22/04/01 

The Culture of Critique

Professor Kevin Macdonald

Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

... Third-World immigration, affirmative action, anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial identity. ...

... Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people, ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there has been something more than natural change. ...

It's those Jews again!

A good read with Prof MacDonald determined to reveal how powerful Jewish people have had so much influence on the west - and why!

According to the prof, the plot is, basically, that certain influential Jewish people from the past (and, presumably, the present) have arranged matters to ensure that their 'own' religious groups 'survive' by driving forward policies that disempower 'hostile' Christians - particularly the male ones - in order to ensure that they, the Jews, are never persecuted again by them.

Bloody cheek!

Of course, one must always bear in mind when reading about such political machinations purportedly carried out by a certain 'race' or 'group', that 95% of people couldn't give a rat's arse about politics. They're far too busy with their jobs, their lives, gawping at soap operas, and sex. And they haven't got a clue what is supposedly being done 'on their behalf'!

Nevertheless, if the prof is right about a Jewish 'conspiracy', then where the Hell were our own Christian machinators and conspirators of the past when all this was going on? 

What were they up to, I wonder? 

And where are they now!? 

That's what I would like to know.

Lazy sods.

Well, those of you who regularly read Angry Harry - and so, presumably therefore, quite like what is said - are actually reading the written pieces of a lot of Jewish and black people who feel exactly the same way as you do about all sorts of things - marriage, freedom of speech, education, FEMINISM, political correctness, etc etc etc right through the WHOLE kaboodle. 

And so it seems that Jews and blacks are 'at one' with ultra-white Christian activist Angry Harry and his readers! 

Not all of them, of course. But there are some pretty influential ones whose writings are on this website!

And, remember, 95% of people couldn't give a rat's arse about politics anyway.

None of this makes the professor wrong - but he's clearly talking about a tiny, tiny number of people in his article - not the majority, and certainly not the mainstream Mr and Mrs Average.

And the same is clearly true even for the 'largest' and most extreme of examples that could be given when it comes to talking about those involved in a 'conspiracy' - for example, such as the 'conspiracy' alleged by those who deny the Holocaust!

It doesn't take more than a few thousand people to create and maintain such an illusion (which, I hasten to add, I don't believe it is). You only have to think of all the American cover-ups and deceptions over the years to see how easy it is to fool the people. And, goodness me, the entire western hemisphere has been bamboozled by deceitful feminists and certain 'charities' FOR DECADES - in front of our very own eyes!

It clearly isn't that hard to do!

My point is simply this. Even if some 'organisation' has been 'up to something', don't blame the 'people' for what ANY 'deceivers' have supposedly done 'in their name' because those 'people' will have been deceived just as much as the rest of us!

Further, and most importantly, notice as you read the prof's article that the alleged Jewish 'influences' were via money, contacts, media and legal work, religion and politics.

Wow!

But aren't these the best ways? 

The non-violent ways? 

And isn't that what we non-Jews do - and aspire to do?

Yep. It is EXACTLY what we also try to do.

It's the very game that we subscribe to. The very one that we believe in.

When your football team loses the match, in a fair game, with everyone sticking to the rules, only a fool blames the other side for winning!

If your team loses in fair circumstances, then it wasn't good enough. It's as simple as that.

And, if you're going to get mad, you'll get mad at YOUR OWN players and YOUR OWN managers for not being skilled enough. And for not trying hard enough. 

And that's exactly right. You blame the lazy sods who didn't do their job properly. You don't blame the other side for playing well.

So, if Jewish people, or any other groups, are indeed winning political battles and propaganda victories against your 'group', then blame YOUR OWN players and YOUR OWN managers for not doing better in the game that WE made the rules for. 

Don't blame Jewish groups for yelling on behalf of their people. Get YOUR OWN group yelling on your behalf.

And always remember that 95% of people couldn't give a rat's arse about politics. They're far too busy with their jobs, their lives, gawping at soap operas, and sex. And they haven't got a clue what is supposedly being done 'on their behalf'. 

So don't blame the ordinary folk or get angry with them.

If anything, get mad at your own team for failing to do its job of representing you properly.

17/5/01

Extreme Views

There was a very interesting remark made last week by Jon Ronson (Newsnight Review 11/05/01) that relaxed, but intrepid journalist, who has spent a great deal of time investigating people with 'extreme' views (e.g. those in the right-wing militia groups in the USA, and folk like David Icke who believes that the world is governed by a self-serving establishment of powerful 'Illuminati'). 

Jon Ronson (and I cannot quote him exactly) stated quite categorically that such people tended to be nowhere near as extreme as they were usually portrayed to be, nor as dreadful as people, in general, thought them to be as a result of such portrayals.

Well, this is Angry Harry's experience too! He talks to quite a few 'extremists' who pop in for visits - by email.

The media, as well as all the hysterical 'accusatory' groups (e.g. feminists, bodies like the Commission for Racial Equality, some charities etc) all have a vested interest in exaggerating about nearly everything that they don't like, and in stirring up the emotions, particularly the negative ones. And it is they who have the clout to mastermind the ways in which others (who often cannot fight back in the mainstream media) are portrayed.

This is why Angry Harry says, Go and look for yourself at what the 'extremists' say, particularly on the internet. And NEVER trust what the mainstream media or others with biased interests decide to say about them.