18/07/04

Some BBC Propaganda Tricks

Science In Schools If we want to get girls more interested in science and technology, we must move away from purveying the 'space and techie' stereotype.

The above article is little more than a piece of propaganda by the BBC, but it is interesting to see how the politically-corrected left-wing feminised 'agenda' is sneakily foisted on to the public by focusing on the apparent desires of 'children' - with the added ludicrous implication that children should influence the course of science.

For example, ...

Two-thirds [of the children] wanted more money spent on making "environmentally friendly products", while 43% called for more investment in research into genetically modified food.

... but, whence, exactly, did the children get such ideas?

Well, of course, they absorbed them mostly from what goes on in their schools and from the trash that they typically get from the feminist-dominated media such as the BBC.

Left-wing politically-corrected feminised schooling -> -> children's views about science -> -> various bodies such as the BBC promoting left-wing politically-corrected feminised ideas about science and claiming that it is the children themselves who are behind it!

And, of course, the idea behind the proposal that 'we must move away from purveying the 'space and techie' stereotype' is to make science more interesting for girls and less interesting for boys. But, again, this idea is sneaked in under the guise that it is the children themselves who actually want such a thing. 

In other words, the children are being manipulated and then used as political pawns.

And there's nothing new there!

....

Homelessness Thousands of people are being driven into homelessness by a combination of unemployment, rocketing house prices and complex benefit systems.

The BBC forgot to mention that immigration has made a significant contribution to all of the above problems.

And it also forgot to mention that 80% of homeless people are men.

It did, however, manage to bring domestic violence into the article.

Against a woman, of course.

And, indeed, while thousands of people like the above remain homeless, the BBC also forgot to mention that ...

+ The government is paying to keep 25,000 homes empty for non-existent asylum-seekers, enough to house the population of Taunton or Ashford, a confidential Downing Street memo reveals.

...

Rape Laws Unjust Judges have attacked government reforms aimed at preventing rape victims being questioned in court over their sexual history as "fundamentally flawed".

Take note of the image that the BBC has chosen to use within the body of this article - displayed on the right - despite the fact that the story is about judges claiming that the laws are unfair on the men in rape cases.

It is the men who are identified as the victims by the judges.

But it is still women that the BBC chooses to portray as the victims!

As I have often said, the BBC does not allow 'men' to be victims. They must remain hidden as best as possible.

Notice also how short is the article. There is not even a hint that this is something worth looking at too closely.

Gross injustices against men are willfully ignored by the BBC.

But if the judges were saying that women were being treated unfairly by the law, the BBC would have put the story right up in the headlines with a mass of detail to show people how poorly were women being treated.

Experts and academics would have been quoted on the matter. And they would also publish individual stories to pull at the public's heart strings.

Notice also how the above image of an alleged rape victim accompanying the article is the thing mostly likely to stick in the minds of people.

Notice also the caption to it: "Government reforms were aimed at reducing rape victims' trauma."

The message is that the nasty judges do not care about rape victims. The message is that the good feminist-controlled government was only aiming to reduce the trauma to rape victims. But this story is about judges claiming that men are treated badly by the system. It has got nothing to do with women being victims.

So what right has the BBC to try to block the public from receiving the message from the judges that men are being treated badly by the justice system?

It has no right at all.

The BBC by law is required to be impartial. It is not supposed to be an organ of deceptive feminist propaganda. And yet, once again, we see the BBC trying to bamboozle the public when it comes to revealing the truth about the appalling way in which many men are being treated. It chooses both a headline and an image to portray women as victims, even though this issue has nothing to do with women being victims. And it keeps to an absolute minimum the actual story concerning the issue of men being mistreated by the justice system.

I am not required by law to be impartial. I can be as partial as I like! But because the BBC is so large and so influential right across the world, and because British citizens are forced into providing its funding, it is, by law, required to be impartial.

But it isn't. And it hasn't been for a very long time. Indeed, the BBC has been a major promoter of male hatred for at least 20 years.

And it continues to be so.

Now, have a look at this piece by the BBC concerning the bogus gender wage gap ...

...

Wage Gap Commission Women's rights to equal pay and a fair deal in the workplace are to be championed by a new commission, the prime minister has said.

... Notice how long and detailed is the piece in comparison to the previous piece about the injustices against male defendants in sex-assault cases.

Notice also that the final paragraph contains a downright lie - allegedly made by a female politician - and that the BBC purposely ends on a note that is designed to promote male hatred. Here it is ...

Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge said it was "quite disgraceful" women were still paid less despite outperforming men in education for decades.

The truth is that even today, men are still, on average, more qualified than are women - because it was not until the 80's that younger women began to catch up with their similarly-aged male counterparts.

