|
Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism
Recent comments from some emails - mostly from
men - which can be viewed in full
here. ...
"I cannot thank you enough."
"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."
"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."
"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "
"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."
"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."
"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."
"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of
them, ..."
"It is terrific to happen upon your website."
"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."
"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)
"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)
"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."
"You are worth your weight in gold."
"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own
sanity in a world gone mad."
"I ventured onto your site ... it's
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"
"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."
"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."
"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for
years."
"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."
"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."
What a Piece of Sh*t is Man
The Trojan Horses Of Feminism
Fools
And Feminists
Women -
Weak and Pathetic?
Were Women Oppressed in the West?
The
NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped
Rape Baloney
Harriet
Harman Sucks
Are you an
intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then
please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable
and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of
the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your
intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism
for yourself.
| |
|
24/01/03
Study
says boys do read, they just don't read books
Julie
Smyth
National
Post
Teachers should allow boys to bring Pokémon
trading cards into the classroom, let them go on Internet chat rooms and
encourage them to relate school texts to television shows such as the Simpsons,
the author of a new study on boys and literacy says.
Boys have traditionally performed more poorly
than girls in reading and writing tests, but researchers who tracked boys in six
elementary classrooms in Alberta over two years say such tests may not reflect
the level of literacy boys reach through non-traditional means.
The problem may be that they are simply bored
with the conventional curriculum, says the study, titled Morphing Literacy: Boys
Reshaping Their Literacy.
The study found it is a myth that boys do not
read.
While they are less interested in fiction or
traditional literature than girls are, they read more on the Internet and
memorize vast amounts of detailed material from games or stories they read in
the newspaper, the research showed.
"We have always been opposed to low
culture. That is not what we put in the curriculum," said Kathy Sanford,
assistant professor of education at the University of Victoria and co-author of
the study, which tracked students in Grade 3 to Grade 6.
"We are trying to elevate students, raise
them to a level of high culture. We are a bit snobbish, in some ways, about what
kids should be learning," she said.
There has been extensive debate over how to
improve boys' reading and writing levels, however boys may, in fact, be further
ahead than girls because of their extensive use of the Internet and computer
games, according to the study.
The researchers found boys are becoming
literate "in spite of school instruction," and may end up better
prepared for a career because their skills are more useful than being able to
write a narrative or analyze a work of fiction.
Teachers should use class time talking about
things boys relate to -- Pokémon characters, wrestling, sports, computer games
-- as a way of getting them interested in the more traditional reading
materials, Ms. Sanford said. They should also observe how boys use modern tools
to learn.
Teachers should not drop the traditional
reading materials but should allow students to be exposed to more popular
culture, she said.
"Boys are learning different things
because the things in school are not engaging them. Just because I love reading
novels does not mean novels are for everyone. When we look at the adult
population, many adults who are highly, highly successful don't read in those
genres," she said.
The researchers followed 29 boys in urban and
rural schools. They studied their behaviour and searched their backpacks and
desks for clues as to how they learn.
They found boys spend large amounts of time on
chat sites and Web sites to get tips on how to "cheat" or compete at
video games, read books about animals, sports and fantasy, and will pick up
magazines and newspapers to read hockey scores, entertainment stories or news
about things relevant to their lives, such as the death of Napster. One boy told
the researchers: "We have Napster on our computer, so that really got
me."
Heather Blair, assistant professor of
education at the University of Alberta and the second author of the report, said
teachers need to have a better understanding of how boys learn. "Some
school assignments are boring for boys."
Ms. Sanford said there is no reason why
students should not be allowed to bring games and unconventional material into
the class. "This is who they are. This is how they learn," she said.
Even television should be used to relate to more traditional materials used in
the class.
"There has been some research done on
kids learning a lot about story structure from watching WWF [professional
wrestling]. [Teachers should] draw on their interests and apply that to a
print-based story [the students] should know about," she said.
David Booth, a professor of education at the
University of Toronto and author of a new book on boys and literacy, said he
agrees teachers need to bring more outside materials and experiences into the
classroom to help boys improve, but he said he would not advocate using things
such as Pokémon cards to improve literacy.
"Schools have to recognize materials that
are of interest to boys. But I would not go as far as something like Pokémon.
The world of childhood does not belong in school,"said Mr. Booth, author of
Even Hockey Players Read.
Instead, he said, teachers should focus on
making literature relevant and interesting to boys. For example, if they are
reading a fictional story about hockey, the teachers could pull out the hockey
section of the newspaper.
Also see AH's Well Done the Girls?
|
| |
The so-called 'oppression' of
women ...




click a picture
Western men die some five years earlier than
women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is.
And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's
health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to
women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being
designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in
social service care-homes as
boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their
children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide,
20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be
imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the
mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far
less in benefits from the government.
In other words, when compared to women, men are
significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their
children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit
system, and even when it comes to their
own personal
safety.
They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work
place.
How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?
In what areas?
Where?
|