Carmel Napier

Lying Is Acceptable Say Police

More Home Office Lies Exposed Do brutal attacks on women by their husbands or boyfriends surge during the World Cup? According to a May 25 press release by England’s Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), “cases of domestic abuse increase by nearly 30% on England match days.” Prof Christina Hoff Sommers

Professor Sheila Bird ... found it [the Home Office Study] to be so amateurish and riddled with flaws that it could not be taken seriously.

Never, ever, ever believe any of the 'abuse' figures emanating from the UK's Home Office or ACPO (The Association of Chief Police Officers). They always do their very best to drum up as much abuse hysteria as possible in order to maintain their cosy empires and their huge pensions.

When the BBC investigators presented Carmel Napier, the deputy chief constable of Gwent, with the evidence that the study she and her colleagues were promoting was specious, she replied: “If it has saved lives, then it is worth it.”

This emotionally-inflammatory empty-headed remark from a feminist is a typical example of how the abuse industry operates. It is a remark that is made in order to stun people into silence so that they no longer question the dogma.

And, as a tactic, it works extremely well.

After all, people do not want to come across as uncaring towards women.

Whenever I hear such a remark in the real world I often reply as follows, "Hmm, yes - which is why I think that women should be completely covered up whenever they leave the house."

I pause.

At this point, people look at me as if I'm mad. "What on earth has this got to do with anything?" they think.

"After all," I then continue; "if this saves just one woman from being raped, then it's worth it, isn't it?"

...............................

Of course, women would never accept that they should all cover up so that, perhaps, one rape could be avoided.

men are expected to put up with all sorts of curtailments and restrictions

But men are expected to put up with all sorts of curtailments and restrictions on their rights and their liberties on the basis of the fact that such curtailments and restrictions might prevent something bad from happening to a woman or a child.

Indeed, this notion that men - all men - can be treated unfairly - sometimes atrociously - in order to reduce the probability of something bad happening to a woman or a child has been used time and time again as a major justification for prejudicing against men all our laws to do with relationships.

But the idea that women should somehow be restricted in order to prevent something bad from happening to themselves - or, indeed, to anybody else - is never discussed or entertained.

Women must be left completely free and untouchable to do as they please.

And in the case above, we see a very senior female police officer, Carmel Napier, admit to being quite happy to promote false statistics in order to demonise men in order to, allegedly, save lives.

So. Please get this into your head.

This VERY SENIOR police officer is ADMITTING that she is HAPPY for LIES which DEMONISE MEN to be PROMOTED in order to maintain her campaign against domestic violence.

And so when you read some of my articles which reveal just how malicious and dishonest are so many senior government officials when it comes to 'gender issues', perhaps you will more likely realise that I am not exaggerating.

Indeed, they are lying through their teeth on virtually every issue that I have investigated - with serious consequences for men.

But can you imagine what would happen if a senior male police officer said that he was quite happy to see being promulgated false and elevated statistics about the rates of female crime?

He would be fired within the day.

Finally, I know that many of you will find this difficult to believe - presumably, because you are honest souls - but the truth of the matter is this.

The left - and particularly the feminists and the politically-corrected - mostly believe that it is perfectly acceptable to lie all the time; because, in essence, the truth, and the consequences for others, are far less important to them than is achieving their own aims - which, for the most part, are decidedly self-serving and self-enriching.

it is not just feminist police officers who lie all the time

Thus, it is not just feminist police officers who lie all the time, but also feminist academics, politicians, journalists, columnists, judges etc etc etc.

And they continue to get away with it.

Oh well, I suppose, if it saves just one woman from domestic violence, then it's worth it, isn't it?

But what, exactly, is the 'it' that is, allegedly, 'worth it'?

What, exactly, is being sacrificed in order to save 'just one woman from' something or other?

And the answer is 'absolutely nothing' - unless you happen to be a man; in which case, not only will you have to put up with all the totally unwarranted demonisation of you that will be shunted out all over the land and into the minds of just about everyone - including your loved ones - through posters, TV adverts and 'news' items, but you will also have to put up with all the suspicion and the anti-male laws and policies that usually follow from all this.

And these will all be drummed up on the basis of the LIES (and, hence, the hatred towards men) that people like Carmel Napier are happy to promote.

Finally, it seems to me that if senior police officers and other government officials are quite happy for men to be demonised and for LIES to be spread about them, then men should feel quite entitled to do the same to them - in retaliation.

Also see, ...

Stop Lying Harman

(Harriet Harman was told by senior government officials to stop lying about the rape figures.)