Biologist Steve Jones - A
Well. I'm glad that the article
Men have bred dogs and cattle. Why not
women? upset you so much, because it will give you
some insight into what western men have had to put up with for three decades.
There you were, filled with fury, over one simple article in a very humble and
Can you imagine, however, how much more anger you would feel
if, say, I had written an article, or a book, claiming that women were really
little more than walking lumps of warm wet meat designed simply for the purpose of
incubating men's babies?
And also imagine that I was a scientist! - who
actually taught his male students to see women in this way.
Wouldn't you be
could get worse.
Imagine, also, that highly-respected media outlets took up
these views that women were nothing more than baby incubators and also started to proclaim them widely, and thrust them in your
How would you feel then?
You're nothing more than a
warm wet lump of meat
designed solely for the purpose of carrying men's babies.
what if it was also being claimed that you were actually worse than useless when it came to
not feel deranged with anger?
I'm sure that you would,
given that my little article seems to have upset you so much.
Well, you sound as if you're from the UK, but, just in case you are
not, the BBC has a TV programme called Newsnight. It is the BBC's 'flagship'
news programme. It is watched by millions of viewers, and it has significant
credibility - a bit like '60 Minutes' in America.
A couple of weeks ago, on
the programme, the presenter, Kirsty Wark, introduced to the audience a
well-known UK professor of genetics, Steve Jones, so that he could publicise
his new book and present his view that men, biologically and behaviourally, are
Yep. Men are parasites,
is what he said.
And he wasn't
Now, please bear in mind that this fawning creep of a man is not
some crazed activist, like Angry Harry, but an alleged scientist with many
credentials and academic qualifications to his name.
And remember that
the Newsnight programme is a serious one. It is not a comedy or a soap. It is
deemed to be such a well-balanced and impartial news programme that it is the
'flagship' news programme of the BBC.
And the message being put out by this
influential programme and this self-promoting 'scientist' is that men are
Here is how the increasingly obnoxious Ms Wark
starts the piece.
"In his scientific opinion, men are
increasingly becoming fragile and irrelevant, while women are resilient and
adaptable. Some of men's problems are, as it were, built in, ..."
Men are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Got that?
That's his scientific opinion.
"But according to Steve Jones' new book, The
Descent of Men they are also the testosteroned-fueled authors of their own
Men are the authors of their own misfortune
because they have testosterone. Got that too?
Tell me. How would you feel to see millions of
viewers being told by a 'scientist' that you, as a woman, are becoming
increasingly irrelevant, and that your problems are largely oestrogenic, and
your own fault?
How would you feel to know that this supposed
scientist who teaches biology is actually indoctrinating his mostly-female undergraduates with
Ms Wark continues ...
"And if you have a Y chromosome there is no use
getting het up about his views [because] it will only make it worse."
Can you imagine women being told not to get het up about, say, breast cancer,
because it will only make things worse?
present here the image of Ms Wark as she utters the last sentence, because she
is smiling - almost laughing. There is an air of levity and humour about her as
she introduces Steve Jones' short piece about the medical problems that men face.
From this short piece, the viewers are going to learn that men die younger,
are more likely to have heart problems and get cancer, and so on, because of
And the increasingly obnoxious Ms Wark is smiling as she introduces it.
This woman loves to abuse her position to beat down upon men. To denigrate them.
Humiliate them. And to make them feel worthless.
I can assure you that if Newsnight was presenting a piece about the
problems faced by women there would certainly have been no humour over them, and
certainly no claim that women were parasites or the 'authors of their own
In fact, the programme would have been turned into something of an urgent call to do something about them.
The programme continues with a short documentary piece presented by
Here are some bits of it.
"... [Testosterone] is pretty dangerous stuff.
No-one has understood why testosterone is really so dangerous but now we are
beginning to get to get a glimpse of just how powerful it is.
"It doesn't just make us angry and spotty it
also very much depresses the immune system ... and, as a result, men are much
less able than women to counter infections of various kinds, like malaria or
syphilis or anything else, and even less able to counter cancer."
Jones then goes on to point out that testosterone is bad for the heart whereas oestrogen seems to be rather good for
it. He also states that over the past decade the sperm counts of men have
decreased as have the rates of testis cancer.
He goes on ...
"Women are doing better than men in all kinds
of ways. All over the developing world more girls than boys go to university.
... And the way things are going there will be twice as many women as men with
degrees within the next decade.
"Man's role is simply to fertilise
females. In many ways males are parasites on females because they persuade
females to copy their own genes. ... In the animal world once that's done, males
tend to disappear quite quickly. ... And the gap in life expectancy between men
and women has been there for quite a while, and is getting bigger and bigger."
So, there you have it.
