BNP leader Nick Griffin and controversial historian David Irving were
invited to talk about free speech.
Watching the aggression of those Oxford
students protesting last night was deeply embarrassing. So much for their
'liberal' attitudes, eh? They were actually trying to use aggression and
intimidation to close down a debate on the Limits of Free Speech!
Shame on them.
And this was not a debate on
immigration. It was a debate on free speech!
Furthermore, I simply cannot understand how
these ignorant bigots continually manage to get away with calling themselves
And last week, I actually saw an Oxford
University professor talking about his belief that having 'open borders' in the
UK would be beneficial for the country; with one Labour MP endorsing his view
and also saying that the current wave of immigration brings in more taxes rather
than incurring more expenditure!
Well, if all this immigration is bringing us
so many economic benefits and so much money in taxes, then why are our tax rates
increasing rather than decreasing, eh? Surely, all this extra money should reduce
our tax rates!?
Of course, the truth is that immigration
will, indeed, bring some extra money in taxes, but it will also
incur much more government expenditure - which is great for those
The government is like
a landlord trying to squeeze as many tenants as possible into his property
The government is like a landlord trying to
squeeze as many tenants as possible into his property so that he can charge more
rent. Great for the landlord, but not so good for the tenants!
And, of course, by packing as many immigrants
into a country as possible, left-wing governments hope to benefit from all their
extra votes - and, of course, from all the extra 'disharmony' it causes - and
'disharmony' is what left-wing governments thrive upon - e.g. see The Governing Elite.
To hell with the natives!
And as for this "freedom of
movement" and "open borders" policy being a great idea -
according to this nincompoop of an Oxford professor - then why does he not go
the whole hog and suggest that the British Government tour the world and invite millions
of people into the country?
How's about 500 million from China?
Well, why not?
500 million immigrants from
China would be a real boon to our economy?
Surely - according to the aforementioned
nincompoop - 500 million immigrants from China would be a real boon to our
Of course there must be limits to
And, of course, if people did have complete
freedom of movement, and all our countries had "open borders", then
what would happen is that people from all around the world would pour
unrestrainedly into all those areas that seemed like good places to live, until
such time that these places were so over-crowded and deficient that they were no
longer any better than anywhere else.
The whole idea of open borders and
unrestrained immigration is utterly ridiculous - at least, at this point in
It would lead to a great deal of chaos and a
huge amount of unhappiness.
Hmm. An interesting case! - because the
western liberal media's outrage over this incident demonstrates just how
bankrupt are the ideas and notions of the so-called 'liberals' and how blatantly
hypocritical and ignorant they are.
They are protesting wildly because this
woman teacher was convicted for naming a teddy bear Mohammed, and yet these very same 'liberals' have
created - and continue to endorse - a society in the west wherein people are persecuted for
doing no different to what this woman teacher has done!
And imagine, for example, that the above two
monkeys on a classroom poster were named "Mandela" and "Martin
Luther" by some school teacher in the UK.
Not only would there be a
carefully-manufactured 'liberal' outcry over this, but I have little doubt that
six police officers would also turn up to investigate the matter.
So, in principle, how would
this be any different from what has been going on in Sudan over this teddy bear
In other words, what is the difference
between the woman teacher who named a teddy bear Mohammed - the woman whom
these liberals would defend - and a woman teacher who names a monkey
Mandela - whom the liberals would accuse of racism?
And is it not the case that it is only the feelings
of the offended parties that nowadays count for much here in the west? - thanks
to the empty-headedness of the 'liberal' lobby.
And so how can 'liberals' become so upset
over this teddy bear incident given that the feelings of many
Muslims have been offended by it?
Well, I'll tell you.
The answer is that those people who
masquerade as 'liberals' - such as the Oxford University protestors - are not
liberals at all.
They are bigots and they are thugs.
They are bigots and they are thugs.
They do not believe in free speech at
all - unless the speech happens to support their own agenda - and they
are completely unconcerned about people's feelings - unless these people happen
to be from privileged groups that support their agenda.
And given that religious, Sudanese Muslims do
not support the agenda of the so-called western 'liberals', then their feelings
can go to Hell!
Why Fear Multiculturalism?
Why are the English so afraid of multiculturalism when, in fact, only some 10%
of England's population are foreigners, eh?
Well, the reason for this fear, we are told by liberal 'professors', is
because the English must be racist. After all, 10% of the population can hardly
be anything to worry about, can it?
So, it must be racism that causes the English to fear so much immigration.
And yet, at the very same time, these unbelievably ignorant 'liberals', will
also claim that multiculturalism significantly enhances a society.
Well, how can it possibly be that this minority of 10% has the power to
enhance a society but it does not have the power to debase it?
It makes no sense at all, does it?
Furthermore, this ridiculously over-simplistic type of thinking can be
exposed very easily by taking a look at 'organisms'.
Organisms - such as humans - can be completely debilitated or destroyed by
the tiniest number of alien bodies - an absolutely miniscule number when
compared to the number of components that make up the organisms themselves.
A few thousand bacterial cells or viruses can completely destroy an organism
composed of trillions of cells. A tiny amount of arsenic can kill an elephant.
cultures are also 'organisms'.
And cultures are also 'organisms'.
As such, the notion that they are safe from debilitation or destruction
simply because 'only' 10% of their populations are foreigners is nothing less
than the usual hokum espoused by the almost unbelievably ignorant leftists who
deceitfully masquerade as 'liberal intellectuals'.
Goodness me. Even average 9 year olds can grasp the idea that a tiny teensy
dose of something can cause positively devastating effects.
Furthermore, in many parts of the country, the foreign elements and cultures
now constitute 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%+ of the population. And so the
'liberal' propaganda that claims that only some 10% of the population is alien
to the indigenous population is nothing more than an example of their customary
Whole areas of the UK are being taken over by people and cultures that are
foreign to the indigenous people. The latter find this threatening and alarming;
particularly as their neighbours and their relations are gradually forced out of
the areas leaving them more and more isolated.
Their feelings about all this is not 'racism'. It is a general unhappiness at
the way in which their neighbourhoods and their country is being handed over to
others, with themselves being pushed out of what they consider to be their homes
- and have done for centuries.
Notice also that the 'liberals' do not accuse the foreign populations of
being 'racist' when they choose to live amongst their own kind, but when it
comes to the indigenous population, the very same desire is said by them to
reflect a deep underlying 'racism'.
They are some of the most ignorant bigots that dwell
But, as is all too evident, these left-wing 'liberals' are not liberal at
all. They are some of the most ignorant bigots that dwell amongst us.