reading

Feminism Causes Traffic
Congestion and Global Warming

(click)

reading

 

world

 

 

Recent comments from some emails which can be viewed in full here. ...

"I cannot thank you enough."

"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."

"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."

"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "

"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."

"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."

"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."

"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."

"It is terrific to happen upon your website."

"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."

"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)

"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)

"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."

"You are worth your weight in gold."

"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."

"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"

"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."

"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."

"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."


Before reading Angry Harry ...

clinton

After reading Angry Harry ...

clinton

 

 

27/06/03

Federal Judge Resigns, Calling Judicial System Unjust

Larry Neumeister

Associated Press

NEW YORK -- A federal judge said Tuesday he is quitting what he called an unjust criminal justice system, fed up with Congress' quest to boost prison sentences and prevent judges from deciding how long someone is imprisoned.

"Congress is mandating things simply because they want to show how tough they are on crime with no sense of whether this makes sense or is meaningful," Judge John S. Martin said in an interview with The Associated Press.

The result, he said, is a slew of lengthy prison sentences for low-level drug dealers "who society failed at every step."

"Sentences should be just. We shouldn't be putting everybody in jail for the rest of their life," Martin said.

Court officials announced Martin's resignation Tuesday. A one-time U.S. attorney, Martin said he plans to complete his caseload by the end of summer and re-enter private practice. He said he is considering organizing former federal judges and top prosecutors to lobby Congress to make guidelines more sensible.

Martin conceded he also wants to make more money after serving for 13 years in a judgeship that pays less than what second-year associates make at many law firms. Federal judges earn $154,700.

But he said the prime motivation came when President Bush signed into law April 30 a bill that forces federal judges to strictly follow sentencing guidelines. It also limits the number of judges sitting on a commission that determines the guidelines.

Among other prominent cases, Martin has presided over the pending lawsuit between insurers of the World Trade Center and the twin towers' leaseholder. He has also won a reputation as a judge capable of stern sentences _ in sentencing one violent gang member to life, Martin ordered the man held in solitary confinement and said he would have imposed death if he could.

Martin said he supports the premise of sentencing guidelines, which are meant to ensure sentencing nationwide is uniform. But he attacked what he said were efforts by Congress to impose harsh sentences, designed for the stereotypical criminal, on every defendant.

"Nobody in Congress wants to let an opponent have a 30-second commercial that says congressman so-and-so reduced the penalties for selling crack," the judge said.

Meanwhile, he said, the guidelines continue to treat crack cocaine as 100 times more dangerous than powered cocaine.

Martin wrote in an opinion column published in The New York Times Tuesday that he never thought he would leave the federal bench, a lifetime appointment that began May 22, 1990.

"While I might have stayed on despite the inadequate pay, I no longer want to be part of our unjust criminal justice system," he wrote.

 

under

Click for ...

popular

other

oxford

 

old

facts

spot

 

  bottom

bottom three

Share



thumbsup

world

popular othermp