According to this peculiar little man, the role of men is simply to fertilise
females and that, in many ways, they are parasites on females.
And he claims to be a biologist! A scientist!
However, if he was a good scientist, he would have known that the gap in life
expectancy between men and women is narrowing, not widening. (Any decent search
engine can confirm this for you.)
And if he was a good biologist he would know that parasites are organisms
that derive benefits from hosts of a different species while at
the same time harming them.
Besides which, there is about as much validity in claiming that men are
parasites on females because they persuade
females to copy their own genes as there is in claiming that
females are parasites on males because they steal their genes.
What is this ridiculous man going to come up with next in order to sell
Is he going to claim that babies and children are parasites, because they
do not bear exclusively their mother's genes?
After all, this is exactly what follows from
his premise that men are parasites.
If men are parasites then so must their
children be - both girls and boys.
What a nasty little idea.
But, frankly, it would suit him.
Oh. And by the way. He does write his books
for money, as he revealed in his recent
Observer interview with Sean O'Hagan.
The man is a good self-publicist, but not
necessarily a good scientist.
His main aim is not to educate people but to make
money from them.
Jones also goes on to suggest that
over the next few million years the Y chromosome is doomed, and that humans will
all naturally evolve into the female state.
Just before the summer holidays, I was talking
to a Biology teacher who teaches 15 year olds. I asked him what kind of things
the children were studying these days.
Genetics figured in there somewhere.
And for the last two lessons of term, the
children were going to be allowed to discuss whatever topics they liked in the
area of Biology.
One of the most popular topics suggested by
the children was the manipulation of genes to create boys or girls - or
15 year olds!
Even average 15 year olds can grasp the fact
that within the next two centuries or so humans will be able to modify just
about all of the genes that they want to modify, and that choosing the gender of
one's children is very shortly going to be a question far more to do with Man's
complex psychology than with Nature's relatively simplistic biology!
However, Steve Jones, it would seem, cannot
But then Steve Jones' credentials regarding
any predictions about the future seem largely to stem from his own speciality;
the genes of slugs and snails.
According to Steve Jones there are now many biologists with
his point of
Yes, indeed there are.
They are those biologists with a 'feminist
You already know the type, I'm sure.
Their idea is to turn as much biological knowledge as
possible into supporting the Fascist view that those human beings with male chromosomes
are parasites and unclean in some way.
These are the same politically-correct 'biologists' who for three decades
sought to deny the truth concerning the effects of genes on intelligence. These
are the same biologists who would claim that there are no significant
differences in humans that are not the result of nurture, despite the mountain
of evidence demonstrating otherwise.
These are not biologists or scientists. They are boot-lickers and creeps.
These are the people who spout politically-correct dogma whatever the
circumstances and whatever the facts.
And if you look at the phony 'academics' engaged in research from a 'feminist
perspective' you will also discover that they are not very bright, to say the
And this is hardly surprising given that the only qualifications for academic success these days,
especially for those with a 'feminist perspective', is the ability to mouth various politically-correct mantras
designed to appease feminists and minority activist groups.
As a teacher told me recently as he was applying for a new job at a higher
grade. "You have to give them the keywords in the interview. You have to learn the code.
It's all politics and political correctness and f*ck-all to do with
The authoress Fay Weldon was in the studio to discuss
Steve Jones' new book. She
started off by saying to Steve Jones "... It rather seems to me that you have
been as unkind to men in this book as Darwin was unkind to women."
his Gollum-like features beam back, revealing his agenda with pride.
And later on he says, "Males began as parasites on females. I
think you have to remember that. And I think we stay in that role."
But if anyone is a parasite, it is this man himself.
He is suckled and
funded by an institution which is paid for mostly by men through their taxes,
and yet he causes them enormous harm by seeking to claim that he has some scientific
justification for labeling them publicly as parasites.
Science my arse.
have been proud of him.
'scientist' was to dare to suggest that women were both irrelevant and
parasitic, he would almost certainly be dismissed from his job.
could even be successfully prosecuted for hate-speech in parts of the EU.
You have to understand what is
going on here.
This man is just
another one of those toads spreading
hatred toward males.
And he is
allowed to do this publicly with the full support of the BBC.
many of those in the BBC are in active support of his agenda.
have been for years!
what feminism and political correctness are all about. They're not about
fairness and equality. They're about pulverising men - particularly white,
heterosexual ones - and making damn sure that not a peep is said, nor a law
created, that offends women.
go to Hell.
But this sort of nastiness masquerading as
science, or as 'news' on the BBC, is absolutely typical from the politically
correct and the feminists. This is nothing unusual.
