Some BBC Propaganda Tricks
Rape Laws Unjust Judges
have attacked government reforms aimed at preventing rape victims being
questioned in court over their sexual history as "fundamentally
Take note of the image that the BBC has chosen to use within the body of
this article - displayed on the right - despite the fact that the story is about judges claiming that the laws are
unfair on the men in rape cases.
It is the men who are identified as the victims by the judges.
But it is still women that the BBC chooses to
portray as the victims!
As I have often said, the BBC does not allow 'men' to be victims. They must remain hidden as best as possible.
Notice also how short is the article. There is not even a hint that this is something worth looking at too closely.
Gross injustices against men are willfully ignored by the BBC.
But if the judges were saying that women were being treated
unfairly by the law, the BBC would have put the story right up in the headlines
with a mass of detail to show people how poorly were women being treated.
Experts and academics would have been quoted on the
Experts and academics would have been quoted on the matter. And they would also publish individual stories to pull at the public's heart
Notice also how the above image
of an alleged rape victim accompanying the article is the thing mostly likely to stick in the minds of
Notice also the caption to it: "Government reforms were aimed at
reducing rape victims' trauma."
The message is that the nasty judges do not care about rape
victims. The message is that the good feminist-controlled Labour government was only aiming to reduce
the trauma to rape victims. But this story is about judges claiming that men are treated badly
by the system. It has got nothing to do with women being
But, as is customary, the BBC is just trying to stop the public from
receiving the message from the judges that men are being treated badly by the
It does this kind of thing all the time.
Now, have a look at this piece by the BBC concerning the bogus gender wage gap ...
Wage Gap Commission Women's
rights to equal pay and a fair deal in the workplace are to be championed by a
new commission, the prime minister has said.
... Notice how long and detailed is the piece in comparison to the previous
piece about the injustices against male defendants in sex-assault cases.
Notice also that the final paragraph contains a downright lie - allegedly
made by a female politician - and that the BBC purposely ends on a note that is
designed to promote male hatred. Here it is ...
Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge said it was "quite disgraceful" women were still paid less despite outperforming men in education for
This is completely untrue.
The truth is that even today, men are still, on average, more qualified than
are women - because it was not until the 80's that younger women began to catch
up with their similarly-aged male counterparts.
In other words, the older generation of working men - such as my good self - are far
more qualified on average than are their similarly-aged female counterparts.
And those men who are some ten years younger than my good self - who is 52 - are considerably
more qualified on average than their similarly-aged female counterparts
Furthermore, while it remains the case that men are
more motivated to earn money and climb career ladders than are women, there will
always be a so-called gender wage gap.
But this will not be due to discrimination, it will be due to the fact that men
work harder in the workplace. As such, this male hatred being continually promoted by the feminists over
the bogus wage gap will never go away!
Let us look at why this is the case.
For the sake of argument, just imagine for the moment that, currently, school
cleaners are all women and street cleaners are all men.
The tax-funded hate stirrers at the Equal Opportunities Commission discover
that school cleaners get paid less than street cleaners, and so they force, by
law, school cleaners to be paid the same as street cleaners.
What will happen is this.
More men will want to become school cleaners because there is no point in
them doing all the heavy work involved in street cleaning given that the pay is
now the same.
The number of street cleaners will fall.
The demand for street cleaners will rise.
The pay for street cleaners will rise.
The number of school cleaners will rise.
The demand for school cleaners will fall.
The pay for school cleaners will fall.
And so we end up back at Square One, as men, once again, troop off to become
street cleaners in order to earn more money.
In other words, there is never going to be a solution to this
bogus wage gap problem. And feminists are forever going to engender male hatred over
this issue in pursuit of an impossible goal.
the feminist-inspired myth that women are paid less
than men for the same work is risible
And, of course, in the commercial world, the feminist-inspired myth that
women are paid less than men for the same work is risible; because if this was
true then the men would soon be booted out of their jobs and replaced by the
Shareholders and management would hardly tolerate employing more
expensive workers when cheaper ones were available. They would be committing
commercial suicide if they failed to employ the 'cheaper' women while other
companies rushed to do so.
Anyway. Here is just one example demonstrating why women do not climb so high
in the workplace as men, statistically speaking; ...
