the well tried and tested 'women-are-forever-being-abused' angle
- even though it is men, even in Spain, who are the majority
of victims of violence and discrimination.
Always remember that those lofty parasites in government get their power and
their wealth only by forcibly taking these things away from the
people - mostly from men - whom they are supposed to be serving.
Of course, not all government officials and workers are
parasites. On the contrary, we need fairly big governments because our societies
are so complex. But large swathes of government - particularly left-wing
governments - are highly parasitic on the people - parasitic in the true sense
of the word; i.e. they harm the people and they profit very handsomely from
doing so.
When the dictator Francisco Franco died in 1975, after almost four decades
in power, it was illegal for women to work, own property, open a bank account or
even travel without their husband’s permission. Contraception, abortion and
adultery were all illegal, although in practice only women were penalised for
having an affair. Women did not even have full legal custody of their own
children.
Whatever the true situation was in Spain in those days, you can
bet your last dollar that the true situation for men was even worse.
For example, the fact that it was illegal for women to work, own property,
open a bank account or even travel without their husband’s permission, was
a way of making the husband responsible for anything
that went wrong; even as a result of his wife's actions. And that was not
good news for men living under such an awful dictatorship. They got clobbered
for everything that went awry. (Same with the Taliban.)
And if anyone thinks that going to 'work' 40 years ago and beyond was a
pleasure for most people, they are poorly educated indeed.
And can you imagine what it must have been like for the men to be seen as
solely responsible - financially, legally, and otherwise - for their women,
their children and their elderly relatives? (Same with the Taliban.)
No. Thank. You.
And as for the Contraception, abortion and adultery were all illegal, ...
etc, the notion that these should be seen as restrictions that affected only
women is risible.
Au contraire!
Indeed, which gender do you think more prefers having the ready
availability of Contraception, abortion and adultery, eh?
Women? Nope: I don't think so.
And, as for this, ... under planned reforms, the Spanish Crown will be inherited by the first-born child, rather than first male heir
I recommend my piece Women - Weak and Pathetic?
to gain some small insight into why males rather than females were the heirs to
the thrones and to the highest seats of power throughout history - power which,
by the way, they wielded mostly over men - just as they do
today.
The idea behind this is to undermine even further the
ability of parents to deal with their own children by, yet again, extending the
definition of 'abuse'. It is part and parcel of the abuse industry's main agenda;
which is to break up
families and to create further disharmony and insecurity among those who are in
close relationships.
As far as infringing children's human rights is
concerned, or their rights to dignity, there can surely be nothing more
deleterious to the well-being of children than undermining their parents.
As such, it is those working for the child-abuse
industry who should be prosecuted and punished for infringing our "children's
rights to dignity" by persistently attempting to poison the most
important relationships that children can have; viz; those with their parents.
Yep, Blair is now more desperate than ever to be seen
as a good guy.
I would also like to point out that the slave trade was
one of the very first things that ordinary Brits tried to get parliament to
abolish as soon as the franchise was extended beyond the confines of the landed
gentry and the rich back in the 1700's.
And the ordinary workers did not get the vote until
1867.
In other words, the majority of ordinary Brits were
opposed to the trade from the beginning, but they did not have the power to do
anything about it or, indeed, about many other things.
That baby could have been born with green skin and four pairs
of eyes in the centre of its chest and yet that no-good HUSSY
would still say that it looked like you.
Take my advice. If she
says it looks like you, go for a second opinion from a DNA-testing clinic. And
tell that harlot that unless the results are more than sixty trillion to one,
you want nothing more to do with her, because this proves, beyond doubt,
that she has been philandering with other men behind your back.
Then tell her
that you've had enough, that you can endure no more, and that you will no longer
be cuckolded and abused by such a wicked woman.
The girl said that the experience had left her afraid of being on her own. She said: "He has taken away my innocence and faith in people."
"I'm afraid now to be on my own and when I go out I feel I can't let my guard down, I'm always looking over my shoulder suspiciously at any men near me."
I don't believe her.
Mind you. I do not think that this young man behaved
very well. Nevertheless, I suppose that he thought he was doing her a favour.
After all, he will have been brought up to believe in the feminist-inspired myth
that sex for women is just the same as it is for men. Indeed, he was probably
disappointed that she did not writhe in uncontrolled ecstasy with every thrust.
But,
I can tell you now that women are definitely not all the same when it comes to
sex. No Sirree. While some will writhe hotly before you've even got up the
stairs - if you see what I mean - others are more like blocks of ice. You need a
blowtorch and a hammer-drill just to extract a tiny drop of their secret juices.
