Stop LYING Harman
Harriet Harman was ordered to stop misleading the public about rape by an
official inquiry report yesterday.
In brief; Harriet Harman has been told by Baroness Stern to stop
misleading the public with her phony rape statistics.
The conviction rate for 'rape' is about 60% - not about 6%; which is
what the lying Harriet Harman and her lying crony, Vera Baird, have kept
saying over the years.
(In the UK, the quoted 'conviction rate' for all crimes -
except for rape - is deemed to be the
percentage of convictions achieved out of all the cases that
went to court. For rape, however, the
quoted conviction rate is deemed to be the percentage of all
allegations that have been made -
which is where the 6% comes from.)
Baroness Stern's concern is that by telling the public that the
conviction rate is only 6%, genuine victims of rape will be put off from
going to the police - because they will believe that there is little
chance of conviction.
And, of course, Baroness Stern is right.
And Harriet Harman is clearly well aware that her promulgation of the
6% conviction rate will discourage genuine rape victims from coming
So, why has Harriet Harman been doing this? Surely, she is concerned to
encourage genuine victims to come forward? Surely, she is also concerned
to demonstrate that her government's courts are, in fact, doing quite well
when it comes to convicting rapists who are actually brought before them?
why has Harriet Harman been deceiving the public for
all these years?
So, why has Harriet Harman been deceiving the public for all these
What does she gain by claiming that the conviction rate for rape is
After all, by doing this, she is discouraging rape victims from coming
forward, and she is also implying that her very own judges and legal staff
It doesn't make sense, does it?
Oh yes it does - because, as I keep telling you, Harriet Harman has no
genuine concern for rape victims or for her own staff. Her only concern is to garner the votes
of women by stirring up hatred towards men.
And by forever proclaiming
that 95% of rapists get away with their crimes, she manages to stir up
this hatred in millions of women.
Politicians and government officials like Harriet Harman believe
(quite rightly) that they have more to gain by stirring up hatred towards
men than they have by admitting that their conviction rate for rape is, in
fact, quite good.
In Harriet Harman's case, the dishonesty surrounding this issue is also
designed to outrage women sufficiently for them to support even further
corruptions of the justice system when it comes to rape allegations and,
of course, to give their votes and their support to her.
Finally, Baroness Stern's view that up to 10% of rape allegations might
be false is nothing but baloney.
The false allegation figure is much closer to 90% than it is to 10%.
There is no valid evidence WHATSOEVER to suggest that the false
allegation rate is close to 10%, but there is PLENTY of evidence to
suggest that it is close to 90%.
In the UK, women seem nowadays to allege rape at the drop of a hat -
especially when drunk or stoned.
END NOTE: I have no idea how many women are raped in the UK, and I have
no idea how many rape victims do not come forward. Nor has anybody else
got any idea that is not based on pure speculation.
But when it comes to those women who turn up at the police station, the
evidence strongly suggests that the
vast majority are making false
END NOTE 2: On Channel 4 TV this evening, a female police officer whose
identity was kept hidden, and who proclaimed herself to be a feminist,
said that she, herself, would think twice before going to the police to
report a rape. I quote, ...
"I would have a lot of trouble reporting it [a rape] and I'm a
serving police officer. I'm a feminist. I'm a blogger. I'm an
independent-thinking woman. And I would be in two minds whether to
report it [a rape] because of the grief it causes. And just the hassle of
it, knowing the questions that are going to be put to you, and thinking,
"Are you going to be getting anything out of it?" I've had seasoned
detectives tell me that they think that the majority of allegations
they've dealt with are false. And this is based on nothing more than the
fact that they couldn't get enough evidence for a conviction."
So, there you have it.
Seasoned detectives believe that the majority of rape
allegations are false.
1. Seasoned detectives believe that the majority of rape allegations
2. This anonymous feminist policewoman thinks that these seasoned
detectives are basing their conclusions solely on the basis of the fact
that they cannot find enough evidence for conviction; i.e. she believes
that these seasoned detectives (which will consist of both men and women
detectives) are too stupid to differentiate between 'not finding enough
evidence for a conviction' and a false allegation.
But the main point to be made here is this.
The 'seasoned detectives' whom she criticises clearly agree with my
point of view.
The false allegation rate is closer to 90% than it is to 10%.
END NOTE 3: Here are two posts by police officers on this policewoman's
"A colleague of mine spent a weekend attached to a sexual offences
unit, took three allegations, and was able to prove categorically in EVERY
case that the victim was either lying or being seriously economical with
"Some of the greatest cynics I have spoken to are the SOLO officers
[Sexual Offences Liason Officers] that are the initial investigaters in
these matters. These are nearly always female officers with many years
experience. The reason is that the majority of allegations they deal with
are fabrications and that they spend alot of time and effort for nothing."