Angry Harry
Blog
 Page3
Your Emails

 

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

A Permanent Gender War?

Rape Baloney

                               

 

Self-Harm

According to the BBC - and to the politically-corrected 'professionals' who masquerade as therapists, psychologists etc etc - Women have higher rates of self-harm than men.

This, however, is not true.

It is one of the customary deceits that is designed to hide from the world that it is men, not women, who are the majority of victims of, in fact, most things.

The 'evidence' that women are more prone to self-harm than men is carefully selected in order to ensure that women appear to be the majority of victims when it comes to self-harm, and any type of self-harming that men are prone to engage in is sneakily categorised as something else.

For example, ...

Many people indulge in behaviour that's harmful to themselves, such as smoking or drinking to excess. But people don't smoke to damage themselves - harm is an unfortunate side-effect. The reason they smoke is for pleasure. Yet people who cut themselves intend to hurt themselves.

The idea here is to give the impression that the millions of people who smoke or drink to excess (men mostly) are not in any way attempting to harm themselves, but, in fact, a significant percentage of people actually do smoke or drink to excess precisely because they no longer care what harm they do to themselves - so miserable about themselves do they feel.

Men also self-harm in many other ways. They take drugs. They behave violently. They commit crimes. They no not bother to go out socially, to climb the career ladder, to study, to care about their general health.

"I don't care if I crash the car."

"I don't care if I get cancer."

"I don't care if I get caught."

"I don't care if I lose all my money."

There are numerous ways in which men self-harm, but these ways must be hidden from view lest the public wake up to the fact that women are not quite as deserving as men when it comes to receiving help for 'self-harm'.

Indeed, the fact that men self-harm more so than women is recognised quite happily and openly when it comes to debates about the reasons why men die earlier than women.

"It is all their fault," is how the general discourse about this matter goes.

"Men drink and smoke too much. They do dangerous things and get themselves killed. This is why they die younger than women. It's got nothing to do with the fact that they receive much poorer health care."

In other words, when the debate is to do with the reasons why men are outlived by women, the politically-corrected 'professionals' agree that men are self-harming more so than women (the implication being that men only have themselves to blame for harming themselves and, hence, for living shorter lives) but when the debate is about self-harm itself, the politically-corrected 'professionals' suddenly change their tack. They deny that men 'self-harm' more so than women!

But it gets worse.

If you take the trouble to wade through various current international reports (e.g. from the WHO) concerning the allegedly poorer health of women in developing countries, you will see that billions of extra dollars are now being diverted to support programs that are specifically concerned with women's health.

And yet, in nearly all these countries, the women still outlive the men!

So, how is it possible that the health of women is worse than that of men?

Well, here follows a crude outline of the scam currently being used by these international organisations to argue that women in the developing countries are, in fact, worse off than men when it comes to health, even though they live longer.

In the developing countries, the differences between the life expectancies of men and women are smaller than are the differences found in the more prosperous countries - such as those in the west. From this, it is argued that women - biologically speaking - should be outliving men. 

And, apparently, they should be outliving men by seven years! - just as they do in the more prosperous countries.

And so because the women in the developing countries do not live a full seven years longer than their men, this is said to be indicative of just how poor is their health compared to the health of their men.

In other words, it is increasingly being accepted that women should outlive men by about seven years - and, further, if they do not do this, then this is to be seen as an official indication that their health is poorer than that of their men.

Needless to say, the argument that the lesser longevity of men is due to inherent biological factors is also being used as an excuse for not helping men.

"What can we do? It's genetic. Nothing to do with us."

But you will not hear this same argument being used when it comes to all the medical issues that specifically concern women; such as breast or ovarian cancer; even though such things are also, clearly, and wholly, 'genetic' and 'biological' in origin.

In summary, it has been ordained that men die younger than women because it is their fault and because of their biology. Women, however, should simply live much longer than men, and they need many extra billions of dollars expended on them in order for this to happen.
 

When women were 'oppressed' ...








click a picture

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.