Angry Harry

Blog
Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism

Recent comments from some emails - mostly from men - which can be viewed in full here. ...

"I cannot thank you enough."

"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."

"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."

"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "

"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."

"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."

"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."

"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."

"It is terrific to happen upon your website."

"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."

"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)

"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)

"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."

"You are worth your weight in gold."

"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."

"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"

"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."

"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."

"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."

"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."

"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

Rape Baloney

Harriet Harman Sucks

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.

                               

18/07/04

The Case Against Paternity Fraud Laws In an era in which individuals and couples, heterosexual and homosexual, are embracing new reproductive technologies to create families, the biological connection often does not assist in establishing legal parentage for intended parents. Melanie Jacobs - arguing that paternity defrauded men should be still regarded as the 'legal' fathers - with all the responsibilities - if they have not challenged their paternity status within two years.

Notice how this feminist professor keeps repeating the mantra 'in the best interests of the child' in order to argue her case.

But she would not be using this mantra when it comes to issues surrounding, say, divorce.

In other words, if it is 'in the best interests of the child' to limit a paternity defrauded man's option to extricate himself from the fraud, then, surely, it is very definitely 'in the best interests of the child' to refuse to allow women to divorce their husbands, because divorce removes the real fathers from the lives of their very own offspring!

How can she insist on forcing non-fathers to be fathers - 'in the best interests of the child' - while being happy about women stopping real fathers from being fathers to their very own children?

And the answer to this is very simple.

This woman is not concerned at all about 'the best interests of the child'.

The whole notion about 'the best interests of the child' is nothing more than a dishonest ruse to bamboozle the public.

Indeed, whenever you hear the phrase 'in the best interests of the child' you can be fairly certain that the feminists or the government are seeking to empower themselves at the expense of men.

And Mz Jacobs is a typical feminist who is attempting to deceive the public about her real attitudes. Her sole concern is to empower women and, in this case, she is prepared to damage the lives of paternity defrauded men - and the children - in order to do so.

 If this woman truly believes that non-fathers should be forced into being fathers because this is 'in the best interests of the child' then she must also believe that it is wrong for the real fathers to be divorced from their very own children by the actions of the mothers.

But, of course, as a feminist - and judging by her article - we know that she does not believe this at all.

What this duplicitous woman really wants is this.

She wants women to be able to force non-fathers into being fathers, and she also wants them to be able to force real fathers into being non-fathers.

Basically, she wants women to do as they please, and for governments to create laws that would enable them to do as they please, regardless of how badly men or children might be affected.

Indeed, this is the state of affairs that exists currently.

 

The so-called 'oppression' of women ...









click a picture

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?