Angry Harry
Blog
Page3
Your Emails

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

10/9/01 American Men Are So Handsome There was an interesting programme in the series of Channel 4's Secret History a few days ago. It gave an insight into the circumstances which contributed to the dramatic increase in the crime rate in Britain during World War Two. From 1939 to 1945 the prison population grew by more than 40 per cent as life on the home front - when people endured bombing raids, shortages and tragedies - created ideal opportunities for those with criminal tendencies to break the law. Of particular interest was the way in which criminal activities 'of the dark' increased. In London, for example, there was a roaring trade in prostitution as soldiers home on leave came to the UK capital seeking the high life - cinema, dancing, gambling, night clubs, alcohol etc. And women came from as far away as Wales to enjoy the nightlife.  London was one of the most exciting places to be! There was an explosion of hedonism, perhaps partly as a result of the war itself. After all, people never knew what might happen tomorrow, or next month. There was uncertainty. And the policy of many was to live for the day. Indeed, many of the young women travelled to the city not only for leisure purposes but to take part in the lucrative sex trade. They were the 'amateur' prostitutes, who spent, perhaps, just a week or so in London in order to earn 'extra' money to take back home for scarce luxuries. When they ran out and needed more, they simply returned to the capital.  There were always thousands of American GI's in London and in other major cities, on leave for a couple of weeks, and they were very willing and eager to have a good time. And the American GI's were the tops. The UK girls adored them. They found them handsome, refreshing, fun and exhilarating. There was the Hollywood glamour about them, and they were considered to be very handsome indeed. They were romantic too. Of course, relatively speaking, they were also quite rich! And they were certainly good for a few presents, such as stockings and chocolates - which were rare commodities in war-time Britain. It was every young girl's dream to capture an American and marry him. And young women flocked to the cities in the hope of meeting that special one. But what about OUR boys? - one wonders. (The less handsome ones.) What about all the British young men from the towns and the villages? (The ones without the glamour.) What were THEY doing while their young female COUNTERPARTS lived it up in the cities and sought good-looking American husbands? Well. They were mostly surviving, dying or being damaged in the most horrible of circumstances somewhere abroad. But the programme didn't mention this.

GIs in West End were led astray by ‘young sluts and vicious debauchery’  The Times Good-time girls threatened morals, morale and international relations, the National Archive reveals THE “moral laxity” of women during the Second World War was perceived to be so degenerate that it strained relations between Britain and America. Ministers and their officials were so worried about the impact of promiscuity on public opinion in the United States that a series of high-level Whitehall meetings was held to devise ways of cracking down on immorality. The rift between Britain and its US ally came as thousands of American troops began to be stationed in or near London in 1942, documents released today at the National Archive in Kew, southwest London, reveal. While the popular impression of the influx of GIs was of an alluring group of men who were “overpaid, over-sexed and over here”, it transpires that they were not the sexual predators worrying Whitehall. Rather, the US troops proved to be irresistible to many British women, often living alone because of the war, and who in bleak wartime Britain were only too glad to grab the chance of some fun. American troops wrote home in such colourful terms about being propositioned by prostitutes and “good-time” girls in the West End of London that the US military demanded action be taken to curb the “debauchery”. So bad was the West End considered to be that US troops who caught venereal disease became known as “Piccadilly commandos”. A report by a Superintendent Cole, the West End’s senior police officer, noted: “This district is an acknowledged ‘mecca’ of Service personnel”. He played down the scale of prostitution but accepted there was a problem with “good-time girls”. American views were shared by many British officials who were anxious that the licenciousness be halted for fear of handing a propaganda victory to the Axis powers. These fears were heightened when stories appeared in US newspapers portraying the West End as a seething mass of loose women. Admiral Sir Edward Evans, of the London Civil Defence regional headquarters, described the scenes at Leicester Square in a letter in 1943 to Air Vice- Marshal Sir Philip Game, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner. “Leicester Square at night is the resort of the worst type of women and girls consorting with men of the British and American Forces, in which the latter seem to predominate,” he said. “Of course the American soldiers are encouraged by these young sluts, many of whom should be serving in the Forces. At night the Square is apparently given over to a vicious debauchery.” A memorandum to Herbert Morrison, the Home Secretary, said that “there is a widespread demoralisation among girls resulting in a conspicuous initiative to promiscuous relations on the part of many of them”. In April 1943 the Home Office held a conference to consider the issue of promiscuity in the West End and the resultant “venereal disease and bastardy”. It was attended by ministeries and allied military personnel. American officers were worried about the effect that venereal disease would have upon their manpower but at least one, Brigadier General Hawley, accepted there was “no more moral laxity in this country than in the US ”. A series of measures was proposed, including banning women from certain streets where they might meet GIs, but police were adamant that they were doing all that could be done and that the onus was on the US authorities to rein in their soldiers. Among moves taken by the US military was a scheme by which nurses would “discreetly” approach women who had passed on VD to troops to persuade them to be treated. Another was to reduce the money available to troops by encouraging them to bank a proportion of their pay. The Commissioner was impatient with American accusations that his men were doing too little. After a meeting with an American major and a judge he wrote: “I told them frankly it was our view the problem was best tackled from the other end, ie, by getting at the men and that, whilst it was a waste of breath to talk to a hard case, it was not a waste of breath to talk to a decent boy. “(The) Judge is very persistent in his idea that the boys should be able to write home saying that they never saw a doubtful lady in the streets of London. I pointed out that in these days it was quite impossible to distinguish many over-painted possibly respectable persons from the professionals and that to me, at any rate, they all looked the same.”

