The film Innocence Lost was a documentary
shown on BBC2 about Bob Kelly, a man sentenced in 1992 to twelve life sentences
in prison for abusing children in, amongst other things, a spaceship. He, and
most of his colleagues, and his wife, and the female cook, and some twenty other
people, supposedly abused children in a nursery school called the Little Rascals
in Edmonton, North Carolina, in the USA.
There was no medical evidence for the
enormous objects apparently inserted into the rectums of these four-year olds.
There was no independent, unprompted complaint of abuse by any of the children.
In fact, there didn’t seem to be anything wrong at all. It was an open
nursery, with people, parents and staff, coming and going as they pleased; and
none of the doors was ever locked. There was no opportunity for abuse.
there had been sexual abuse on a spaceship
One watched the film incredulously as one
seven year old in court described how there had been sexual abuse on a
spaceship. One listened in amazement as another child stated that indecent
acts took place when they were all on a large boat surrounded by sharks, and that
he, himself, (a four-year old at the time) had to dive into the sea despite the
storm and the crashing waves, and rescue a little girl from the sharks and,
having done so, was then sexually abused by Bob Kelly when he returned to the
boat with the rescued girl. Bob Kelly then hoisted the sharks into his boat with
a large machine and took them home to his swimming pool, where many still lived.
And so the fantasies went on.
In the end,
despite the fact that many of the jurors stated that there was no
evidence against Bob Kelly and that the whole thing was a malicious farce, they
convicted him. Yes, they convicted him, because, you see, they had to reach a
decision; and some members of the jury were so indoctrinated by the poisonous feminist
lobbies and the propaganda from the child abuse industry that they refused to budge in their belief that a man who works with
children could be so innocent.
In fact, in the deliberation room, these jurors
became the type of self-appointed experts that we have grown so accustomed to
having to listen to. They went against the judge’s orders and, in breach of
the law, together they read a single article in an anti-male book about child
abusers (ostensibly to learn more about them) and, from this single piece of
junk propaganda, they decided that Bob Kelly fitted the part. He was a man.
He worked with children. And therefore he was a child abuser.
Those jurors who knew that Bob Kelly was innocent of
these ludicrous charges gave way eventually and decided to find him guilty
Those jurors who knew that Bob Kelly was innocent
of these ludicrous charges gave way eventually and decided to find him guilty, for they could
no longer take the bullying and the intransigence from the newly self-appointed experts
among them, and the deliberations were
clearly going to last forever. They had to get back to their homes and to their
jobs. And they were clearly going to get nowhere with their attempts to persuade
the newly self-appointed experts that they were talking rubbish.
was nothing that they could do.
They had lives to lead.
And so they convicted Bob Kelly
and went home.
Bob Kelly had insulted one of the mothers
So how did Bob Kelly get into this mess?
Well, what is clear is that Bob Kelly had insulted one of the mothers of the
children at his nursery, and she didn’t like him. He had told her that he
would not apologise to her over some incident concerning her son’s behaviour
in the nursery group. Thereafter, she started to make accusations. And so the
Chinese-whispers and the hysteria spread to the other mothers as they were
poisoned and alarmed by what was being said and rumoured, with hordes of them
appointing so-called therapists to investigate possible abuse.
therapists were delighted. They found abuse everywhere they looked. The smallest
detail of something said, and more sessions had to be booked to investigate
further. Session after session. Session after session. They pounded over and
over again. They invaded and assaulted the four-year old minds with questions of
the most vulgar nature and they smiled and cuddled the children warmly at every
inflexion which could suggest a sexual encounter with Bob Kelly, or anybody
It didn’t take long for the children to learn (subconsciously at first,
no doubt) that words of a certain nature brought about positive reinforcement
from the so-called therapists. "You poor child. You are so brave to tell us
children were criticised when they denied abuse.
In fact, children were criticised when
they denied abuse. Sandra and Mike told how their son showed no signs of
abuse until the so-called therapists had got hold of him - and when they did, he
began, after many sessions, to implicate many others, including the chief of
police and the mayor - whom they had never met.
Many of the parents were told by the so-called therapists to do ‘homework’
with their children every night and not to give them their dessert after supper
unless they confessed to abuse.
Many parents were told by the so-called
therapists to give daily readings in the evenings to encourage the children to
disclose abuse. For example, children were to read a book which described adult
animals abusing child animals. The stories would always end on a happy note,
with everything being ‘better and all right’ only when, of course, the child
animal disclosed the abuse. In other words, the children were not supposed to
feel all right until they disclosed some form of abuse from somewhere and by someone.
