|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Guide To Feminist Nonsense
Recent comments from some emails which can be
viewed in full here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I
read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are
indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have
changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for
hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly
wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I
regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your
website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making
your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!"
(from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours
of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular
basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone
mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98%
of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while
now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing
the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of
youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are
brilliant."
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools And Feminists
Women - Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
Rape Baloney
Harriet Harman Sucks
Are you an intelligent person who believes that
feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your
time to read the piece Equality Between
Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of
the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive
ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you
will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.
| |
|
23/10/03
Europe Squanders Billions
Spoiling MEPs
Kamal Ahmed
The
Observer
Among the smart cafés and the chic boutiques
of Strasbourg and Paris, the people who run Europe enjoy what might be described
as a sumptuous existence. With free travel, generous pensions, unchecked
expenses and allowances for simply turning up for work, members of the European
Parliament enjoy perks usually reserved for the chief executives of private
companies.
But a series of devastating reports, to be
published in the next month, will once again raise the question of profligacy,
waste and mismanagement at the heart of the European Union.
The National Audit Office will report that the
EU loses up to £3.5 billion of its annual £60 billion budget every year
because of lax controls on funding, an inability to manage costs and little
knowledge of where money goes or what it is spent on.
The allocation of cash is so complex that it
takes years to get development money to the overseas projects it is supposed to
help. Instead millions of pounds languish unused in obscure accounts.
The report, based on a series of damning
analyses of EU financing by the European Court of Auditors, will be seized on by
critics of the EU as yet another example of why Britain should loosen its bonds
with the continent, not strengthen them.
But a growing chorus of pro-European voices is
also now questioning the management and 'junket' culture of the EU, which is
leading to an ever-burgeoning elite out of touch with the views or lifestyles of
the vast majority of citizens. Some of the closest scrutuny will be on the
lifestyle of MEPs, whose expense-account lifestyle would make the fastest-living
City whizz kid blush.
Daniel Hannan, Conservative MEP for south-east
England, told The Observer that British colleagues could make up to £1,000 a
month tax-free profit perfectly legitimately from the remarkable 'mileage
system' of guaranteed travelling expenses. Commissioners receive similar perks.
The EU allows all MEPs one first-class return
air fare to Brussels or Strasbourg from the airport nearest their home every
week.
But many MEPs actually book their standard air
tickets weeks in advance, taking advantage of low-cost airlines which can get
them to Brussels for less than £50. The 'reimbursement' of the first class air
fare is paid to them nevertheless, with a 20 per cent premium on top for
'extraneous extras'.
When they arrive in Brussels, MEPs and senior
staff are given a swipe card so that they can avoid queues and checking in
procedures. They are then greeted by hordes of lobbyists who offer free meals
and visits to sporting events. Hannan said that if he wanted to, he could dine
free at the best restaurants in Brussels every day of the week. And there is
more. Each MEP gets a daily attendance allowance for turning up to the European
Parliament and signing a register each week, whether they are actually working
or not.
MEPs who sign the register before 10pm on a
Monday and leave after 8am the following Friday get a full five days' attendance
allowance of £770, even if they actually spend the week in their Tuscan holiday
home.
Hannan said that expenses are rarely audited
and that items such as postage and travel are 'unconditional', ie paid at
whatever rate the MEP chooses. Secretarial support costs are paid at £8,000 a
month, giving a salary of £96,000 a year, a figure which few MEPs actually have
to use to pay their office staff. The money is paid to them anyway.
'People pay their nephews, or other
relatives,' Hannan said. 'The lack of scrutiny is inexcusable.' Millions of
pounds of taxpayers' money is poured into the expenses black hole.
There have been half-hearted attempts to
reform the system for 20 years. The latest proposal to 'consolidate' MEPs
expenses and pay them only for costs actually incurred comes, though, with a
typical EU sting in the tail.
MEPs agreed to an expenses crackdown on the
condition that salaries were also looked at. They have now agreed a 13 per cent
pay increase from 2004 to 'buy out' the high level of expenses.
Beyond that, MEPs will also pay a historically
low 'EU tax' of just 17 per cent, well under half the amount of tax paid to
people earning similar salaries across the continent.
Their salaries, taking account of the low tax
rates, will increase by 25 per cent in total, rising to over £5,000 a month.
Even Europhiles are saying that the EU needs
to sort out its own house if it is to have any hope of selling itself to the
public.
But the NAO report will reveal that the
organisation is a long way from achieving that. It will list a litany of
projects that have gone wrong and money that has been wasted.
One section of the overall findings is
expected to concentrate on the European Court of Auditors' report on the
arrangements for funding countries about to enter the European Union, including
Poland and Hungary.
Despite the project being worth €470 million
(£300 million), the auditors found that the EU had little idea where the money
had gone.
'For the programmes, the Commission does not
document how or on what basis it makes key decisions such as determining the
size of the grants,' the European auditor reports, before revealing that there
is a 'lack of assessment by the Commission of the reliability of the budgetary
accounting processes'.
Similar problems were found in the way that
the Common Agricultural Policy operated, and funding arrangements for overseas
development projects.