And with most women timing is
very important indeed. Is the moon in the right phase? Has Mars crossed Jupiter
recently? What is the weather like in Alaska at the moment? Is it raining in
Geneva? Is it snowing on Mount Etna?
These things are sexually important to a
woman. A change in the weather somewhere north of Newfoundland and her orgasm
has probably blown. After years of research and analysis, this is what my charts clearly
show.
You cannot just shunt your way
into her moist cavities and hope for the best. Indeed, there are many things that need to be considered before
embarking on these most dangerous of missions.
And for having sex with a brand
new
woman you really need to behave more like a bomb-disposal expert than an
American marine. You need to fiddle for hours with her little fuses before
prodding her wires with your pliers or she is likely to explode. Indeed, the
whole arduous enterprise is more like huffing and puffing your way up a huge
mountain that spans an entire continent than breezily floating downstream
without a care in the world.
And woe will most definitely betide you should
you utter the wrong syllable outside its divinely-allotted nano-second while
finely tuning her hidden dials, because she will likely transform before your
very eyes into a horrible gorgon with gnashing teeth.
And so my advice to young and inexperienced men is this. Go
for older women; especially nurses and policewomen. The nurses are always
pleasantly desperate and the policewomen are like rapacious baboons who will copulate
enthusiastically with almost anything that looks like a truncheon.
I kid you
not!
But forget the schoolteachers. They are an angry and aggressive bunch who
spend their days shouting at children. And it won't be long before they are
doing the very same to you. Besides which, they will probably give you homework
to do.
And, of course, older women are definitely the best - by a mile. You
just need to handle them with a bit of caution, that's all; so always have a
broom, a dustbin lid and a silver crucifix at the ready - preferably one that has been properly blessed by a high-ranking bishop - just in case of trouble;
and you should be OK.
But don't bother trying to plan any future together or
anything that involves charting a romantic course of action; because you've got
a better chance of getting a coin to land on its edge having tossed it from an
aeroplane on to a mattress in high winds.
There is just no way that
you can predict a woman. The world of physics does not apply in her case. There
is no formula or theorem that can guide you through the seething magma that
bubbles away haphazardly inside her head. And so it is best to regard her as an unpredictably
active volcano that will likely erupt every so often for no discernable reason.
Better
still, buy yourself a dog and take it out for walks or become a hermit.
That would be my advice.
....
'Some men spend a lifetime in an attempt to comprehend the complexities of women. Others pre-occupy themselves with somewhat simpler tasks, such as understanding the theory of relativity.' Albert
Einstein.
Ah yes, here we go again. Another woman tries to divert attention from her
own failings by seeking the support of the man-hating feminists and the
hysterical women's groups by offering her services to 'abused' women. She will
also, no doubt, offer some handsome donation to a domestic violence shelter, or
something similar, in a very public manner, to show everybody what a good person
she is.
Huh!
And poor old Paul McCartney seems to think that she might actually need
psychiatric help - which might well be the case - but women seem always to claim
to have been 'abused' whenever they are discovered to have behaved badly in some
way.
So, in that respect, she sounds quite normal to me.
Well, I'm not surprised quite frankly. Anyone who saw the England football
team at work would have felt like hitting something. And, if not the wife, who
else, eh? Tell me that if you will.
When Portugal won that penalty play-off even I had to give my missus a few
good right hooks just to ease the tension. And she'd have gotten a darn good
kicking if I'd also bet money on England to win.
That's what relationships are about, aren't they? Making your partner feel
better.
Duh!
Well, of course, I am joking, but I would not be surprised to find that
domestic violence calls increased during the World Cup. More alcohol was being
consumed. Women were getting tetchy about being ignored. The police plastered
the media with domestic violence campaigns encouraging women to call them. The
men were tense. Remote controls went missing. The police plastered the media
with domestic violence campaigns encouraging women to call them. The kids kept
talking. The wife kept moaning. The police plastered the media with domestic
violence campaigns encouraging women to call them.
And so on and so on it went.
So, no surprises really.
But, of course, we must always remember that many men often behave abominably
and many are very definitely prone to violence. They are not all innocent.
But, mostly, their aggression is directed at other men. And if
the police had done a proper survey of violence - domestic or otherwise - one
which included male victims - they would undoubtedly have found
that it was men who bore the brunt of any increase in violence around the time
of the World Cup.
(And I am excluding from my analysis those hooligans who were simply aggressed
against by other hooligans.)