After weeks and weeks of such nightly
readings and several so-called therapy sessions, the children would describe
amazing accounts of abuse; spaceships - devil worship - human sacrifices and so
a prominent FBI official admitted that he does not
recommend videotaping child abuse investigation interviews because it
creates evidence that the defence attorneys can use.
In an attempt to hide the malicious and
fraudulent activities of so-called therapists, prosecutors in the US have
learned not to make video tapes of therapy sessions because they would show a
jury just how coercive and brain-washing they are. In fact, on a nationally
televised panel discussing ("When Children Testify," Frontline video
1991) a prominent FBI official
admitted that he does not recommend videotaping child abuse investigation
interviews because it creates evidence that the defence attorneys can use.
In the Little Rascals case, police
investigators and so-called therapists stated that they destroyed audio tapes of
initial interviews because the children had, as yet, made no accusations.
But why would they destroy them, eh?
Quite clearly, to hide the truth.
So, from absolutely nothing, came the
entire gamut of sexual possibility. The so-called therapists’ fees earned them
thousands and thousands of dollars and the gullible market paid more and more to
hear their lurid fabrications.
The status of the so-called therapists
rocketed as they extracted ‘information’ about spaceships, sharks and
impossible sexual encounters over months and months of interrogation.
all this was supported by feminists who publicly
applauded the bringing down of yet another male.
And all this was supported by feminists
who publicly applauded the bringing down of yet another male. They were
delighted that there was yet more proof of sexual abuse by men and they
applauded and cheered loudly when Bob Kelly was sent down; just as they did
outside the courtroom following the sickening amputation of a male penis by
Other people were horrified by the events
surrounding Bob Kelly; but the feminists were too busily congratulating
themselves on the demise of this innocent man’s freedom and the life sentences
that he received.
When it was found that women were also
being tried and convicted of the same abuse together with Bob Kelly, the
feminist mouths were closed; and the sisterhood focused their minds on other
matters, leaving the sick delusions of satanic-type abuse to the so-called therapists
The so-called therapists also 'discovered' that some twenty other individuals were involved in the
abuse of these very same children. And the child-abuse section of the legal
industry decided that all these people could be indicted simply on the basis of what these
children had eventually said after hours and hours of brainwashing by the
And what was the evidence?
from the eventual ludicrous accounts from the children who had been bombarded daily by their
parents and the so-called therapists ...
parent saw anything unusual at Little Rascals even when arriving in the
middle of the day.
- The prosecution could produce no
parents who had removed their children from the centre because they felt
that they were unhappy there in any way; in spite of all the symptoms that some of the
parents started to ‘remember’ after the so-called therapists and
some incompetent investigators handed out ‘symptom lists’.
- Several former Little Rascals’
teachers testified that they had never seen any evidence of sexual
- The children’s allegations also
included stories about the shooting and killing of babies in outer space.
- In all, the children eventually accused over 20
people of abusing them in some way - including the mayor and the chief of
police; and some of these people had
never even been to the Little Rascals nursery school.
- There were no medical findings whatsoever
that were consistent
with many of the allegations; in that, for example, the insertion of
large objects (including knives and forks) into the orifices of children
aged four, or the raping of them, would almost certainly have caused serious
injuries, but none was ever found, nor even complained of prior to
the whole disgraceful fiasco.
- Despite the attempt of the prosecution
to suggest that Bob Kelly was running a child pornography operation, not one
single photograph was ever found even after a massive search by the state and the
- Even during the trial,
and despite months of brainwashing by their parents and the so-called therapists,
some of the children initially continued to deny that they had ever
been abused when cross-examined. But,
after forceful coaxing by the prosecutors who asked them repeatedly to
remember what they had actually said months and years previously, some
began to 'remember' again what they were supposed to remember.
- Despite the prosecution’s claim that
the children’s accounts were consistent with each other, this was nothing
less than pure nonsense as was clearly evidenced throughout the entire
Bob Kelly was convicted of 99 out of the 100 counts of
So, in the end, Bob Kelly was convicted
of 99 out of the 100 counts of sexual abuse with which he was charged, and he is
now serving twelve consecutive life terms for these.
On which count was he not found
guilty - you might wonder. Well, despite the accusation that he had indulged in
sexual behaviours with his wife, Betsy, in front of some of the children, the
jury felt that she was such a nice woman and that she just would not have done
In other words, this single, particular implanted delusion,
outlined by some of the children, was not believed by the jury because Bob
Kelly's wife was seen to be a nice woman. Thus, in short, the fraudulent and
against Bob Kelly resulted in his conviction, but the same accusers were
not believed when it came to his wife Betsy.