The EU failed to spend £11.6 billion of its
budget last year because of the chaotic management system.
The auditors themselves, an EU body based in
Luxembourg, are not above criticism themselves.
A British official, Robert Dougal Watt, who
works for the auditors, circulated a document among staff last month alleging
high levels of nepotism and sexual harrassment.
'The key to the undermining of the sound
running of the institution has been nepotism, engaged in by several members of
the Court over a period of many years,' Watt said.
'Members have secured the employment by the
institution, even on posts reserved for permanent staff, of family and family
members of friends.
'These individuals had no previous knowledge
or experience of audit, prior to arriving in the Court.'
That, say many of the EU critics, is exactly
the problem of the whole European institution.
Some of the freebies on offer to Europe's fat
cat politicians:
· They can dine free every night with
lobbyists at top restaurants
· Up to £770 per week extra just for turning up to work
· A first-class return air fare from their home country every week
· Free tickets from lobbyists to soccer games and other events
· £96,000 for 'secretarial support' - even if they don't use it for staff
Their salaries are around £70,000 per
annum.
All figures are for the year 2002.
|
|
19/10/03
The Expenses Here are
Fabulous
Daniel Hannan
Daily
Telegraph
There is incredulity in Brussels that Iain
Duncan Smith is being investigated over the employment of his wife. It is quite
normal for Euro-MPs to keep friends and family on their payroll, and no one is
ever so indiscreet as to ask whether they actually work.
I wish I could tell you that the practice is
confined to continentals, but as far as I can establish a clear majority of
British MEPs also employ immediate family members. In fact, we're rather famous
for it. A French MEP once remarked: "What is it about you English? You
employ your wives, and you sleep with your staff."
Let me add immediately that many Euro-wives
are conscientious assistants who deserve every penny they get. But the point is
that they don't need to be: no one ever checks. The Court of Auditors did once
try to establish who the MEPs were employing - colleagues still shudder at the
memory - but no one has ever asked whether these employees earn their salaries.
The sums involved make Westminster look
positively Lilliputian. Our staff allowance is €12,305 (£8,620) a month -
enough to employ a genuine secretary, and a research assistant, and still have
50 or 60 grand left over for the missus.
The idea of auditing any of these expenses
strikes many Euro-MPs as sacrilegious - "an assault on the dignity of our
office" as an Italian friend grandly put it. So everything is done on the
basis of no receipts, no invoices. The most outrageous case is the travel
allowance, whereby MEPs get the equivalent of a full fare plus 20 per cent
regardless of how they actually make the journey. If you're prepared to fly
Ryanair from Stansted, you can easily trouser £600 a week - tax free, of
course, since it counts as expenses, not income.
The same applies to our "general expenses
allowance" (£2,540 a month) which is meant to cover petrol, postage and
the like, but which several members find convenient to have paid directly into
their current accounts.
Ditto the £180 daily attendance rate. In
theory, this is meant to pay for accommodation and meals. But most of us have
flats in Brussels, and you can always sub-let a room to your assistant for a
surprisingly high rate which you happen to make up to him through your staff
allowance. This would allow you to keep another £900 a week in more or less
clear profit. (Forget paying for meals: whenever you're hungry, you just stretch
out your arm and hail a passing lobbyist.)
Why am I telling you all this? It certainly
won't make me many friends. When I touched on the expenses system once before, I
was sent to Coventry - or "sent to Limoges", as amused French MEPs
called it. But I feel that it is important to look at the practice of Europe,
not just the theory.
As Euro-enthusiasts muster in defence of the
new constitution, we are once again being treated to some rather uplifting
rhetoric about peace and democracy and so forth. To quote the document itself:
"The Union is founded on the indivisible, universal values of human
dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity."
Yet behind these phrases is the reality of the
Brussels system: the sacking of whistleblowers, the Eurostat scandal, the
Committee of the Regions affair, the self-righteous bureaucracy, the complacent
Commissioners. And where are the MEPs, supposedly the people's tribunes? Why,
awarding themselves an additional perk of £35 a week to pay for any taxis that
they may be forced to use when the limousine service stops running at 10pm.
Again, let me stress that many MEPs are
scrupulous about their accounts, and some of them - notably the Tory budgets
wonk, Chris Heaton-Harris - have been relentless in exposing sleaze. But the
regime itself, despite ritual promises of reform, remains as rotten as ever. So
when you are next told that the Euro-constitution "will strengthen
democracy in Europe", bear in mind exactly whom you are being invited to
strengthen.
Daniel Hannan is a Conservative MEP for
South East England.
|
|
Corrupt MEPs Hundreds
of members of the European Parliament earn thousands of pounds a year extra in
allowances for parliamentary sessions that they do not attend, an MEP claims.
|
| |
The so-called 'oppression' of
women ...




click a picture
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there
is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on
men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly
compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources
being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men
make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes
as boys. They are many times more likely to be
wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They
are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times
more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times
more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned,
denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in
taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.
In
other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it
comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their
education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even
when it comes to their own personal safety.
They are nowadays also being
heavily discriminated against in the work place.
How is it possible,
therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
|