In other words, the older generation of working men - such as my good self - are far more qualified on average than are their similarly-aged female counterparts.

And those men who are some ten years younger than my good self - who is 52 - are considerably more qualified on average than their similarly-aged female counterparts.

Never!

Let us look at why this is the case. And concentrate carefully on the argument that follows!

For the sake of argument, just imagine for the moment that, currently, school cleaners are all women and street cleaners are all men.

The tax-funded hate stirrers at the Equal Opportunities Commission discover that school cleaners get paid less than street cleaners, and so they force, by law, school cleaners to be paid the same as street cleaners.

What will happen is this.

More men will want to become school cleaners because there is no point in them doing all the heavy work involved in street cleaning given that the pay is now the same.

The number of street cleaners will fall.

The demand for street cleaners will rise.

The pay for street cleaners will rise.

Conversely.

The number of school cleaners will rise.

The demand for school cleaners will fall.

The pay for school cleaners will fall.

And so we end up back at Square One, as men, once again, troop off to become street cleaners in order to earn more money.

In other words, there is never going to be a solution to this bogus wage gap problem. And feminists are forever going to engender male hatred over this issue in pursuit of an impossible goal.

And, of course, in the commercial world, the feminist-inspired myth that women are paid less than men for the same work is risible; because if this was true then the men would soon be booted out of their jobs and replaced by the cheaper women. Shareholders and management would hardly tolerate employing more expensive workers when cheaper ones were available. They would be committing commercial suicide if they failed to employ the 'cheaper' women while other companies rushed to do so.

Anyway. Here is just one example demonstrating why women do not climb so high in the workplace as men, statistically speaking; ...

Up to half of all single mothers do not want to work and simply will not take jobs, a report has found. 

The analysis said Labour will never achieve its goal of persuading large numbers of lone parents to abandon a life on benefits because a huge proportion of them simply refuse to do so.

And what people really need to understand is that the only underlying factor that binds feminists together in all of the issues that they make a fuss about - i.e. feminism itself - is a desire to promote male hatred.

There is no other reasonable explanation for what binds their movement together.

This hatred explains the lies, the deceits, the rhetoric, the ducking, the diving, the continuing pursuit of impossible goals, the vengeful type of women who lead the agenda, the connections between them, their backgrounds, their romantic failures, their desire to remove fathers from families, their desire to prosecute severely men for bogus and trivial events of alleged abuse, their corruption of the justice system, their loud shrieks of laughter over Bobbit jokes etc etc.

Even the biological evidence is consistent with the view that women, themselves, are often infused and heavily motivated by long-term hatreds, by permanent desires for vengeance, and by an almost unlimited capacity for selfishness.

And this is why, for example, even though our children and whole sections of our society are horrendously damaged by fatherlessness, feminists continue to pursue policies that will actually increase enormously the rates of fatherlessness.

They don't care about children. They don't care about their societies. They just want to hurt the men.

And this, of course, explains why feminists are keen to pursue an impossible goal - such as eliminating the alleged wage gap. It provides them with a never-ending basis for stirring up hatred towards men. (Also see why 'Equality' Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable.)

Furthermore, of course, the majority of these feminist women know damn well that men are far more motivated in the workplace than are women, and they know damn well that it is the choices of women that account for much of the wage gap, but, as per the BBC article above, they do not mention any of this.

In other words, they have no intention of engaging the public with any reasonable discussion concerning the wage gap.

Why?

Well. This is because their main intention, quite clearly, is to use the issue to stir up hatred towards men - not to solve the wage gap problem.

There is nothing that binds logically the various ideas contained in the rhetoric of these women - except the desire to hurt men. Their desire to promote male hatred is the core that unites them.

And if you still cannot see this, just consider for the moment that the feminist-indoctrinated politicians (e.g. as mentioned in the above BBC article) never even admit to the possibility that at least part of the wage gap is due to women's choices.

In other words, they have absolutely no intention of dealing with this issue in a way that does not demonise men.

For example, they could urge women to help close the wage gap themselves by taking their work more seriously and putting more effort into it.

Why do they not do this? - given that they know that it is women themselves who are at least partly responsible for the alleged wage gap?

Well. The answer is that they want to generate male hatred. And they do not want to mute this hatred by suggesting that women themselves might have something to do with the problem.

And when you understand that the real motivation behind the women's movement is fuelled almost purely by male hatred, then what has been going on for the past 30 years begins to make sense.

...

You still think that I am exaggerating, eh?

OK. Then have a look at this piece by Melanie Phillips entitled The BBC and Gender Fascism. It gives some insight into how the feminists at the BBC feel about men as they go about trying to destroy Valentine's Day - the day in which men and women are supposed to declare their special love for each other - by devoting hours and hours of programming to domestic violence.