Both at the BBC and in very many universities
the careers of the staff depend almost exclusively on subscribing to the religion of
And it really is like a religion - a false one, which
encourages fabrication, intimidation and deceit. You just have to learn to
express the correct sentiments to join in.
Nothing else counts.
The truth is irrelevant. The consequences are irrelevant.
The only thing that matters is 'believing', or pretending to believe.
And the more blind is your subservience to this religion, the better are your
chances of promotion, and the stronger is the guarantee that you will not be
excommunicated e.g. lose your job.
It's also a bit like the old pyramid selling techniques.
You know, the best salesman sits at the top of the pyramid. Beneath him lie the next ten best
salesmen, each of whom
hand over to him a percentage of the rewards that they have reaped from managing
the less adept salesmen who sit below them.
And many other tiers of salesmen sit below this, depending on the size of
Well. What are the politically-correct selling?
They don't actually sell you a product. They just climb a ladder - usually
within a structure that is paid for by you (e.g. schools, colleges,
universities, police forces, social services, the BBC) or within private
enterprises such as in the media.
The size the Enterprise Of Political
Correctness is positively huge!
In fact, in most respects, political correctness is really not much different
from most other large religions.
Except in one very major respect.
Men and boys are perceived to be its enemy; particularly white, heterosexual
They are the infidels.
Some religions gained much of their power by offering to protect people from
the Devil if they performed certain duties. And they aimed to drive away the
Devil's power and influence.
The religion of political correctness has simply substituted white, heterosexual men for
And so you see, R, when you get angry over one
of my articles, I'm glad.
I hope it hurts.
You can experience just the tiniest taste of what millions of men
have had to endure for years.
Western men have to live in societies that are
absolutely saturated with this demonising sh*t.
News, adverts, soaps, academic papers,
politicians, women's groups, the whole abuse industry - they all pour out the
message that men are worthless all day long.
But it now seems that not only do the social
scientists, the anthropologists, the historians, the sociologists, the
psychologists, the women's studies nazis and all the other wooly academics
bow down to the Lord of Political Correctness, the biologists are at it too!
Jones is going to be teaching his
female undergraduates that men are parasites.
fully expect physicists to discover shortly a sub-atomic particle that proves
conclusively that while women were born of the stars, the men crawled out of
The truth of the matter
nowadays is that too many academics who rise to the top in most subjects are not
very bright. They can be bested by 15 year olds!
too many who do have much in the way of brains have sold their integrity long ago for
their careers and/or money. And so they just lie a lot.
Steve Jones' case, he's got a book to sell.
do the people who work at the BBC really support
the Newsnight team's continuing efforts to ridicule men? Don't they care that
their sons, their fathers, their husbands and their male friends are being
portrayed as parasites and as people who are 'increasingly irrelevant'?
they don't. Maybe they are just too well paid.
they can afford, for example, to avoid the
consequences of fatherlessness, the bad behaviours of young boys as they become
increasingly alienated from the toffs who view them as parasites and who fail
them in their education.
After all, the increasingly
obnoxious Ms Wark is said to get paid many tens of thousands for doing this
programme. And she is a typical media feminist who uses the BBC to foist her
vindictive misandric views upon the public.
And what galls many in the men's movement is
that men are forced to fund the BBC through the licence fee!
actually have to fund this hateful propaganda against themselves!
reminds me of Jews being forced to dig their own graves.
were parasites too, apparently.
the BBC is losing its credibility.
staff are clearly selected on the basis of their beliefs.
they must all bow low to the Lord of Political Correctness and to the feminists or
they will have their bottoms spanked.
the BBC is doing is illegal according to its Charter.
is a fraud perpetrated on the people who are misled into believing that it is
impartial e.g. see AH's Intellectual phonies at the BBC - the Late Review
and it has flouted the law in this respect for many years.
grand old institution which the British were once able to celebrate with pride
is now little more than a parasite itself.
R, look again at the hostility created in you by my article about breeding
women, and just think
seriously about what horrible effects the likes of the increasingly obnoxious Ms
her little 'scientist' friend are having on a very large number of men.
if you do this, you will surely realise that the article Men
have bred dogs and cattle. Why not women? may well be worth reading again,
and judging it on the basis of what you have just read above.
will more clearly see that what I said in that article is true.
I am an activist, which is why I am sending the URL of this piece to a host of Steve
Jones' work colleagues ...
to Steve Jones himself email@example.com
...and to a load of BBC staff whose names I do not wish to divulge.
should there be any untoward aggravation arising from this, my cronies and I will leaflet
the students at his college as well as email staff in many other departments.
No. I'm not worried about libel.
try telling the members of a jury that you are promoting the view that the men
sitting on it are all parasites, and that so are all of their children.
you for your email.
(Also see Men bear a striking resemblance to slugs)