20/1/01

Benny Hill

I was watching one of the Comedy Channels a few nights ago and saw that Benny Hill was back on the air. And it reminded me of the first time - back in the '70s - when I realised that feminists had deep-rooted psychological problems concerning men. 

Freud had said something about Penis Envy.

In the case of feminists, I think he might have had a valid point!

Feminists were overtly and very publicly appalled at the way Benny Hill portrayed women in his shows. (These women were usually young, gorgeous, nubile, very scantily dressed - for those times - and, in the skits, they were always lusted after by Benny Hill himself - but always in the most complimentary of ways.)

Benny Hill adored women! He worshipped them. This was absolutely clear from the way he venerated them constantly. 

He was excited by them. He was moved by them.

But feminists could not see this. They said that he was misogynistic (that he actually hated women!) and that women were degraded by him.

And so he was taken off the air in the UK for a long time. 

But the Benny Hill Show was just comedy - plain and simple. It was no more portraying women in a misogynistic light than were, in fact, hundreds of programmes portraying men in a far worse manner.

The Benny Hill Show was just a gentle, light-hearted romp, starring a man who liked being silly to make people laugh. He was the Mr Bean who liked to chase young women.

Benny Hill was attacked by feminists not because he was insulting women, and not because his programmes demeaned them. He elevated women, certain women, to the top of the ladder. He put them on pedestals. He groveled before them.

The reason that feminists didn't like The Benny Hill Show was because they didn't like the women in it. Take it from me, feminists love to make men grovel, but they don't like men to grovel toward women who aren't feminists. Only feminist women must be put on pedestals. Other women, oh no, the feminists can't stand them. And they do not want men to hold such women in such high esteem.

And this was the real reason for their hostility toward him. It had nothing to do with the 'demeaning of women'. It had everything to do with the fact that the Benny Hill Show portrayed non-feminist women in an adorable light.

Their continuing bitterness at their own obvious lack of attractiveness when it comes to men is the engine behind the corruptions to our justice system (the perverse sex-assault laws, the child custody practices, domestic violence procedures etc), as well as the feminist media onslaught against the entire male gender. This bitterness also fuels the hatred of men indirectly, through, for example, such things as the whipping up of child abuse hysteria (particularly against fathers)

Feminists are perpetually enraged by the fact that men don't find them attractive, and they are irritated in the extreme to discover that, even after 30 years of their dishonest propaganda, real women don't like them either! 

The very nature of their hateful outpourings (often to do with belittling the penis) reveals the depths of hatred that they, themselves, feel toward males.

Yet they would like males to grovel before them. 

And this is clearly one of their strongest yearnings.

But herein lies their real problem, because men still don't grovel before them.

And they never will.

The attitudes of men toward the women they sexually desire or 'fancy' is very positive indeed. They do not look down upon such women. They look up to them.

And when it came to the Benny Hill Show, the audience figures were constantly amazing - not only in this country, but across the world.

And so this programme was a real blow to feminists, because the women who were being adored were the complete antithesis to what feminists aspired to be.

So they lied about it all, and they set out to destroy it.

They hurled the ludicrous accusation that Benny Hill hated women, and that he was promoting a hatred of women - misogyny - to everyone else.

But, as must be obvious to anyone who has seen his shows, the idea that Benny Hill didn't like women has to be one of the most ridiculous, nonsensical, vindictive and spiteful notions spun in the cause of feminism.

It was said by at least one of Benny Hill's closest friends that his sexual inclinations (and with some of his showgirls, I believe) included, - and I put this delicately - a curious nasal attraction for certain items of women's worn clothing! And similar such pursuits.

This surely represents the utmost in adoration.

Indeed, recent research on the emotion of 'disgust' reveals that it is dampened considerably, and often 'reversed', the more you 'love' someone. 

When you love your baby, even its bum smells sweet. 

Well, at the very least, the bums of other babies smell a lot worse!

But feminists cannot conceive of this sort of thing in relation to a man - or in relation to anyone else for that matter. It has never 'happened' to them. They are complete failures when it comes to men and close, loving relationships. And they don't understand them. So, they cannot understand, therefore, how it is that Benny Hill's portrayal of women was not misogynistic.

It enrages feminists to be confronted with the fact that the women whom men lust after are the ones they elevate, and appreciate - as women. Feminists do not want such women to have this 'privilege'.

