|
14/08/04
Rape Baloney
The evidence that I have seen shows that most allegations of rape made to the
police are false.
The 'research' that purports to show otherwise is mostly bogus.
Indeed, the very fact that the definition of 'rape' is completely fudged in most
of the 'research' in this area makes it impossible to evaluate it objectively.
However, if it is true that the vast majority of real rapes goes
unreported (which is the claim made by most rape 'researchers') and it is also true that the vast majority of rape allegations made to the police are
true (which is another claim made by most rape 'researchers') then it follows
logically that men are raping women many times more often than are women making false
allegations about such things.
But this is just not credible given that the evidence shows quite clearly that many women
will make such allegations for the most trivial of reasons e.g. in order to gain
sympathy. And if they will allege rape simply in order to
gain sympathy, then the mind boggles at how many women must be making false
allegations of rape for more 'urgent' reasons.
Indeed, it was only a few weeks ago that a
homeless man
was released following eight months in prison because three young women had
accused him of sexually-assaulting them simply in order to explain why they were
late for class!
Three of them!
And the feminist-inspired myth that the probability of an 'average' woman
making a false accusation of rape is far, far less than the probability of an
'average' man actually raping a woman is ridiculous.
Please bear with me for a moment.
Much of the rape research suggests that the majority of real rapes goes
unreported. In fact, the figures commonly bandied about suggest that only about
one-quarter of real rapes are reported to the police.
Now, imagine a town of 100 men and 100 women. And let us assume for the moment that the likelihood of a man
committing a rape is exactly the same as the likelihood of a woman making a false allegation
of rape.
Now, imagine that in this town four men commit a rape one
evening.
Well, the evidence suggests that only one of the raped women
(one-quarter of them) will actually report the matter to the police.
Now, since we are assuming that the likelihood of
a rape is the same as the likelihood of a false allegation of rape, then it follows that since four men committed a rape,
then four women will actually make a false allegation about rape.
And so five allegations of rape will be made to the
police.
But
only one of them will be true.
In other words, 80% of the allegations are false.
And please remember that this is assuming that men are
just as likely to rape
women as women are to make false allegations about rape - something which, quite
frankly, is preposterous.
And the only way in which it is possible for the vast majority
of rape allegations to be true while, at the same time, the vast majority of
real rapes goes unreported, is for men to be many times more
likely to rape women than are women likely to make false allegations about rape.
And this notion is even more preposterous.
Furthermore, there is surely very little doubt
that when intimates are having serious relationship problems - and it is under
these circumstances that most rape allegations are made - women
are far more likely to lie and make wild exaggerations of rape than are men in
these situations likely to rape them.
And yet, somehow, we are expected to believe that
some 80% of rape allegations are true,
and that some 75% of rapes go unreported. But if this were true, then it would
follow that men are sixteen
times
more likely to rape a woman than is a woman likely to make a false allegation of rape.
(The Maths goes like this. Imagine 100
allegations of rape are made to the police. 80% of them are assumed by the
researchers to be true.
So, 80 of these women will have been genuinely raped according to the
researchers. But because only 25% of
rapes are actually reported to the police, there were, in fact, according to the
researchers, 320 genuine
rapes altogether. Now, if 20% of all the allegations are said by the researchers
to be false, this means that 20 of
the allegations are deemed to be false. So, according to the researchers, we have 320 genuine rapes and 20 false
allegations. In other words, according to the researchers, there are 16 times as many rapes as there are false
allegations.)
In other words, for every woman who makes a false
allegation of rape - or even stumbles into making one - it is supposed to be the
case that sixteen men have actually committed a rape.
And, further, this is supposed to be true despite the fact
that we know that some women make false allegations of rape for the most trivial
of reasons and that many women often have a great deal to gain by making false allegations of rape;
whereas, on the other hand, men have a great deal to lose by
committing an act of rape.
Furthermore, women are encouraged daily
by the media to make allegations of 'abuse'.
All in all, therefore, the likelihood is very high that women are far more likely to make
false allegations than are men likely to commit acts of rape.
And if this is the case - which seems
HIGHLY likely - then even the high figure of 80% for false allegations (as in
our town of 100 men and 100 women - where the probabilities of real rapes and
false allegations are equal) is going to be an underestimate
of the proportion of the allegations that are false.
In other words, the likelihood is that more than 80%
of rape allegations made to the police are false.
And, indeed, the objective evidence is consistent
with this notion. For example, in the UK, for every 100 allegations of rape made
to the police, only 6 result in convictions.
Needless to say, however, the feminists, the
politically correct, the whole of the abuse industry and, of course, women
themselves, have huge vested interests in covering up the truth about this
matter.
They all gain enormous rewards by demonising men.
And their overall message is this.
Even though women gain numerous advantages from
alleging rape, and even though we know that millions of women behave
'irrationally' when they are 'emotional', and despite the fact that we know that women will even make such
allegations for the most selfish and trivial of reasons, men are so awful and
women are so innocent that the average male is still sixteen
times more likely to rape
a woman than is an average female likely to make a false
allegation!
And they want to see many more convictions.
And, typically, as the general public learns what
devious and dishonest propaganda these
groups promote, they will simply respond by jiggling around with all
their statistics in order to come up
with something more 'credible'.
This is how their hateful game is normally played.
Indeed, the forces that suppress
the truth about the rape figures are truly massive.
And these massive forces are used not only to
hoodwink the public about the rape figures - and, indeed, about most of the other figures to do
with matters of 'abuse' - they are also used as some of kind of justification to demonise men, to hurt them, to
discriminate against them, to push them through outrageously unjust legal
processes which have been corrupted through and through, and to make it possible
for women to destroy their lives completely for no other reason than that they
wish to.
One example of the deceptions commonly employed
when it comes to the figures for 'rape' that are touted by most western
governments is their purposeful inflation by something of the order of 2000%.
This is done by including all allegations of rape in the rape
figures - despite the fact that the vast majority of these allegations will be
judged to be false. And these figures are then compounded even further by a
factor of anywhere between 4 and 20 in order to account for the number of women
who, allegedly, failed to report their rapes.
And what must surely be one of the most
unconscionable and most malicious of deceits perpetrated by western governments,
feminists and women's groups during the past two decades is their fairly-well
hidden assumption - exhibited in all their figures and all
their public rhetoric - that unproved allegations of rape are, in
fact, real rapes!
This is what they call them.
In the UK, for example, only some 5% of
allegations result in convictions. In other words, when the police and the lawyers
and the doctors and the juries have done all the investigating that they possibly can, the result is that some 95% of cases are judged NOT GUILTY or NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE.
So where, exactly, is the valid evidence to suggest that these 95% of women have,
in fact, been raped?
Well, there is no such evidence! These 'rapes'
are simply manufactured out of very thin air by various groups that, in essence,
promote male hatred in order to reap some kind of benefit for themselves.
Finally, please note that (given the
commonly-accepted preponderance of unreported rapes; i.e. 3 out of 4) even if men were four times as
likely to rape women as women were to make false allegations of rape, it would still
be the case that 50% of rape allegations made to the police would be false.
(Also see my piece entitled Most Rape Allegations Are False.)
|
