|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism
Recent comments from some emails - mostly from
men - which can be viewed in full
here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of
them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own
sanity in a world gone mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for
years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools
And Feminists
Women -
Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
Rape Baloney
Harriet
Harman Sucks
Are you an
intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then
please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable
and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of
the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your
intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism
for yourself.
| |
|
Sorting Out Puzzle of Male Suicide
Joan Ryan
San
Francisco Chronicle
In a recent column about a UC Davis freshman who shot himself, I included a
statistic from the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Boys
commit 86 percent of all adolescent suicides.
Eighty-six percent.
The number floored me, particularly as the mother of a son. Yet not a single
e-mail, phone call or letter about the column mentioned the striking statistic.
It occurred to me that if 86 percent of adolescent suicides were girls, there
would be a national commission to find out why. There'd be front-page stories
and Oprah shows and nonprofit foundations throwing money at sociologists and
psychologists to study female self-destruction. My feminist sisters and I would
be asking, rightly, "What's wrong with a culture that drives girls, much
more than boys, to take their own lives?"
So why aren't we asking what's wrong with a culture that drives boys, much
more than girls, to take their own lives? Even in academia, where you can find
studies on the most obscure topics, there is little research explaining why boys
are disproportionately killing themselves. The Center for Adolescence at
Stanford, a nationally recognized clearinghouse on teen behavior, has no one on
its long roster of experts who can speak on the topic. Neither does the American
Association of Suicidology, an organization dedicated to suicide prevention
since 1968.
"As much as I would love to lead the charge (in finding out why boys
kill themselves), try to go out and get funding for it," said Lanny Berman,
the executive director of the association. He is frustrated that funders aren't
interested in studying boys and men.
"If there is no research money available, no academician is going to go
that route," he said. "As executive director, I have to pay attention
to fundable projects."
So the association has an expert on female suicide but none on male suicide,
even though suicide is an overwhelmingly male issue well beyond adolescence. Of
the 30,622 Americans of all ages who took their own lives in 2001, 24,672 were
men. I have been thinking about the people I know who committed suicide. My
grandfather. My Uncle Tommy. Two of my of father's closest friends. And, most
recently, the UC Davis freshman who is my friend's son. All men. I had never
noticed.
And it's not just an American phenomenon. Worldwide, men are three times more
likely to commit suicide than women. (China is the only country where men and
women kill themselves in about equal numbers.)
Some will argue that these statistics don't tell the whole story and are even
misleading. And to some extent, they would be right. Girls and women attempt
suicide at much higher rates than boys and men. So there is good reason to be
concerned about girls, too.
But most girls and women, fortunately, survive. They live to tell about it.
They can get counseling and address the problems that made them suicidal. They
survive, in great part, because they choose methods -- taking pills or cutting
themselves -- that allow for rescue or a change of heart, methods that often
simply fall short of completing the job. Boys and men tend to use guns or ropes,
which result in a much higher "completion rate," to use the experts'
language.
But to chalk up boys' high suicide rate simply to a different choice of
method is to ignore the reasons they make those choices. They could, of course,
choose methods that are not so immediately lethal. They don't, which means they
don't give anyone a chance to help them, and this seems to be the crucial factor
in understanding the suicide disparity between males and females.
This is what Berman of the suicidology association found a few years ago when
he put together the association's one report on the topic, thanks to a small
grant. Women are socialized to feel little or no shame about being vulnerable or
dependent. But for men, seeking help suggests weakness and incompetence. It is
antithetical to the traditional male role. Power and control are critically
important to men, dating back surely to the days when a man's job was to hunt
dangerous prey. In their minds, seeking help means ceding power and control to
someone else. It means allowing themselves to be vulnerable.
I am always surprised -- though I shouldn't be by now -- at how differently
men and women connect with each other, particularly during a time of crisis. My
husband and his friends can spend the whole day together playing golf or
watching a ball game and go home without having gleaned any personal
information. A guy can be going through a divorce and his friends might never
know. The topic might never come up, even if the guy is crushed by the split.
Women, or at least the women I know, would return home with the complete
history of the relationship, the exact wording, setting and context of the key
break-up conversation, the name and credentials of the therapist she's seeing.
The feminist movement helped us recognize that we needed to be explicit in
teaching girls that it was OK to be smart, competitive and independent. Now we
need to be explicit in teaching our boys that it is OK to be vulnerable and to
ask for help. We need to give them the emotional language that does not come
naturally to them. At home and at school, we need to teach boys -- and reinforce
for girls -- that the brain needs tending just as the body does, and that when
brains get sick, they need doctors to help them heal.
Just as we enlisted fathers to empower their daughters, we need them now to
empower their sons. We mothers can tell our sons to talk about their feelings,
to teach them the signs of depression, to say it's OK to ask for help. But they
learn how to be men from their fathers.
If fathers say openly and repeatedly that acknowledging depression and
sadness is not a sign of personal weakness but of superior judgment, if they say
that getting help is their obligation as men so they can be good partners and
providers, then maybe we have a chance at changing the centuries of hard-wiring
that makes boys and men so much more violent than women -- whether toward others
or toward themselves.
And maybe more of our sons will live long enough to pass along those lessons
to their sons.
|
| |
The so-called 'oppression' of
women ...




click a picture
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is.
And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's
health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to
women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being
designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in
social service care-homes as
boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their
children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide,
20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the
mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far
less in benefits from the government.
In other words, when compared to women, men are
significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their
children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit
system, and even when it comes to their
own personal
safety.
They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work
place.
How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
|