Violence against men is a far, far bigger problem than is violence against
women.
There is no such thing as a woman who is beautiful both inside and out -
apart from my missus, of course!
Women who are beautiful on the outside suffer from delusions of grandeur on
the inside.
And women who are beautiful on the inside don't exist.
In a nutshell; all women are deeply flawed, but those with beauty on the
outside can easily dazzle the nincompoops (that's you) who fall for them, and
they can expertly divert most people's attention away from the horrible reality.
And, talking of women, did you know that in Iran there are more women going
to college than men? Yep; just like in the west - thus providing yet more
evidence to show that feminism has had precious little to do with the
'advancement of women'.
And do you know why more women than men go to college in Iran?
No?
Well, I'll tell you.
It's because in Iran (where, allegedly, women are oppressed) men are expected
to get their act together and go out to work at an early age in order to support their families;
whereas women are not.
It is their punishment for all the evil sins that they commit every
day against men; through thought, word and deed.
It is their punishment from the Lord!
Leviticus 41;3 And the Lord said, "Let their skins wrinkle with a
tiny crinkle for every wicked thought, word and deed in which they most
heinously engage, every day! Let these hideous wrinkles multiply and so
expand their ghastly coverance throughout the years so that everyone can see the
accumulation of the wickedness that burns most horribly within their dastardly
souls - wickedness that only the wise can normally see."
And the Lord then turned to Mocob, son of Macob and brother of Hocob, and
said unto him, "Holy Mocob, is that really your wife? She looks like a
bloodhound sucking a lemon!"
To which Mocob raised his eyes to the Heavens and said: "No, thank
goodness. She is the daughter of Macob, brother of Nabob and son of Nobob."
"You mean she's yourSISTER!?" the
Lord spaketh in horror.
"Sadly, yes," admitted Mocob dolefully. "But she can
cook!"
"But she's as ugly .. as ugly .. well, .. she's as ugly as sin
itself," the Lord expletethed
The Lord then silenced his birds in the trees with a wave of his hand.
"And you have actually been living with that ... with that thing
... for how long exactly?"
"Since birth."
"Since birth? Sacre Bleu. I think there must be some
mistake."
The Lord shooketh his head in disbelief and silenced his lowing herds in
the fields with a wave of his hand. "No man should have to endure such
suffering," he mutterethed to himself. "The wickedness of women must
be kept hidden from view while their buds are ripe and their juices fresh, or no
man will ever be attracted to them. And then what, eh?"
The Lord scratchethed his head awhile, and silenced his winds with a wave
of his hand. "Aha. I know! I've got it. The wrinkles of humans shall lie
deep within what I shall, henceforth, call a soul. But the wrinkles shall be
added to with every malefaction, and they shall eventually burst forth upon
their faces so that everyone on Earth can recognise 'the evil ones'."
And so it came to pass that the skin of women wrinkled faster than the
skin of men.
And quite right too! The lives of these poor women have been destroyed
forever. Let us hope that they each receive $20 million dollars in compensation
- for every grope - nay, for every nano-grope - that they have had the terrible
misfortune to endure!
Of course, I am joking. 32 years is an outrageously barbaric sentence for
such a crime. But the handsome compensation awarded to women for their alleged
traumas in such cases these days guarantees that women will do everything that
they can in order to appear to be traumatised.
Breaking News from the NSPCC
Putin the Paedo
Staff at the NSPCC were outraged yesterday by what they
described as a heinous sexual assault by Russia's president on a poor
defenceless boy.
"This is what men do to boys," said Mary Marsh
director of financial operations. "They pick them up off the streets and
abuse them most heinously while no-one is looking. No child is safe where men
are to be found. This is why the NSPCC needs your money. This boy, and all those
little boys who witnessed this heinous assault, will be traumatised for life.
This is why the NSPCC needs your money. Every man is a potential paedophile. But
with your money we can help to ensure that no man ever dares to get close to a
child again. DONATE NOW!"
Tired and exhausted, David Beckham, Captain of the England World Cup football team,
and his wife return from Germany following England's defeat in the
quarter finals.
One woman, who admitted to pursuing a man purely for his sperm and now
receives a £346.50 monthly “bonus” from him, says: “It means he can’t
get a mortgage, but I don’t care, he wasn’t very nice to me — if he’d
behaved better I might have let him stick around.”
On the day of their 50th anniversary the reminiscing wife finds the negligee
she wore on her wedding night and puts it on. She goes to her husband and says,
"Honey, do you remember this?"
