|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism
Recent comments from some emails - mostly from
men - which can be viewed in full
here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of
them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own
sanity in a world gone mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for
years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools
And Feminists
Women -
Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
Rape Baloney
Harriet
Harman Sucks
Are you an
intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then
please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable
and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of
the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your
intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism
for yourself.
| |
|
27/07/05
Sorry, Girls
Adam Sherwin
The
Times
HAS George Clooney sold his last Martini? Will macho heart-throbs never again
seduce women into taking another glass?
Drinks companies have been ordered to hire paunchy, balding men for
advertisements to meet new rules forbidding any link between women’s drinking
and sex. Watchdogs have issued a list of undesirable male characteristics that
advertisers must abide by in order to comply with tougher rules designed to
separate alcohol from sexual success.
Lambrini, the popular sparkling drink, is the first to suffer. Its
manufacturers have complained after watchdogs rejected its latest campaign
because it depicted women flirting with a man who was deemed too attractive.
The offending poster featured three women “hooking” a slim, young man in
a parody of a fairground game scene. Harmless fun to lead its summer campaign,
Lambrini argued.
But the Committee of Advertising Practice declared: “We would advise that
the man in the picture should be unattractive — overweight, middle-aged,
balding etc.”
The ruling continued: “We consider that the advert is in danger of implying
that the drink may bring sexual/social success, because the man in question
looks quite attractive and desirable to the girls. If the man was clearly
unattractive, we think that this implication would be removed.”
The ruling comes after ministers’ warnings to the drinks industry to take
measures to tackle binge-drinking or face legislation.
The new CAP code instructs that “links must not be made between alcohol and
seduction, sexual activity or sexual success”. Romance and flirtation are not
forbidden but adverts must not be aimed at the under-18s or use celebrities in a
“sexy” or “cool” manner.
The Bacardi adverts that turned Vinnie Jones into a “party animal” would
now be banned, and the measure could affect George Clooney’s £2.5million deal
to advertise Martini.
The similarly desirable Brad Pitt reportedly earned £4 million for his
recent Heineken advert, which was shown mainly in America. However, the
family-sized Peter Kay will presumably be approved to retain his John Smith’s
contract.
Lambrini’s makers complained that the ruling was offensive to a large
tranche of the male population. Are Jack Nicholson, Bruce Willis, Sean Connery
and Ray Winstone unattractive to women, the company asked? John Halewood, the
Lambrini owner, said: “The watchdog makes some very understandable rulings to
encourage sensible drinking but we’re not sure they’re qualified to decide
for the nation who’s sexy and who’s not. “Beauty is, after all, in the eye
of the beholder.” Lambrini has now recreated its advert employing a balding,
male figure whose lack of pulchritude has proved acceptable to the watchdog.
.....but will it hit sirens of screen?
ADVERTISERS have reluctantly accepted that the blatant association of alcohol
with sexual opportunity has come to an end
Campaigns requiring a rethink include the Carling advert showing a man
licking up beer which has been dribbled around a flat by a scantily clad female
Baileys echoed that campaign with a commercial in which a woman sniffed the
breath of presentable men in a bar to discover which one had snaffled her drink
Further adverts sparking criticism included Gordon’s Gin, which introduced
the concept of “strip chess”
The Boddingtons beer adverts with Melanie Sykes, the Mancunian model, would
be among the first to fall foul of the new ruling. Ms Sykes helped boost sales
from £50 million to £300 million in four years in the 1990s
One of the most popular series of television adverts ever could equally face
being taken off screen under the ruling. The Cinzano series in the late 1970s
played on the humour of the many ways in which bungling Leonard Rossiter could
pour his drink over an alluring Joan Collins
Smirnoff’s may have to rethink its campaign following it’s ‘Opera House’
adverts in which a passionate and attractive couple have to pretend, in order to
cover up their noisy activities, the woman is going into labour
|
| |
The so-called 'oppression' of
women ...




click a picture
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is.
And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's
health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to
women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being
designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in
social service care-homes as
boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their
children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide,
20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the
mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far
less in benefits from the government.
In other words, when compared to women, men are
significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their
children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit
system, and even when it comes to their
own personal
safety.
They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work
place.
How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
|