Angry Harry
Blog
 Page3
Your Emails

 

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

A Permanent Gender War?

Rape Baloney

                               

Typewriters Oppressed Women

Teddy Bear Teacher Returns To UK A British teacher jailed in Sudan for letting her class name a teddy bear Muhammad has spoken of her "ordeal", after returning to the UK.

Hurrah! Hurrah! Thanks to all the publicity and the vigorous interventions of our politicians and many leaders of the Muslim community, our teddy bear teacher is now back home.

BUT ...

Plight Of Five Kidnapped Men To Be Covered Up The UK government has condemned a videotape issued by the kidnappers of five British men held captive in Iraq.

The five men were seized on 29 May from Baghdad's finance ministry building by gunmen disguised as police officers.

They have been held captive for more than six months but, of course, you have never even heard of these men, right?

No vigorous interventions of our politicians and many leaders of the Muslim community there, eh?

The Foreign Office spokesman said: "No matter what the cause, hostage-taking can never be justified."

Oh really?

Then, presumably, and for example, the prison at Guantanamo Bay can never be justified!

What a load of hooey.

Of course hostage taking is justified!

The Americans have justified it for years!

When you are at war, taking hostages is part of the deal. It always has been.

In fact, I am going to take Germaine Greer as a hostage when I finally flip my lid and decide that I can take it no longer. And then I am going to point this huge pistol at her ever-expanding backside and make her dance naked around the kitchen singing, "Angry Harry is so wonderful, Angry Harry is so right, Angry Harry is my master, He is my lovely shining light."

And then it will be days and days of cooking and housework for her!

And, in fact, I got very close indeed to planning her kidnap last night.

I had recorded what turned out to be a great documentary on the Hubble Telescope, and I had settled down on the sofa most happily with a nice cup of tea and a whole bar of chocolate in order to be comfortable while I luxuriated in all those amazing images of space.

Unfortunately, however, this Hubble programme was on the BBC, and my video recorder had picked up the last two minutes of the previous programme.

And what did I see? - a woman talking about typewriters - you know, those olden things with keyboards that had real life bits of metal that struck a carbon ribbon on to paper to make imprints of letters.

Oh look. Here's one!

And guess what this woman was telling us about typewriters?

Hold your breath and take your heart pills, because you are not going to believe it ..... 

Typewriters were used to oppress women!

Yep: Typewriters were invented to oppress women.

I nearly died.

I kid you not!

And, apparently, because of typewriters, women all over the world wherein typewriters were deployed suddenly found themselves even more oppressed than they were before - if such a thing is possible.

You see, these poor women - millions of them - were hauled out of their homes - by force I presume - to work in offices up and down the country, so that they could earn a buck or two.

And this was oppression of the most heinous kind.

You see; before the invention of typewriters, women could stay at home and say, "Oh dear, life is much too tough out there. Only a man can do those jobs." But when typewriters came along, women discovered to their horror that there was actually work that they could actually do, and so they no longer had an excuse to sit at home chatting all day.

In other words, they were psychologically oppressed out into the workplace.

Sacre Bleu!

I suspect that next week there will be a BBC programme on how vacuum cleaners oppressed women, because the arrival of vacuum cleaners meant that women felt obliged to vacuum their carpets.

And the week after that we will probably hear how public transport ruined women's lives by making the workplace more accessible. 

And by the end of the series I expect that we will discover that all of the advances in medicine were also designed to oppress women because by living longer and healthier lives women would end up doing more chores!

"This is outrageous," they will soon be complaining. "No longer can we die of cancer, consumption or reproductive complications. We have to go out to work! I am a victim. I am a victim. Oh cruel world. Oh vile men."

Anyway. The evening's viewing was not entirely soured.

The Hubble programme was fantastic, and then I watched a horror film called Descent, and was positively delighted to see six feisty feminist-type womenfolk being bitten horribly to death and partially devoured by a hidden tribe of gruesome flesh-eating zombies who dwelt in dark caves.

Anti-Gay Comments Could Bring Seven Years In Jail The Government is to make it a crime to incite hatred against gay people, Justice Secretary Jack Straw announced tonight.

Last week a group of firemen who shone their torches at four men engaged in illegal 'dogging' - outdoor sexual activity with strangers - were demoted and fined £1,000 by their bosses after being accused of being homophobic.

And yet they would probably have done the same with their torches if the philanderers had been heterosexual.

And I also do not see why minority groups should forever be being privileged compared to everyone else, i.e. compared to 'white heterosexual men'.

Mr Straw said: "It is a measure of how far we have come as a society in the last 10 years that we are now appalled by hatred and invective directed at people on the basis of their sexuality.

OK. OK. Fair enough.  But why is it all right for hatred and invective to be directed at 'men'? Surely, if hatred and invective are bad things for people to experience, then they are bad things for 'men' too!

So, why should 'men' not receive the same protections, eh?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Well, I'll tell you!

The answer is - and I am determined to get this into your heads, even if I have to bore you to death - is that there are many groups that profit very handsomely from the stirring up of hatred towards men.

And the government is one of them!

The government is one of the main beneficiaries of man hatred.

And this is why the government will do nothing to protect 'men' from all the "hatred and invective" that it claims to be so concerned about.

And now, I am going to quote my good self on this subject - it is part of a response to an email that I received - because I think that the points that follow are important to grasp. ...

..................................................................

Most of these feminist 'wimmin' and their lackey boys - such as those working at the BBC and, of course, lying female politicians like Harriet Harman - will scream and holler at you if you so much as make the mildest of criticisms against, say, blacks, Jews or gays. "By demonising them you will incite violence against them," they will proclaim hotly.

In other words, they are firmly of the view that people can be incited to violence against others merely by criticising them.

But they have no qualms at all about launching full campaigns of sheer hatred against men that go well beyond simple criticism - doing almost everything imaginable to portray - often very graphically - men as demons of one sort or another.

In other words, they believe that even mild criticism can incite violence against others, and yet they are perpetually demonising men in the most horrible way!

Tell me. What can you conclude from this? - other than that they are purposely and persistently trying to stir up violence against men!

There is no other realistic conclusion that you can come to!

Take it from me. These are really nasty people. And they are very much your enemy. And they are doing virtually everything that they can to fu#k up your life - and to profit from doing so.

Now, you might think that they do not, in fact, realise what they are doing. But, they do. They know exactly what they are doing.

I can assure you that lofty professionals who work in the media, in the government, in advertising, in long-time activist groups such as the NSPCC and the various women's groups are very much aware of the impact that they have on people. It is something that they obsess about all the time.

It is their business.

And, as I have pointed out, these people will mostly claim that even the mildest of criticism can incite people to violence.

So, please, please, do not delude yourself into thinking that these people are simply misguided.

They are not.

They are malicious. They are self-serving. And you are their whipping boy. They do not give a toss about stirring up hatred or violence towards 'men' - so long as they profit.

But they would not dream of doing this to other groups.

...................

Furthermore, not only do these people demonise men, they actually lie about them, and they purposely exaggerate their shortcomings with the specific intention of stirring up hatred towards them.

Indeed, the government also knows full well that it is 'men' who make up the vast majority of victims when it comes to violence.

And yet it is 'men' whom the government goes out of its way to demonise. And it is 'men' who are denied all the various protections to do with 'hate and invective'!

And, take it from me, they know exactly what they are doing.
Also see PC W*nkers In Blue 
 

When women were 'oppressed' ...








click a picture

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.