Up to half of all single mothers do not want to work
to half of all single mothers do not want to work and simply will not take jobs, a report has
The analysis said Labour will never achieve its goal of persuading large numbers of lone parents to abandon a life on benefits because a huge proportion of them simply refuse to do
Furthermore, of course, the majority of these feminist women know damn well that men are far more
motivated in the workplace than are women, and they know damn well that it is
the choices of women that account for much of the wage gap, but, as per the BBC article above, they do not mention any of this.
In other words, they have no intention of engaging the public with any
reasonable discussion concerning the wage gap.
Well. This is because their main intention, quite clearly, is to use the issue to
stir up hatred towards men - not to solve the wage gap problem.
Their desire to promote male hatred is the core that
There is nothing that binds logically the various ideas
contained in the rhetoric of these women - except the desire to
hurt men. Their desire to promote male hatred is the core that unites them.
And if you still cannot see this, just consider for the moment that the
feminist-indoctrinated politicians (e.g. as mentioned in the above BBC article) never
even admit to the possibility that at least part of
the wage gap is due to women's choices.
In other words, they have absolutely no intention of dealing with this issue
in a way that does not demonise men.
For example, they could urge women to help close the wage gap themselves by
taking their work more seriously and putting more effort into it.
Why do they not do this? - given that they know that it is women themselves
who are at least partly responsible for the alleged wage gap?
Well. The answer is that they want to generate male hatred. And
they do not want to mute this hatred by suggesting that women themselves might
have something to do with the problem.
And when you understand that the real motivation behind the women's movement is
fuelled almost purely by male hatred, then what has been going on for the past
30 years begins to make sense.
You still think that I am exaggerating, eh?
OK. Then have a look at this
piece by Melanie Phillips entitled The
BBC and Gender Fascism. It gives some insight into how the feminists
at the BBC feel about men as they go about trying to destroy Valentine's Day -
the day in which men and women are supposed to declare their special love for
each other - by devoting hours and hours of programming to domestic violence.
But this special love is something that these emotionally-twisted permanently-enraged
men-hating wimmin at the BBC just do not understand. And it is something which makes them
so envious that they become determined to destroy it for everyone.
"If I cannot have this special kind of love - whatever it is - then I will destroy it so that no-one
else can have it!"
And this, for example, also explains many of the famous quotes made by
All sex is rape. All men are rapists. Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle.
Etc Etc Etc.
One of their main aims is to destroy the special
relationships between men and women
One of their main aims is to destroy the special relationships between men and
women (because they do not understand them and can never have them) and the method that they mostly use
to do this is to stir up hatred in women towards
men - often by claiming that men are cheating them in some way.
And if you still think that I am exaggerating, then just keep asking yourself this
Why should the feminist-dominated BBC choose to highlight domestic violence
against women over the Valentine Day period? - as opposed to any other part of
What makes them disseminate volumes of male hatred during this particular
time when men and women are supposed to be feeling romantic about one another?
Well. The answer is very simple.
They simply do not want women ever to feel so positive about the men with whom
they are intimately involved - and so, during this period, they do their very
best to demonise those men and to whip up hatred towards them.
And it is not just on Valentines Day that the BBC tries to sour the
relationships between men and women who are intimately involved with each other.
On Christmas Day, the BBC's most heavily promoted programme for some
years has been a soap opera called Eastenders, where viewers are treated to
storylines infested with sex-assault and domestic violence.
Indeed, here is the BBC's own description of one of their special Christmas
Day episodes ...
Kat finds Kelly but she’s too late. Zoe’s done a runner. Roxy beat up Kelly to find out where Zoe ran off to. Kelly tells Kat where Zoe is.
Trevor pushes Mo’s face in her Christmas dinner. He knocks the plate to the floor, and throws his wife into it, making her eat the turkey.
Trevor breaks down and apologises. Little Mo’s covered in gravy but she forgives him. She assures him that he’ll make a wonderful father one day.
Trevor discovers Little Mo’s contraceptive pills. He’s furious and he beats her up.
Yep: This is Christmas viewing from the BBC.
the BBC actually admits that many of its 'social campaigns'
In summary, the BBC spends tens of millions of pounds annually stirring up
male hatred. It does this via its chat shows, its drama productions and through
its news departments. Indeed, the BBC actually admits that many of its 'social
campaigns' are orchestrated throughout many of its various departments (News,
Drama, Chat etc) in order
to have the maximum effect.
That's right, Guys. For maximum effect, the BBC orchestrates and
disseminates man-hatred throughout all its programming categories.
It admits to doing this.