He looks up from his newspaper and says, "Yes dear, I do. You wore that
same negligee the night we were married."
She says, "Yes, that's right. Do you remember what you said to me that
night?"
He nods and says, "Yes dear, I still remember."
"Well, what was it?" she asks.
He's not much in the mood for this, but he sighs and responds, "Well,
honey, as I remember, I said, 'Oh baby, I'm going to suck the life out of those
boobs and screw your brains out."
She giggles and says, "Yes dear, that's it. That's exactly what you
said. So now it's fifty years later and I'm in the same negligee. What do you
have to say tonight?"
He looked her up and down, and replied, "Mission accomplished."
Hugo Quintas, 25, killed 23-year-old Hayley Richards at her flat in
Trowbridge, Wiltshire, last June after she admitted sleeping with another man.
Well, of course, I am sorry that this woman was murdered, but when a man
discovers that the woman bearing his child is sleeping with another man he is
likely to become rather upset - to say the least. After all, he has found
himself in the position of fathering a child with a woman who seems likely to be
promiscuous with other men, and apart from the justifiable jealousy and feelings
of betrayal that this might cause, he also stands to lose access to his child
while, further, having to give the very woman who cheated on him part of his
future earnings. In other words, he probably believed - quite correctly in my
view - that this woman was most likely to damage his life and that of his child
most significantly. As such, I am not surprised that he lashed out.
Furthermore, given that women who kill their partners as a result of much
less in the way of provocation seem to get off very lightly these days, my view
is that this man's sentence should also be similarly 'light'.
The court was told doctors agree that at the time of the killing
Chandrasekera had an abnormality of mind that impaired her responsibility for
her actions.
The 'abnormality of mind' seems to mean nothing more than that she was
extremely angry.
But, surely, that police officer was
pointing his finger at her! - which, as we should all know by now, is
nothing less than a heinous act of violence against a poor defenceless
woman, as outlined in the Pointing Finger At Woman legislation soon
to be enacted - for which, of course, the penalty for infringement will
be death!
How come a foot - which usually comes in pairs - costs $650 when a brain can
be snagged for a paltry $50, eh? Explain that to me if you will.
Eco-Motorcycle
(Designed By Harvard's Topmost Female Technical Experts)
Said Harvard professor Mzzzzzzzz Nancy Hopkins, "If this
positively huge breakthrough in fuel technology doesn't lead to at least four
Nobel prizes being handed out to the women who designed it, then this will be
further proof of how undervalued are women scientists all over the world and of
how oppressed and abused they remain when at home."
When asked to comment about whether she foresaw any practical
difficulties arising from the use of the new Eco-Motorcycle she said that women had
a different way of knowing, and that they were gradually liberating themselves
from the oppressive science of men.
Lovers sure are expensive these days. And this
is, of course, why I keep my missus. She's very cheap in comparison to most
other women; if you don't count the ulcers, the headaches, the tumours and the
occasional heart attacks.
My darling, my lover, my beautiful wife:
Marrying you screwed up my life.
Roses are red, violets are blue,
sugar is sweet and so were you.
But the roses have wilted, the violets are dead,
the sugar bowl's empty and so is your head.
I thought that I could hate no other.
Until, that is, I met your mother.
Your loving beauty would float with grace.
If only you could hide your face.
Kind, intelligent, loving and hot.
This describes what you are not.
I want to feel your warm embrace.
So here's a bag to cover your face.
I love your lips, your face, your eyes.
Damn, I'm good at telling lies!
I see your face when I am dreaming.
Which is why I mostly wake up screaming.
My feelings for you no words can tell.
Except for maybe "go to hell".
The £4.50 guide, which has sold 60,000 copies and is aimed at 14- to 16-year-olds, derides schoolwork and says "this stuff's far more useful to you (and more relevant) than all the subjects you'll do in your exams".
Not only is the royal borough one of the wealthiest in the country, it also has the highest ratio of single women to single
men.
No surprises there! The country's floosies
clearly congregate where the smell of money densely permeates the ether.
Angry Harry's latest girlfriend ...
Previous one ...
The Benefits of Reading Angry Harry ...
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Drugs: the real deal
This is the first ranking based upon scientific evidence of harm to both individuals and society. It was devised by government advisers - then ignored by ministers because of its controversial findings
Women
Must Be On Spanish Coins And Men Must Do Housework 
Tories
To Portray Men As Tossers 
My darling, my lover, my beautiful wife:
UK
Love Map 
