Why Governments Love Feminism
(Click)

Stop LYING Harman Harriet Harman was ordered to stop misleading the public about rape by an official inquiry report yesterday. In brief; Harriet Harman has been told by Baroness Stern to stop misleading the public with her phony rape statistics. The conviction rate for 'rape' is about 60% - not about 6%; which is what the lying Harriet Harman and her lying crony, Vera Baird, have kept saying over the years. Baroness Stern's concern is that by telling the public that the conviction rate is only 6%, genuine victims of rape will be put off from going to the police - because they will believe that there is little chance of conviction. And, of course, Baroness Stern is right. And Harriet Harman is clearly well aware that her promulgation of the 6% conviction rate will discourage genuine rape victims from coming forward. So, why has Harriet Harman been doing this? Surely, she is concerned to encourage genuine victims to come forward? Surely, she is also concerned to demonstrate that her government's courts are, in fact, doing quite well when it comes to convicting rapists who are actually brought before them? So, why has Harriet Harman been deceiving the public for all these years? It doesn't make sense, does it? Oh yes it does - because, as I keep telling you, Harriet Harman has no concern for genuine rape victims. Her only concern is to garner the votes of women by stirring up hatred towards men. And by forever proclaiming that 95% of rapists get away with their crimes, she manages to stir up this hatred in millions of women. Finally, Baroness Stern's view that up to 10% of rape allegations might be false is nothing but baloney. The false allegation figure is much closer to 90% than it is to 10%. There is no valid evidence WHATSOEVER to suggest that the false allegation rate is close to 10%, but there is PLENTY of evidence to suggest that it is close to 90%. In the UK, women seem nowadays to allege rape at the drop of a hat - especially when drunk or stoned. Ho Hum. Never mind. We do, finally, make some progress. So, keep at it, Boys! Let's drum these loathsome man-hating, sh#t-stirring  feminists like Harriet Harman and her horrible friends into the dark oblivion where they undoubtedly belong. END NOTE: I have no idea how many women are raped in the UK, and I have no idea how many rape victims do not come forward. Nor has anybody else got any idea that is not based on pure speculation. But when it comes to those women who turn up at the police station, the evidence strongly suggests that the vast majority are making false claims. END NOTE 2: On Channel 4 TV this evening, a female police officer whose identity was kept hidden, and who proclaimed herself to be a feminist, said that she, herself, would think twice before going to the police to report a rape. I quote, ... "I would have a lot of trouble reporting it [a rape] and I'm a serving police officer. I'm a feminist. I'm a blogger. I'm an independent-thinking woman.  And I would be in two minds whether to report it [a rape] because of the grief it causes. And just the hassle of it, knowing the questions that are going to be put to you, and thinking, "Are you going to be getting anything out of it?" I've had seasoned detectives tell me that they think that the majority of allegations they've dealt with are false. And this is based on nothing more than the fact that they couldn't get enough evidence for a conviction." So, there you have it. 1. Seasoned detectives believe that the majority of rape allegations are false. 2. This anonymous feminist policewoman thinks that these seasoned detectives are basing their conclusions solely on the basis of the fact that they cannot find enough evidence for conviction; i.e. she believes that these seasoned detectives (which will consist of both men and women detectives) are too stupid to differentiate between 'not finding enough evidence for a conviction' and a false allegation. But the main point to be made here is this. The 'seasoned detectives' whom she criticises clearly agree with my point of view. The false allegation rate is closer to 90% than it is to 10%. END NOTE 3: Here are two posts by police officers on this policewoman's blog, ... "A colleague of mine spent a weekend attached to a sexual offences unit, took three allegations, and was able to prove categorically in EVERY case that the victim was either lying or being seriously economical with the truth." ... "Some of the greatest cynics I have spoken to are the SOLO officers [Sexual Offences Liason Officers] that are the initial investigaters in these matters. These are nearly always female officers with many years experience. The reason is that the majority of allegations they deal with are fabrications and that they spend alot of time and effort for nothing."

False Accuser Put Three Boys In Prison A 16-year-old girl, whose allegation that she was raped at Fredericia train station resulted in the conviction of three teenage boys, unknowingly confessed on a hidden camera that she lied about the incident, Does anyone out there still think that the justice system is anything other than completely corrupt? Three boys sent to prison solely on the grounds that they were accused by a female. And what do these types of incident reveal about those officials working within the justice system? Surely, the only conclusion that you can reach is that they are thoroughly despicable human beings; e.g. see my piece, Kevin Driscoll Is Innocent. People who persistently and knowingly cause serious harm to innocent others through the systems that they operate are scum as far as I am concerned. And, take it from me, the officials involved in these cases know damn well that men are going to prison, long term, purely on the basis of accusations. Worse still, they actually spend much of their time touting for business by encouraging females to make false accusations by offering them numerous incentives to do so. And they know full well that accusations alone will do. Tell me. Would YOU send to prison for many years three young men simply on the basis of an accusation by one female? No? Then you stand many miles higher than all those judges, lawyers and police officers who do such things to people. They really, really are scum in my view. I have nothing but contempt for them. Indeed, in my view, they are actually lower than false rape accusers. Much lower. At least these female liars mostly only destroy the lives of a single man. But these officials treat men by the thousand as if they were guilty, and they also knowingly prosecute thousands of men - hoping to gain convictions - simply on the basis of some uncorroborated female testimony. And this, they do, knowing full well that many innocent men will be convicted, and that even those who are not convicted will be seriously harmed by what they are doing. Thousands of men. Not just one or two. Well, I am not prepared to let them off the hook for the evil that they willingly do. And neither should you. It should sicken you all to see what nightmares innocent men are being put through by these wicked self-serving officials; simply because some female - most often lying, according to the best evidence available - has made some kind of complaint; usually out of spite, and/or to get sympathy, and/or to account for her own poor behaviour - but always, of course, to gain some kind of advantage for herself. As columnist Carole Sarler put it, there is a sinister collusion going on between false accusers and government officials - both of who profit themselves by getting men prosecuted for rape. And let me repeat; these officials do not care how many men they put through the mill. The more, the better, as far as they are concerned. We know that this is the case; e.g. see AH's Good Chance Of Conviction? We also know that they are quite prepared to ruin a man's life simply following an accusation! We know that they are forever encouraging women to make such accusations. We KNOW, therefore, that when it comes to seriously harming innocent men, ... .... The more, the better, as far as they are concerned. Think very carefully about that - because it is both true and despicable. Oh yes, they're scumbags all right.