Angry Harry
Blog
 Page3
Your Emails

 

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

Fathers Groups Miss The Big Picture

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

A Permanent Gender War?

Rape Baloney

                               

80% of 'sex offenders' innocent? ...

Hello Harry

One thing has been bugging for a couple of weeks now. It is this statement from your piece The Truth About the Truth 

(And in the UK, for example, my own view is that something like 80% of all those men convicted of sexual crimes are either completely innocent, or their behaviour has been 'misjudged'.)

Where do you get this figure of 80%? Is it an official figure? Has some academic quoted this in research?

Please let me know before my mind bursts.

Regards

F (a long time fan)

Hello F

Well, actually, I conjured the figure out of my head - but I did say that this 80% figure was my view.

And I will tell you why I think that it is about right.

1. Those **imprisoned** for sex offences in the UK (guilty and innocent) tend to claim that at least half of their fellow inmates were not guilty of anything. And I believe them. Furthermore, I think that this 50% is probably a bottom line.

2. Many men are, indeed, guilty of what they were convicted for but, nevertheless, their behaviours, in my view, will have very often been misjudged. One good example of this is those men who have been found guilty of 'raping' underage girls when, in fact, they were their boyfriends. I quote the prison doctor Theodore Dalrymple ...

"In my experience from the prison in which I work, men who are charged with having sexual relations with underage adolescent girls are often reported to the police (and subsequently charged and imprisoned) not because they have had sex with these girls, but because they have stopped having sex with these girls: and hell hath no fury like an adolescent girl scorned."

Another example would be that postman who was charged with 'sexual assault and battery' merely for planting a kiss on a customer's cheek.

These men were not guilty of sexual assaults. Inappropriate conduct, maybe; but not sexual assaults.

3. We **know** that many law enforcement officers will attempt to prosecute - often successfully - men whom they even know to be innocent e.g. the Duke Three in the USA, and Warren Blackwell here in the UK. This not only suggests to me that many innocent men are prosecuted for the most disgusting of reasons, but it also suggests to me that there are not enough real bona fide sexual offenders to prosecute.

4. Men are often convicted without **any** objective evidence standing against them; just the testimony of a vengeful lying woman.

5. I am almost certain that AT LEAST 85% of sex-assault **allegations** made to the police are false, and I actually believe the figure is over 90%; e.g. see Rape Baloney.

6. I do not believe that **viewing** illicit material is a 'sexual' offence (any more than viewing a picture of a bomb explosion is a 'violent' offence) though I do accept that certain material should be illegal to view.

7. Men who are imprisoned for sexual offences can have their sentences halved if, once in prison, they admit to their guilt, and many men are very seriously threatened by the police if they do not admit to their guilt when it comes to sexual offences. As such, many men who do admit to their guilt in this area are not guilty at all.

All in all, therefore, my guess is that around 80% of men who have been convicted of ****sexual**** crimes are either innocent of such **sexual** crimes and/or their behaviours have either been misjudged or dishonestly 'categorised'; and, with regard to the latter, many 'sexual' harassment cases also come to mind.

In a nutshell; two things seem to be happening. 

Firstly, crimes are very often deemed to be sexual when, in fact, there was no real crime and/or when there was, in fact, no actual sex - of any sort!

Secondly, the justice system has been corrupted through and through with feminist-inspired man-hating ideology. The system is completely untrustworthy when it comes to 'relationship' issues. And it is absolutely clear that prosecutors, politicians and government officials are forever bending over backwards to convict as many men as possible regardless of the evidence and, indeed, regardless of the truth about the alleged impact on the alleged victims.

And one can add to all this the fact that in the vast majority of these cases, whatever it was that was actually done - if anything - would have been trivial; because, as in most other areas of human behaviour, extreme things happen relatively rarely. In other words, most of this sexual stuff is nothing more than froth and bubble. But, as typically happens nowadays, the feminists and the abuse industry pump everything up, so that everything to do with the 'abuse of women' sounds a hundred times worse than it actually is.

An attempted kiss is 'sexual battery'!

But this is the bread and butter of the sex assault industry. It is where most of the court cases come from. But, of course, they do not hit the headlines - even though they ruin lives.

And when you push into your consciousness this huge - and largely hidden - number of cases that are trivial, miscategorised or misjudged, and stop focussing on the big cases that hit the headlines, it is not very difficult to believe that very many men are being entrapped by a corrupt system that is actually **designed** to entrap them - with, further, huge encouragements being given to women to make false allegations, and for men to admit to things that they have not actually done. 

In summary; it seems highly plausible to me that 80% of those men who are officially pronounced to be guilty of sexual crimes are not, in any reasonable sense of the term, 'sex offenders'.

Finally, one thing that also strikes me about the majority of men who have been convicted for breaking sexual laws of one form or another is the fact that they clearly had no intention to cause anyone any harm. On the contrary, they were mostly hoping to achieve the opposite. And, in my view, this makes hell of a difference to how they should be viewed. Unfortunately, however, the truth behind such issues is completely swamped by the huge forces that are forever seeking to demonise men.

Best wishes 

Harry

(Also see Kissing Is 'Battery')

 

When women were 'oppressed' ...








click a picture

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.