Daily Telegraph 13 Nov 2005 ... He survived the horrors of the trenches and the deprivations of a prisoner of war camp but for Pte Harry Nelson the deadliest blow came from the home front. A letter from his wife Lil, sent to him in 1915 while he was a prisoner of war, includes a stark admission of adultery and the heart-breaking news that she is to leave him for another man. Against the backdrop of the First World War this was a small personal tragedy. However, the devastating two page letter, found in a Government archive 90 years later, illustrates the high price that was paid even by some who did not lose their lives. The correspondence will be made available to the public tomorrow by the National Archive at Kew. Ministry of Defence officials kept a typed copy of Lil Nelson's letter. In it she told her husband, who served in the 1st Bn Queen's Royal West Surrey Regiment, that she had fallen in love with a man who helped her to cope with the deprivations of wartime London. "I had to get rid of most of the home, for I could not pay the rent but thank God I have found a friend that loves me," she wrote. "I hope you will not think it hard of me, but I am going right away in another land to a better home. Do not upset yourself over your little ones, for they are loved like me and well looked after. I hope you will not come and try and find me, nor take them away from me, for you are a man and I only a girl and their mother. "I am going where I shall be well off and happy." Mrs Nelson makes no allowances for the fact that her husband is a prisoner in Germany. She berates him for putting the happiness of his mother and sister before that of her own before he went off to war, and tells him his children regard her lover as their real father. She said her neighbours in Hammersmith, west London, still hold him in high regard and they will continue to write to him. She goes on to reveal: "I shall be a mother to his little one soon, but yours are loved just the same. "I hope you will not take this to heart too much for I know it is hard on you, but you will be better off without us, with your mother, and find someone to love better than me. I must close now, hoping you will not try and find us. Love from the little ones, they think he is their daddy (so he is)." Mrs Nelson ends her letter with: "Your wife in name only, Lil," before adding: "Please God look after you and bring you home safe. This has been hard on me and has driven me to this." Other documents show that Pte Nelson, who is believed to have survived the war, did everything possible to secure custody of his children. He wrote to the American ambassador in Berlin, who was then responsible for the welfare of British prisoners of war. In a letter sent to the American embassy in May 1915 he is particularly keen that he should be told the identity of his "betrayer". He wrote: "First and foremost ascertain the man's identity, and position. Also secure the custody of my three little children and place them under such care and supervision as you may deem advisable. "If it is possible to institute divorce proceedings before I return, please do so. I should like to mention that I can give no reason for this whatever, as for over five years, we have been on most happy terms, and I have no ideas who my betrayer is. Whatever action you may wish to take you have carte blanche to do so. Any further information you may require I shall be happy to supply you with." American officials appear to have been confused about the best course of action. One memo, which notes that Pte Nelson's wife has "run off with another man", states: "I am rather at a loss to know what to do about this."

American Civil War Many soldiers who fought in the 1861 to 1865 US Civil War suffered a LIFE of ill health afterwards, a study says.

 

When women were 'oppressed' ...









click a picture

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.