(In all of this, we must remember that
many of the jurors convicted Bob Kelly, not because they believed him to be
guilty but because they felt that they had no choice - and they have signed
affidavits to this effect.)
Betsy was later indicted by the
prosecutors however, and she was convicted of 30 counts of sexual abuse in a
separate trial where she pleaded ‘no contest’ in exchange for a seven year
sentence instead of the many consecutive life sentences that she could have received.
She knew that without bargaining in this manner she stood no chance of a fair
trial because, by then, not only had Bob Kelly been convicted but so had Kathryn
Dawn Wilson, the Little Rascals’ cook. A young woman at the time, she had also
received a life sentence on the basis of the evidence adduced by the so-called
Many people who saw the film Lost Innocence,
sent away to the BBC for a factsheet on the film. It was heartening for them to know that there was a factsheet. The film was important. Many could
see this. They felt, at last, that the world was seeing the injustices being
done and how all too easy it was these days for any woman or child to
make a false accusation and completely destroy people without evidence, without
proof and certainly without justice.
Even if children claimed to have been abused in a spaceship, they would
be believed and someone would be sent down to prison for life. The film
was clear on this. It was obvious to everybody now. No
matter how ridiculous the allegations, no matter how clearly malicious the
intent, no matter how much money the people involved stood to make, no matter
how great the pressure to distort the facts or lie, if the accuser is a woman or
a child, they will probably be believed.
And the factsheet from the BBC about
Innocence Lost? A bit of common sense at last? The film had shown the disgusting
nature of the facts surrounding Bob Kelly’s case. It had demonstrated the
complete incompetence of the judicial system, the preposterous nature of the
evidence, the sheer stupidity of most of the so-called ‘professionals’ and
the jury’s thorough failure to deliver a just verdict. Even if the film was
later argued to be biased and one-sided, it was an important stepping stone in
the right direction. My goodness, even if it was fiction, it was going to be an
And the BBC factsheet?
nothing more than a propaganda text by someone calling themselves ‘AD’ stating that children ought to
be listened to more often!
Can you believe it?
The whole film was about the complete
falsity and fabrication of children’s evidence following psychologically
invasive therapy and the BBC factsheet for this film turns out to be a piece of
feminist propaganda telling everyone the complete opposite.
lines for people like Bob Kelly. No help groups for men who have suffered, might
suffer, or are suffering, from such false accusations. Oh no. The BBC’s
factsheet told us all to continue to watch out for male abusers. It told us that
when children lie it is to cover up abuse.
(So, presumably, if a child alleges
abuse in a spaceship, and is therefore demonstrably lying, this must be
evidence that the child is covering up abuse!)
Had the film been about homosexuality and
mostly about how homosexuals are being unfairly treated in the courts, what kind
of factsheet would make absolutely no mention of it?
If the film had been about bias against black people, and about the false accusations
made against them, what kind of factsheet would make absolutely no mention of
If the film had been about a woman, falsely accused and imprisoned for life
on the basis of totally unreliable evidence and via a corrupt and dishonest
system, one would expect an accompanying factsheet to mention it at the very
least! And one certainly would not expect a factsheet to further promote vile
injustice. But the BBC’s factsheet did just this. There was no reference to
the documentary at all! Nothing! Just more politically correct feminist
propaganda to instill further in everyone a fear of all men.
So, for all of you Brits who think that this couldn’t happen here, but only
in America, think again. That grand old British institution, the BBC, is most
definitely not the impartial organisation it purports to be. It is riddled with
feminist dogma and it is clearly as anti-male as most of the media.
For those of you who might still doubt this, one
should perhaps ask why it is that, at 4 o’clock on a Saturday afternoon
(October 7th 1995) a prime time for children’s viewing, children could watch a
whole hour of Oprah Winfrey talking to a woman who ‘had written a book’
about child abuse. Here is how Ms Winfrey started the programme.
"25% of men are abusers. They are
not the dirty old men in trenchcoats who lurk outside schoolyards. They are
young men who cook cheeseburgers on the outdoor grill. They’re patient men who
fix broken bicycles and family men who love cutting up Thanksgiving turkey and
watching baseball games in the summer. They are our husbands and our brothers,
our fathers and our sons. ..."
This is the BBC’s Saturday afternoon
viewing material for our children in Britain.