It infuriates them that the Page 3 girl is truly desired and admired while they, themselves, with their feminist 'traits', go unnoticed, and are now even reviled.

And so, with real vindictiveness, they spread widely, and successfully, the poisonous propaganda that when men looked longingly at such 'gorgeous' women, they were, in fact, looking down upon them. 

They weren't.

It is, and was, a typical feminist lie.

Men adore feminine women - pretty much regardless of how they look. Period. And, despite thirty long years, the feminist attempts to 'blot out' real women, and their femininity (no matter how old, or how fat, or how conventionally-unattractive they are) just hasn't worked. 

Benny Hill's programmes are still being broadcast worldwide. Page 3 lives on. The women's magazines are choc-a-bloc with sensual images of feminine women. Women themselves, young and old, have never, in recent history, been able to expose themselves so provocatively and so freely without being admonished by society at large. And the images that feminists detest so deeply have increased a thousand fold in the past three decades.

And all this induces a rage within feminists  because they have failed so completely in this respect. 

A leading feminist journalist in this country not long ago said, "Men are only useful for sex and for fixing things around the house."

Well, as far as feminists are concerned, she's just about right, because men have no inclination to offer feminist women anything else.

Trisha, the one whose TV chat programme has, in my view, probably done more to damage UK men than any other e.g. see AH's Why Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to have a Baby? 

As I have often said, the feminist women who continually fuel the hate-stirring propaganda against men are, well, let's just say, not normal.

And from this article it would appear that "Trisha" fits the bill rather well.

After all, who is the common denominator when it comes to all the disharmony and 'abuse' in her life, eh?

She is!

24/06/02

Hello T

If you look at the leading American feminists of the 70's you will discover that they were mostly very unattractive women who were emotionally retarded - or they were lesbian. And they often exhibited a deep psychological hatred of men. 

These feminists were not normal women in the psychological sense.

And even in the case of our very own and relatively pleasant Germaine Greer, for example, her younger life exhibits a catalogue of abnormality.

She was decidedly promiscuous (at a time when female promiscuity was rare) and yet used a condom only ONCE - through her own choice. She then went on to have MANY abortions - none of which particularly bothered her. She had a bad relationship with her father and abandoned her own country and her relatives at a young age. She claimed that she was raped at a party - and the young man whom she accused went to prison. Her one and only marriage lasted less than a month. She posed 'openly' for a pornographic magazine and tried to become a publisher of pornography - an enterprise that failed to take off. Her intimate relationships with men have all been a disaster. She was extremely clever in many areas that required considerable intellectual endeavour.

There was little that was 'normal' about this woman.

The feminists of the 70s were about as unrepresentative of normal women as the white supremacists in the KKK were of normal men.

And here is a short piece about another of the leading feminists - and a seemingly inveterate liar - Betty Friedan, entitled Feminism's Dirty Secret - by David Horowitz. 

AH

15/7/00

Taken from Joan Bakewell's My Generation on BBC 2. 

John Peel: [In those days, as a young man] I just went at it [sex] like a bull at a gate. That's all I thought about. Getting my end away. Germaine Greer taught me a valuable lesson about that - and made me think about that aspect of it.

Joan Bakewell: What was the lesson?

John Peel: Well, I knew her as a friend. She was someone that I liked and admired. I found her most entertaining. And she decided to do, to me, and to other men, what men traditionally did to women, in that they would presume on their friendship and simply push it a step too far. I actually found myself saying that, actually, I like you too much, Germaine. I don't want to do this. And, really, she just made me, really. It was a very valuable lesson. I thought, yes, Oh sh*t, So that's what it's like.

i.e. Ms Greer bullied him into having sex.

Andrea Dworkin 

Read her story about her second rape when she was 52

Well, if Andrea Dworkin was, indeed, raped, then she surely deserves our sympathy.

But, for example, Camille Paglia does not seem to be convinced that she was, in fact, raped ...

Dworkin…has turned a garish history of mental instability into feminist grand opera. She publicly boasts of her bizarre multiple rapes, assaults, beatings, breakdowns and tacky trauma, as if her inability to cope with life were the patriarchy's fault rather than her own. Dworkin's shrill, kvetching, solipsistic prose has a sloppy, squalling infantilism. Camille Paglia